Antibacterial Drug Shortages From 2001 to 2013: Implications for Clinical Practice

Farha Quadri, Maryann Mazer-Amirshahi, Erin R. Fox, Kristy L. Hawley, Jesse M. Pines, Mark S. Zocchi, Larissa S May

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

47 Scopus citations


Background. Previous studies have described drug shortages; however, there has been no comprehensive evaluation focusing on US antibacterial shortages. Methods. Drug shortage data from the University of Utah Drug Information Service database were analyzed, with a focus on antibacterial agents from 2001 to 2013. We used descriptive statistics to describe trends in drug shortages, analyze drug classes commonly affected, and investigate whether drugs experienced multiple periods of shortages. Results. One hundred forty-eight antibacterial drugs were on shortage over the 13-year study period, with 26 drugs still active on shortage as of December 2013. The median number of new shortages per year was 10 (interquartile range [IQR], 7). The number of drugs on shortage increased at a rate of 0.35 additional drugs every month (95% confidence interval, .22-.49) from July 2007 to December 2013 (P < .001). The median shortage duration was 188 days (IQR, 366.5). Twenty-two percent of drugs experienced multiple shortage periods. Conclusions. There were a substantial number of drug shortages from 2001 to 2013, with a dramatic rise in shortages since 2007. Shortages of agents used to treat multidrug-resistant infections are of concern due to continued transmission and limited treatment options.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1737-1742
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Infectious Diseases
Issue number12
StatePublished - Jun 15 2015
Externally publishedYes


  • Drug shortages
  • National drug codes (NDC)
  • University of Utah drug information service (UUDIS)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases


Dive into the research topics of 'Antibacterial Drug Shortages From 2001 to 2013: Implications for Clinical Practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this