Angry-happy interpretations of ambiguous faces in social anxiety disorder

Keren Maoz, Sharon Eldar, Joel Stoddard, Daniel S. Pine, Ellen Leibenluft, Yair Bar-Haim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) is characterized by a tendency to interpret ambiguous social cues as negative. Here we tested whether interpretation of ambiguous faces differs between participants with SAD and non-anxious controls. Twenty-seven individuals with SAD and 21 non-anxious control participants completed an emotion recognition task in which they judged ambiguous morphed faces as happy or angry. Participants with SAD judged a higher proportion of the faces as angry compared to non-anxious participants, and were slower to judge faces as angry compared to happy, while no such reaction time bias manifested in the control group. Finally, happy judgments were slower in the SAD group compared to the control group, while angry judgments were faster in the SAD group compared to the control group. These findings provide evidence for a negative bias in resolving emotional ambiguity in facial expressions among individuals with SAD.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)122-127
Number of pages6
JournalPsychiatry Research
Volume241
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 30 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Control Groups
Facial Expression
Social Phobia
Reaction Time
Cues
Emotions
Recognition (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Ambiguous facial expressions
  • Anger
  • Emotion
  • Interpretation bias
  • Social phobia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry

Cite this

Maoz, K., Eldar, S., Stoddard, J., Pine, D. S., Leibenluft, E., & Bar-Haim, Y. (2016). Angry-happy interpretations of ambiguous faces in social anxiety disorder. Psychiatry Research, 241, 122-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.04.100

Angry-happy interpretations of ambiguous faces in social anxiety disorder. / Maoz, Keren; Eldar, Sharon; Stoddard, Joel; Pine, Daniel S.; Leibenluft, Ellen; Bar-Haim, Yair.

In: Psychiatry Research, Vol. 241, 30.07.2016, p. 122-127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Maoz, K, Eldar, S, Stoddard, J, Pine, DS, Leibenluft, E & Bar-Haim, Y 2016, 'Angry-happy interpretations of ambiguous faces in social anxiety disorder', Psychiatry Research, vol. 241, pp. 122-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.04.100
Maoz K, Eldar S, Stoddard J, Pine DS, Leibenluft E, Bar-Haim Y. Angry-happy interpretations of ambiguous faces in social anxiety disorder. Psychiatry Research. 2016 Jul 30;241:122-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.04.100
Maoz, Keren ; Eldar, Sharon ; Stoddard, Joel ; Pine, Daniel S. ; Leibenluft, Ellen ; Bar-Haim, Yair. / Angry-happy interpretations of ambiguous faces in social anxiety disorder. In: Psychiatry Research. 2016 ; Vol. 241. pp. 122-127.
@article{884f9d975b6a41cf84440cc105fc98d9,
title = "Angry-happy interpretations of ambiguous faces in social anxiety disorder",
abstract = "Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) is characterized by a tendency to interpret ambiguous social cues as negative. Here we tested whether interpretation of ambiguous faces differs between participants with SAD and non-anxious controls. Twenty-seven individuals with SAD and 21 non-anxious control participants completed an emotion recognition task in which they judged ambiguous morphed faces as happy or angry. Participants with SAD judged a higher proportion of the faces as angry compared to non-anxious participants, and were slower to judge faces as angry compared to happy, while no such reaction time bias manifested in the control group. Finally, happy judgments were slower in the SAD group compared to the control group, while angry judgments were faster in the SAD group compared to the control group. These findings provide evidence for a negative bias in resolving emotional ambiguity in facial expressions among individuals with SAD.",
keywords = "Ambiguous facial expressions, Anger, Emotion, Interpretation bias, Social phobia",
author = "Keren Maoz and Sharon Eldar and Joel Stoddard and Pine, {Daniel S.} and Ellen Leibenluft and Yair Bar-Haim",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.psychres.2016.04.100",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "241",
pages = "122--127",
journal = "Psychiatry Research",
issn = "0165-1781",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Angry-happy interpretations of ambiguous faces in social anxiety disorder

AU - Maoz, Keren

AU - Eldar, Sharon

AU - Stoddard, Joel

AU - Pine, Daniel S.

AU - Leibenluft, Ellen

AU - Bar-Haim, Yair

PY - 2016/7/30

Y1 - 2016/7/30

N2 - Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) is characterized by a tendency to interpret ambiguous social cues as negative. Here we tested whether interpretation of ambiguous faces differs between participants with SAD and non-anxious controls. Twenty-seven individuals with SAD and 21 non-anxious control participants completed an emotion recognition task in which they judged ambiguous morphed faces as happy or angry. Participants with SAD judged a higher proportion of the faces as angry compared to non-anxious participants, and were slower to judge faces as angry compared to happy, while no such reaction time bias manifested in the control group. Finally, happy judgments were slower in the SAD group compared to the control group, while angry judgments were faster in the SAD group compared to the control group. These findings provide evidence for a negative bias in resolving emotional ambiguity in facial expressions among individuals with SAD.

AB - Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) is characterized by a tendency to interpret ambiguous social cues as negative. Here we tested whether interpretation of ambiguous faces differs between participants with SAD and non-anxious controls. Twenty-seven individuals with SAD and 21 non-anxious control participants completed an emotion recognition task in which they judged ambiguous morphed faces as happy or angry. Participants with SAD judged a higher proportion of the faces as angry compared to non-anxious participants, and were slower to judge faces as angry compared to happy, while no such reaction time bias manifested in the control group. Finally, happy judgments were slower in the SAD group compared to the control group, while angry judgments were faster in the SAD group compared to the control group. These findings provide evidence for a negative bias in resolving emotional ambiguity in facial expressions among individuals with SAD.

KW - Ambiguous facial expressions

KW - Anger

KW - Emotion

KW - Interpretation bias

KW - Social phobia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965079519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84965079519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.04.100

DO - 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.04.100

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84965079519

VL - 241

SP - 122

EP - 127

JO - Psychiatry Research

JF - Psychiatry Research

SN - 0165-1781

ER -