Angiotensin i and angiotensin II concentrations and their ratio in catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock

Rinaldo Bellomo, Richard G. Wunderink, Harold Szerlip, Shane W. English, Laurence W. Busse, Adam M. Deane, Ashish K. Khanna, Michael T. McCurdy, Marlies Ostermann, Paul J. Young, Damian R. Handisides, Lakhmir S. Chawla, George F. Tidmarsh, Timothy E. Albertson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: In patients with vasodilatory shock, plasma concentrations of angiotensin I (ANG I) and II (ANG II) and their ratio may reflect differences in the response to severe vasodilation, provide novel insights into its biology, and predict clinical outcomes. The objective of these protocol prespecified and subsequent post hoc analyses was to assess the epidemiology and outcome associations of plasma ANG I and ANG II levels and their ratio in patients with catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock (CRVS) enrolled in the Angiotensin II for the Treatment of High-Output Shock (ATHOS-3) study. Methods: We measured ANG I and ANG II levels at baseline, calculated their ratio, and compared these results to values from healthy volunteers (controls). We dichotomized patients according to the median ANG I/II ratio (1.63) and compared demographics, clinical characteristics, and clinical outcomes. We constructed a Cox proportional hazards model to test the independent association of ANG I, ANG II, and their ratio with clinical outcomes. Results: Median baseline ANG I level (253 pg/mL [interquartile range (IQR) 72.30-676.00 pg/mL] vs 42 pg/mL [IQR 30.46-87.34 pg/mL] in controls; P < 0.0001) and median ANG I/II ratio (1.63 [IQR 0.98-5.25] vs 0.4 [IQR 0.28-0.64] in controls; P < 0.0001) were elevated, whereas median ANG II levels were similar (84 pg/mL [IQR 23.85-299.50 pg/mL] vs 97 pg/mL [IQR 35.27-181.01 pg/mL] in controls; P = 0.9895). At baseline, patients with a ratio above the median (≥1.63) had higher ANG I levels (P < 0.0001), lower ANG II levels (P < 0.0001), higher albumin concentrations (P = 0.007), and greater incidence of recent (within 1 week) exposure to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (P < 0.00001), and they received a higher norepinephrine-equivalent dose (P = 0.003). In the placebo group, a baseline ANG I/II ratio <1.63 was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio 0.56; 95% confidence interval 0.36-0.88; P = 0.01) on unadjusted analyses. Conclusions: Patients with CRVS have elevated ANG I levels and ANG I/II ratios compared with healthy controls. In such patients, a high ANG I/II ratio is associated with greater norepinephrine requirements and is an independent predictor of mortality, thus providing a biological rationale for interventions aimed at its correction. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02338843. Registered 14 January 2015.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number43
JournalCritical Care
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 6 2020

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • ACE
  • ACE dysfunction
  • Angiotensin I
  • Angiotensin II
  • Sepsis
  • Vasodilatory shock

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Bellomo, R., Wunderink, R. G., Szerlip, H., English, S. W., Busse, L. W., Deane, A. M., Khanna, A. K., McCurdy, M. T., Ostermann, M., Young, P. J., Handisides, D. R., Chawla, L. S., Tidmarsh, G. F., & Albertson, T. E. (2020). Angiotensin i and angiotensin II concentrations and their ratio in catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock. Critical Care, 24(1), [43]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-2733-x