Anesthetic preconditioning combined with postconditioning offers no additional benefit over preconditioning or postconditioning alone

David I. Deyhimy, Neal Fleming, Ian G. Brodkin, Hong Liu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent investigations demonstrate that anesthetic preconditioning and postconditioning reduce myocardial infarct size to a degree comparable to that achieved with ischemic preconditioning. We hypothesized that the combination of sevoflurane preconditioning and postconditioning would result in greater preservation of myocardium. METHODS: Langendorff perfused rat hearts were divided into four groups: control, preconditioning, postconditioning, and preconditioning plus postconditioning. During reperfusion, left ventricular function (left ventricular developed pressure, left ventricular end diastolic pressure, and dp/dt) were measured. At the end of reperfusion, the infarct sizes were measured with 2,3,5 triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining. Nuclear magnetic resonance was used to measure intracellular pH, Na, and Ca. RESULTS: Left ventricular developed pressure, left ventricular end diastolic pressure, left ventricular dp/dtmax and dp/dtmin were significantly improved in the treatment groups when compared with those in the controls. Myocardial infarct size (24% ± 7%, 16% ± 8%, and 22% ± 7% in preconditioning, postconditioning, and pre-plus postconditioning groups versus 44% ± 8% in the control group, P < 0.05) and intracellular Na and Ca were significantly decreased in all experimental groups at the end of reperfusion when compared with those in control. However, there were no differences between these variables in each treatment group. CONCLUSION: Sevoflurane postconditioning is as effective as preconditioning in protecting myocardial function after global ischemia. The combination of sevoflurane preconditioning and postconditioning offered no additional benefit over either intervention alone.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)316-324
Number of pages9
JournalAnesthesia and Analgesia
Volume105
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2007

Fingerprint

Combined Anesthetics
Reperfusion
Ventricular Pressure
Myocardial Infarction
Blood Pressure
Ischemic Preconditioning
Control Groups
Left Ventricular Function
Anesthetics
Myocardium
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Ischemia
Staining and Labeling
Therapeutics
sevoflurane

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Anesthetic preconditioning combined with postconditioning offers no additional benefit over preconditioning or postconditioning alone. / Deyhimy, David I.; Fleming, Neal; Brodkin, Ian G.; Liu, Hong.

In: Anesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 105, No. 2, 08.2007, p. 316-324.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{eb6902e56bf443239d9f26419de97a3c,
title = "Anesthetic preconditioning combined with postconditioning offers no additional benefit over preconditioning or postconditioning alone",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Recent investigations demonstrate that anesthetic preconditioning and postconditioning reduce myocardial infarct size to a degree comparable to that achieved with ischemic preconditioning. We hypothesized that the combination of sevoflurane preconditioning and postconditioning would result in greater preservation of myocardium. METHODS: Langendorff perfused rat hearts were divided into four groups: control, preconditioning, postconditioning, and preconditioning plus postconditioning. During reperfusion, left ventricular function (left ventricular developed pressure, left ventricular end diastolic pressure, and dp/dt) were measured. At the end of reperfusion, the infarct sizes were measured with 2,3,5 triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining. Nuclear magnetic resonance was used to measure intracellular pH, Na, and Ca. RESULTS: Left ventricular developed pressure, left ventricular end diastolic pressure, left ventricular dp/dtmax and dp/dtmin were significantly improved in the treatment groups when compared with those in the controls. Myocardial infarct size (24{\%} ± 7{\%}, 16{\%} ± 8{\%}, and 22{\%} ± 7{\%} in preconditioning, postconditioning, and pre-plus postconditioning groups versus 44{\%} ± 8{\%} in the control group, P < 0.05) and intracellular Na and Ca were significantly decreased in all experimental groups at the end of reperfusion when compared with those in control. However, there were no differences between these variables in each treatment group. CONCLUSION: Sevoflurane postconditioning is as effective as preconditioning in protecting myocardial function after global ischemia. The combination of sevoflurane preconditioning and postconditioning offered no additional benefit over either intervention alone.",
author = "Deyhimy, {David I.} and Neal Fleming and Brodkin, {Ian G.} and Hong Liu",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1213/01.ane.0000267524.71445.e7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "105",
pages = "316--324",
journal = "Anesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "0003-2999",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anesthetic preconditioning combined with postconditioning offers no additional benefit over preconditioning or postconditioning alone

AU - Deyhimy, David I.

AU - Fleming, Neal

AU - Brodkin, Ian G.

AU - Liu, Hong

PY - 2007/8

Y1 - 2007/8

N2 - BACKGROUND: Recent investigations demonstrate that anesthetic preconditioning and postconditioning reduce myocardial infarct size to a degree comparable to that achieved with ischemic preconditioning. We hypothesized that the combination of sevoflurane preconditioning and postconditioning would result in greater preservation of myocardium. METHODS: Langendorff perfused rat hearts were divided into four groups: control, preconditioning, postconditioning, and preconditioning plus postconditioning. During reperfusion, left ventricular function (left ventricular developed pressure, left ventricular end diastolic pressure, and dp/dt) were measured. At the end of reperfusion, the infarct sizes were measured with 2,3,5 triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining. Nuclear magnetic resonance was used to measure intracellular pH, Na, and Ca. RESULTS: Left ventricular developed pressure, left ventricular end diastolic pressure, left ventricular dp/dtmax and dp/dtmin were significantly improved in the treatment groups when compared with those in the controls. Myocardial infarct size (24% ± 7%, 16% ± 8%, and 22% ± 7% in preconditioning, postconditioning, and pre-plus postconditioning groups versus 44% ± 8% in the control group, P < 0.05) and intracellular Na and Ca were significantly decreased in all experimental groups at the end of reperfusion when compared with those in control. However, there were no differences between these variables in each treatment group. CONCLUSION: Sevoflurane postconditioning is as effective as preconditioning in protecting myocardial function after global ischemia. The combination of sevoflurane preconditioning and postconditioning offered no additional benefit over either intervention alone.

AB - BACKGROUND: Recent investigations demonstrate that anesthetic preconditioning and postconditioning reduce myocardial infarct size to a degree comparable to that achieved with ischemic preconditioning. We hypothesized that the combination of sevoflurane preconditioning and postconditioning would result in greater preservation of myocardium. METHODS: Langendorff perfused rat hearts were divided into four groups: control, preconditioning, postconditioning, and preconditioning plus postconditioning. During reperfusion, left ventricular function (left ventricular developed pressure, left ventricular end diastolic pressure, and dp/dt) were measured. At the end of reperfusion, the infarct sizes were measured with 2,3,5 triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining. Nuclear magnetic resonance was used to measure intracellular pH, Na, and Ca. RESULTS: Left ventricular developed pressure, left ventricular end diastolic pressure, left ventricular dp/dtmax and dp/dtmin were significantly improved in the treatment groups when compared with those in the controls. Myocardial infarct size (24% ± 7%, 16% ± 8%, and 22% ± 7% in preconditioning, postconditioning, and pre-plus postconditioning groups versus 44% ± 8% in the control group, P < 0.05) and intracellular Na and Ca were significantly decreased in all experimental groups at the end of reperfusion when compared with those in control. However, there were no differences between these variables in each treatment group. CONCLUSION: Sevoflurane postconditioning is as effective as preconditioning in protecting myocardial function after global ischemia. The combination of sevoflurane preconditioning and postconditioning offered no additional benefit over either intervention alone.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547588184&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547588184&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1213/01.ane.0000267524.71445.e7

DO - 10.1213/01.ane.0000267524.71445.e7

M3 - Article

C2 - 17646483

AN - SCOPUS:34547588184

VL - 105

SP - 316

EP - 324

JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 0003-2999

IS - 2

ER -