Anemia in the setting of traumatic brain injury: The arguments for and against liberal transfusion

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Anemia is recognized as a possible cause of secondary injury following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Cogent arguments can be made for both liberal and restrictive blood transfusion practices in this setting. In this narrative review, we summarize available knowledge regarding the risks of anemia and transfusion in patients with TBI. Laboratory studies using animal models and healthy human subjects suggest that anemia below a hemoglobin (Hb) concentration of 7 g/dL results in impaired brain function and below 10 g/dL may be detrimental to recovery from TBI. Clinical studies that have evaluated the association of anemia with clinical outcomes have not consistently demonstrated harm, but they generally have important methodological weaknesses. Alternatively, studies that have analyzed transfusion as a predictor of worse outcome have consistently identified such an association, but these studies may involve residual confounding. What little information exists from randomized trials that have included patients with TBI and evaluated liberal versus restrictive transfusion strategies is inconclusive. Since anemia in the setting of TBI is relatively common and there is considerable variation in transfusion preferences, greater study of this topic - preferably with one or more rigorous, adequately powered, non-inferiority randomized trials - is desirable.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)155-165
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Neurotrauma
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011

Fingerprint

Anemia
Blood Transfusion
Healthy Volunteers
Hemoglobins
Animal Models
Traumatic Brain Injury
Wounds and Injuries
Brain

Keywords

  • anemia
  • blood transfusion
  • brain injuries
  • erythrocyte transfusion
  • traumatic brain injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

@article{d405aa3067a545b2826a7809caa9e6c4,
title = "Anemia in the setting of traumatic brain injury: The arguments for and against liberal transfusion",
abstract = "Anemia is recognized as a possible cause of secondary injury following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Cogent arguments can be made for both liberal and restrictive blood transfusion practices in this setting. In this narrative review, we summarize available knowledge regarding the risks of anemia and transfusion in patients with TBI. Laboratory studies using animal models and healthy human subjects suggest that anemia below a hemoglobin (Hb) concentration of 7 g/dL results in impaired brain function and below 10 g/dL may be detrimental to recovery from TBI. Clinical studies that have evaluated the association of anemia with clinical outcomes have not consistently demonstrated harm, but they generally have important methodological weaknesses. Alternatively, studies that have analyzed transfusion as a predictor of worse outcome have consistently identified such an association, but these studies may involve residual confounding. What little information exists from randomized trials that have included patients with TBI and evaluated liberal versus restrictive transfusion strategies is inconclusive. Since anemia in the setting of TBI is relatively common and there is considerable variation in transfusion preferences, greater study of this topic - preferably with one or more rigorous, adequately powered, non-inferiority randomized trials - is desirable.",
keywords = "anemia, blood transfusion, brain injuries, erythrocyte transfusion, traumatic brain injury",
author = "Utter, {Garth H} and Kiarash Shahlaie and Marike Zwienenberg-Lee and Muizelaar, {Jan Paul}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/neu.2010.1451",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "155--165",
journal = "Journal of Neurotrauma",
issn = "0897-7151",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anemia in the setting of traumatic brain injury

T2 - The arguments for and against liberal transfusion

AU - Utter, Garth H

AU - Shahlaie, Kiarash

AU - Zwienenberg-Lee, Marike

AU - Muizelaar, Jan Paul

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Anemia is recognized as a possible cause of secondary injury following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Cogent arguments can be made for both liberal and restrictive blood transfusion practices in this setting. In this narrative review, we summarize available knowledge regarding the risks of anemia and transfusion in patients with TBI. Laboratory studies using animal models and healthy human subjects suggest that anemia below a hemoglobin (Hb) concentration of 7 g/dL results in impaired brain function and below 10 g/dL may be detrimental to recovery from TBI. Clinical studies that have evaluated the association of anemia with clinical outcomes have not consistently demonstrated harm, but they generally have important methodological weaknesses. Alternatively, studies that have analyzed transfusion as a predictor of worse outcome have consistently identified such an association, but these studies may involve residual confounding. What little information exists from randomized trials that have included patients with TBI and evaluated liberal versus restrictive transfusion strategies is inconclusive. Since anemia in the setting of TBI is relatively common and there is considerable variation in transfusion preferences, greater study of this topic - preferably with one or more rigorous, adequately powered, non-inferiority randomized trials - is desirable.

AB - Anemia is recognized as a possible cause of secondary injury following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Cogent arguments can be made for both liberal and restrictive blood transfusion practices in this setting. In this narrative review, we summarize available knowledge regarding the risks of anemia and transfusion in patients with TBI. Laboratory studies using animal models and healthy human subjects suggest that anemia below a hemoglobin (Hb) concentration of 7 g/dL results in impaired brain function and below 10 g/dL may be detrimental to recovery from TBI. Clinical studies that have evaluated the association of anemia with clinical outcomes have not consistently demonstrated harm, but they generally have important methodological weaknesses. Alternatively, studies that have analyzed transfusion as a predictor of worse outcome have consistently identified such an association, but these studies may involve residual confounding. What little information exists from randomized trials that have included patients with TBI and evaluated liberal versus restrictive transfusion strategies is inconclusive. Since anemia in the setting of TBI is relatively common and there is considerable variation in transfusion preferences, greater study of this topic - preferably with one or more rigorous, adequately powered, non-inferiority randomized trials - is desirable.

KW - anemia

KW - blood transfusion

KW - brain injuries

KW - erythrocyte transfusion

KW - traumatic brain injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78651378255&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78651378255&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/neu.2010.1451

DO - 10.1089/neu.2010.1451

M3 - Article

C2 - 20954887

AN - SCOPUS:78651378255

VL - 28

SP - 155

EP - 165

JO - Journal of Neurotrauma

JF - Journal of Neurotrauma

SN - 0897-7151

IS - 1

ER -