An official research policy statement of the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society: Standards for quantitative assessment of lung structure

Connie C W Hsia, Dallas M. Hyde, Matthias Ochs, Ewald R. Weibel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

475 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The charge of this Joint ATS/ERS Task Force was to critically review the state-of-the-art stereological methods in lung morphometry, provide practical guidelines for use of these methods in basic and translational lung research, define standards to promote comparability of morphometric studies, and examine the extension of these methods to noninvasive lung imaging. Broad conclusions regarding study design and standardization: 1. In quantitative assessment of lung structure, accuracy is far more critical than precision, because inaccurate or biased data cannot be made accurate by increasing the number of measurements. The only effective way to avoid bias and ensure accuracy is via rigorous experimental design and standardization of each step of tissue fixation, processing, sampling, and analysis. 2. With an efficient study design, the number of samples, sections, images, and measurements at each analytical stage can be kept low without compromising accuracy and still achieving reasonable global precision in the results. 3. Principles of design-based stereology can be applied to the sampling and morphometric analysis of structures obtained by in vivo imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET). Principles for standardization of study design: 4. The lung should be fixed under well-defined inflation and perfusion conditions, using appropriate fixative(s) and processing procedures that result in the best structural preservation with the least tissue distortion for the intended study goal. 5. Tissue blocks or image fields should be selected using proven unbiased sampling schemes to ensure that all parts of the whole have an equal chance for being sampled. 6. Structures that are nonrandom in orientation or distribution, and biopsy samples from nonrandom target sites, require special sampling and analytical strategies. Recommendations for methods of quantification: 7. Stereological methods that are free of geometric assumptions must be used to efficiently quantify number, length, surface area, and volume at an adequate spatial resolution to ensure that measurements made on two-dimensional (2D) images accurately represent the three-dimensional (3D) structure. 8. Alveolar surface area can be accurately estimated from profile boundary lengths or intersection counting using systematic linear probes in 2D sections that are "uniform random" (i.e., selected from all possible sections with the same probability); however, the measurement is sensitive to resolution. 9. Alveolar number and size (volume) can be accurately measured using 3D volume probes such as the disector, but not from simple counts of profiles or measurements of cross-sectional areas in uniform random 2D sections. 10. Stereological measurements should be related to the volume of the lung or an appropriate reference space. Measurements made on lung biopsy specimens should be related to an internal reference space.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)394-418
Number of pages25
JournalAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Volume181
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 15 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Lung
Research
Tissue Fixation
Biopsy
Fixatives
Translational Medical Research
Economic Inflation
Advisory Committees
Positron-Emission Tomography
Research Design
Perfusion
Joints
Tomography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Guidelines

Keywords

  • Cell number
  • Cell size
  • Cell volume
  • In vivo imaging
  • Morphometry
  • Reference lung volume
  • Stereology
  • Surface area
  • Unbiased sampling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

An official research policy statement of the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society : Standards for quantitative assessment of lung structure. / Hsia, Connie C W; Hyde, Dallas M.; Ochs, Matthias; Weibel, Ewald R.

In: American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 181, No. 4, 15.02.2010, p. 394-418.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5d8bfab7c1de4129bcdd132e9f382bb3,
title = "An official research policy statement of the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society: Standards for quantitative assessment of lung structure",
abstract = "The charge of this Joint ATS/ERS Task Force was to critically review the state-of-the-art stereological methods in lung morphometry, provide practical guidelines for use of these methods in basic and translational lung research, define standards to promote comparability of morphometric studies, and examine the extension of these methods to noninvasive lung imaging. Broad conclusions regarding study design and standardization: 1. In quantitative assessment of lung structure, accuracy is far more critical than precision, because inaccurate or biased data cannot be made accurate by increasing the number of measurements. The only effective way to avoid bias and ensure accuracy is via rigorous experimental design and standardization of each step of tissue fixation, processing, sampling, and analysis. 2. With an efficient study design, the number of samples, sections, images, and measurements at each analytical stage can be kept low without compromising accuracy and still achieving reasonable global precision in the results. 3. Principles of design-based stereology can be applied to the sampling and morphometric analysis of structures obtained by in vivo imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET). Principles for standardization of study design: 4. The lung should be fixed under well-defined inflation and perfusion conditions, using appropriate fixative(s) and processing procedures that result in the best structural preservation with the least tissue distortion for the intended study goal. 5. Tissue blocks or image fields should be selected using proven unbiased sampling schemes to ensure that all parts of the whole have an equal chance for being sampled. 6. Structures that are nonrandom in orientation or distribution, and biopsy samples from nonrandom target sites, require special sampling and analytical strategies. Recommendations for methods of quantification: 7. Stereological methods that are free of geometric assumptions must be used to efficiently quantify number, length, surface area, and volume at an adequate spatial resolution to ensure that measurements made on two-dimensional (2D) images accurately represent the three-dimensional (3D) structure. 8. Alveolar surface area can be accurately estimated from profile boundary lengths or intersection counting using systematic linear probes in 2D sections that are {"}uniform random{"} (i.e., selected from all possible sections with the same probability); however, the measurement is sensitive to resolution. 9. Alveolar number and size (volume) can be accurately measured using 3D volume probes such as the disector, but not from simple counts of profiles or measurements of cross-sectional areas in uniform random 2D sections. 10. Stereological measurements should be related to the volume of the lung or an appropriate reference space. Measurements made on lung biopsy specimens should be related to an internal reference space.",
keywords = "Cell number, Cell size, Cell volume, In vivo imaging, Morphometry, Reference lung volume, Stereology, Surface area, Unbiased sampling",
author = "Hsia, {Connie C W} and Hyde, {Dallas M.} and Matthias Ochs and Weibel, {Ewald R.}",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1164/rccm.200809-1522ST",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "181",
pages = "394--418",
journal = "American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "1073-449X",
publisher = "American Thoracic Society",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An official research policy statement of the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society

T2 - Standards for quantitative assessment of lung structure

AU - Hsia, Connie C W

AU - Hyde, Dallas M.

AU - Ochs, Matthias

AU - Weibel, Ewald R.

PY - 2010/2/15

Y1 - 2010/2/15

N2 - The charge of this Joint ATS/ERS Task Force was to critically review the state-of-the-art stereological methods in lung morphometry, provide practical guidelines for use of these methods in basic and translational lung research, define standards to promote comparability of morphometric studies, and examine the extension of these methods to noninvasive lung imaging. Broad conclusions regarding study design and standardization: 1. In quantitative assessment of lung structure, accuracy is far more critical than precision, because inaccurate or biased data cannot be made accurate by increasing the number of measurements. The only effective way to avoid bias and ensure accuracy is via rigorous experimental design and standardization of each step of tissue fixation, processing, sampling, and analysis. 2. With an efficient study design, the number of samples, sections, images, and measurements at each analytical stage can be kept low without compromising accuracy and still achieving reasonable global precision in the results. 3. Principles of design-based stereology can be applied to the sampling and morphometric analysis of structures obtained by in vivo imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET). Principles for standardization of study design: 4. The lung should be fixed under well-defined inflation and perfusion conditions, using appropriate fixative(s) and processing procedures that result in the best structural preservation with the least tissue distortion for the intended study goal. 5. Tissue blocks or image fields should be selected using proven unbiased sampling schemes to ensure that all parts of the whole have an equal chance for being sampled. 6. Structures that are nonrandom in orientation or distribution, and biopsy samples from nonrandom target sites, require special sampling and analytical strategies. Recommendations for methods of quantification: 7. Stereological methods that are free of geometric assumptions must be used to efficiently quantify number, length, surface area, and volume at an adequate spatial resolution to ensure that measurements made on two-dimensional (2D) images accurately represent the three-dimensional (3D) structure. 8. Alveolar surface area can be accurately estimated from profile boundary lengths or intersection counting using systematic linear probes in 2D sections that are "uniform random" (i.e., selected from all possible sections with the same probability); however, the measurement is sensitive to resolution. 9. Alveolar number and size (volume) can be accurately measured using 3D volume probes such as the disector, but not from simple counts of profiles or measurements of cross-sectional areas in uniform random 2D sections. 10. Stereological measurements should be related to the volume of the lung or an appropriate reference space. Measurements made on lung biopsy specimens should be related to an internal reference space.

AB - The charge of this Joint ATS/ERS Task Force was to critically review the state-of-the-art stereological methods in lung morphometry, provide practical guidelines for use of these methods in basic and translational lung research, define standards to promote comparability of morphometric studies, and examine the extension of these methods to noninvasive lung imaging. Broad conclusions regarding study design and standardization: 1. In quantitative assessment of lung structure, accuracy is far more critical than precision, because inaccurate or biased data cannot be made accurate by increasing the number of measurements. The only effective way to avoid bias and ensure accuracy is via rigorous experimental design and standardization of each step of tissue fixation, processing, sampling, and analysis. 2. With an efficient study design, the number of samples, sections, images, and measurements at each analytical stage can be kept low without compromising accuracy and still achieving reasonable global precision in the results. 3. Principles of design-based stereology can be applied to the sampling and morphometric analysis of structures obtained by in vivo imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET). Principles for standardization of study design: 4. The lung should be fixed under well-defined inflation and perfusion conditions, using appropriate fixative(s) and processing procedures that result in the best structural preservation with the least tissue distortion for the intended study goal. 5. Tissue blocks or image fields should be selected using proven unbiased sampling schemes to ensure that all parts of the whole have an equal chance for being sampled. 6. Structures that are nonrandom in orientation or distribution, and biopsy samples from nonrandom target sites, require special sampling and analytical strategies. Recommendations for methods of quantification: 7. Stereological methods that are free of geometric assumptions must be used to efficiently quantify number, length, surface area, and volume at an adequate spatial resolution to ensure that measurements made on two-dimensional (2D) images accurately represent the three-dimensional (3D) structure. 8. Alveolar surface area can be accurately estimated from profile boundary lengths or intersection counting using systematic linear probes in 2D sections that are "uniform random" (i.e., selected from all possible sections with the same probability); however, the measurement is sensitive to resolution. 9. Alveolar number and size (volume) can be accurately measured using 3D volume probes such as the disector, but not from simple counts of profiles or measurements of cross-sectional areas in uniform random 2D sections. 10. Stereological measurements should be related to the volume of the lung or an appropriate reference space. Measurements made on lung biopsy specimens should be related to an internal reference space.

KW - Cell number

KW - Cell size

KW - Cell volume

KW - In vivo imaging

KW - Morphometry

KW - Reference lung volume

KW - Stereology

KW - Surface area

KW - Unbiased sampling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=76149084817&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=76149084817&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1164/rccm.200809-1522ST

DO - 10.1164/rccm.200809-1522ST

M3 - Article

C2 - 20130146

AN - SCOPUS:76149084817

VL - 181

SP - 394

EP - 418

JO - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

JF - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

SN - 1073-449X

IS - 4

ER -