An Implementation Science Approach to Antibiotic Stewardship in Emergency Departments and Urgent Care Centers

Kabir Yadav, Aubyn Stahmer, Rakesh D. Mistry, Larissa May

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Antibiotic stewardship efforts have expanded focus from inpatient to include outpatient settings. However, stewardship is urgently needed in acute care ambulatory settings: emergency departments (EDs) and urgent care centers (UCCs). Implementation of antibiotic stewardship in acute ambulatory care settings has been limited. Two major barriers to effective implementation exist: 1) lack of adaptation of successful outpatient stewardship interventions to the acute care ambulatory setting and 2) absence of rigorous measurement of implementation processes in EDs and UCCs in a manner that informs future scale and spread. Objectives: Our objective was to apply an implementation science approach to address antibiotic overuse and inappropriate use in EDs and UCCs. Methods: This study was a redesign of an evidence-based outpatient antibiotic stewardship intervention at participating EDs and UCCs using an innovative implementation science framework (dynamic adaptation process), adaptable for local clinical workflow and local champion provision. We evaluated multiple implementation outcome metrics throughout a cluster-randomized comparative effectiveness clinical trial of two approaches to the adapted antibiotic stewardship interventions. Results: Our preimplementation phase included 21 in-depth interviews and online provider surveys (52% response rate). For the postimplementation survey, we had a 39% response rate. We identified common themes including patient expectations, lack of knowledge of existing guidelines, and maintenance of education over time. Additional themes indicated differences in modifications needed by type of clinical setting. Adoption of public commitment was high, with 79% of providers signing a commitment log, and 84% received public commitment flair. Signing of public commitment posters rate was 62%, as several sites chose not to use this component. Acceptability, fidelity, and appropriateness were also measured. Conclusions: We demonstrate that implementation science approaches can help address the problem of unnecessary antibiotic use in EDs and UCCs with high acceptability and adoption. Similar approaches could be used to tailor quality improvement interventions in these settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Emergency Medical Services
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Hospital Emergency Service
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Ambulatory Care
Outpatients
Posters
Workflow
Quality Improvement
Inpatients
Maintenance
Clinical Trials
Guidelines
Interviews
Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

An Implementation Science Approach to Antibiotic Stewardship in Emergency Departments and Urgent Care Centers. / Yadav, Kabir; Stahmer, Aubyn; Mistry, Rakesh D.; May, Larissa.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0fe4bd4b977f4ab08166c5a02a0cae32,
title = "An Implementation Science Approach to Antibiotic Stewardship in Emergency Departments and Urgent Care Centers",
abstract = "Background: Antibiotic stewardship efforts have expanded focus from inpatient to include outpatient settings. However, stewardship is urgently needed in acute care ambulatory settings: emergency departments (EDs) and urgent care centers (UCCs). Implementation of antibiotic stewardship in acute ambulatory care settings has been limited. Two major barriers to effective implementation exist: 1) lack of adaptation of successful outpatient stewardship interventions to the acute care ambulatory setting and 2) absence of rigorous measurement of implementation processes in EDs and UCCs in a manner that informs future scale and spread. Objectives: Our objective was to apply an implementation science approach to address antibiotic overuse and inappropriate use in EDs and UCCs. Methods: This study was a redesign of an evidence-based outpatient antibiotic stewardship intervention at participating EDs and UCCs using an innovative implementation science framework (dynamic adaptation process), adaptable for local clinical workflow and local champion provision. We evaluated multiple implementation outcome metrics throughout a cluster-randomized comparative effectiveness clinical trial of two approaches to the adapted antibiotic stewardship interventions. Results: Our preimplementation phase included 21 in-depth interviews and online provider surveys (52{\%} response rate). For the postimplementation survey, we had a 39{\%} response rate. We identified common themes including patient expectations, lack of knowledge of existing guidelines, and maintenance of education over time. Additional themes indicated differences in modifications needed by type of clinical setting. Adoption of public commitment was high, with 79{\%} of providers signing a commitment log, and 84{\%} received public commitment flair. Signing of public commitment posters rate was 62{\%}, as several sites chose not to use this component. Acceptability, fidelity, and appropriateness were also measured. Conclusions: We demonstrate that implementation science approaches can help address the problem of unnecessary antibiotic use in EDs and UCCs with high acceptability and adoption. Similar approaches could be used to tailor quality improvement interventions in these settings.",
author = "Kabir Yadav and Aubyn Stahmer and Mistry, {Rakesh D.} and Larissa May",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/acem.13873",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Implementation Science Approach to Antibiotic Stewardship in Emergency Departments and Urgent Care Centers

AU - Yadav, Kabir

AU - Stahmer, Aubyn

AU - Mistry, Rakesh D.

AU - May, Larissa

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Antibiotic stewardship efforts have expanded focus from inpatient to include outpatient settings. However, stewardship is urgently needed in acute care ambulatory settings: emergency departments (EDs) and urgent care centers (UCCs). Implementation of antibiotic stewardship in acute ambulatory care settings has been limited. Two major barriers to effective implementation exist: 1) lack of adaptation of successful outpatient stewardship interventions to the acute care ambulatory setting and 2) absence of rigorous measurement of implementation processes in EDs and UCCs in a manner that informs future scale and spread. Objectives: Our objective was to apply an implementation science approach to address antibiotic overuse and inappropriate use in EDs and UCCs. Methods: This study was a redesign of an evidence-based outpatient antibiotic stewardship intervention at participating EDs and UCCs using an innovative implementation science framework (dynamic adaptation process), adaptable for local clinical workflow and local champion provision. We evaluated multiple implementation outcome metrics throughout a cluster-randomized comparative effectiveness clinical trial of two approaches to the adapted antibiotic stewardship interventions. Results: Our preimplementation phase included 21 in-depth interviews and online provider surveys (52% response rate). For the postimplementation survey, we had a 39% response rate. We identified common themes including patient expectations, lack of knowledge of existing guidelines, and maintenance of education over time. Additional themes indicated differences in modifications needed by type of clinical setting. Adoption of public commitment was high, with 79% of providers signing a commitment log, and 84% received public commitment flair. Signing of public commitment posters rate was 62%, as several sites chose not to use this component. Acceptability, fidelity, and appropriateness were also measured. Conclusions: We demonstrate that implementation science approaches can help address the problem of unnecessary antibiotic use in EDs and UCCs with high acceptability and adoption. Similar approaches could be used to tailor quality improvement interventions in these settings.

AB - Background: Antibiotic stewardship efforts have expanded focus from inpatient to include outpatient settings. However, stewardship is urgently needed in acute care ambulatory settings: emergency departments (EDs) and urgent care centers (UCCs). Implementation of antibiotic stewardship in acute ambulatory care settings has been limited. Two major barriers to effective implementation exist: 1) lack of adaptation of successful outpatient stewardship interventions to the acute care ambulatory setting and 2) absence of rigorous measurement of implementation processes in EDs and UCCs in a manner that informs future scale and spread. Objectives: Our objective was to apply an implementation science approach to address antibiotic overuse and inappropriate use in EDs and UCCs. Methods: This study was a redesign of an evidence-based outpatient antibiotic stewardship intervention at participating EDs and UCCs using an innovative implementation science framework (dynamic adaptation process), adaptable for local clinical workflow and local champion provision. We evaluated multiple implementation outcome metrics throughout a cluster-randomized comparative effectiveness clinical trial of two approaches to the adapted antibiotic stewardship interventions. Results: Our preimplementation phase included 21 in-depth interviews and online provider surveys (52% response rate). For the postimplementation survey, we had a 39% response rate. We identified common themes including patient expectations, lack of knowledge of existing guidelines, and maintenance of education over time. Additional themes indicated differences in modifications needed by type of clinical setting. Adoption of public commitment was high, with 79% of providers signing a commitment log, and 84% received public commitment flair. Signing of public commitment posters rate was 62%, as several sites chose not to use this component. Acceptability, fidelity, and appropriateness were also measured. Conclusions: We demonstrate that implementation science approaches can help address the problem of unnecessary antibiotic use in EDs and UCCs with high acceptability and adoption. Similar approaches could be used to tailor quality improvement interventions in these settings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075482417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075482417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/acem.13873

DO - 10.1111/acem.13873

M3 - Article

C2 - 31625653

AN - SCOPUS:85075482417

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

ER -