An impact analysis of the NEXUS Chest CT clinical decision rule

Ralph C. Wang, Matthew J. Niedzwiecki, Daniel Nishijima, Robert M. Rodriguez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The NEXUS Chest CT clinical decision rules (CDRs) have been proposed to safely guide selective chest CT use in blunt trauma evaluation. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of the NEXUS Chest CT CDR to determine its impact on missed injuries, cost, and radiation exposure. Methods: We constructed a decision model comparing two strategies: implementation of the NEXUS Chest CDR vs. usual care in the evaluation of adults with blunt trauma. We derived probabilities, clinical outcomes, effective radiation dose (ERD) from the NEXUS Chest CT validation cohort and costs from the Charge-master at the primary study site. Our primary outcomes were cost and effective radiation dose (ERD) per missed clinically significant injury (CSI). Results: Using a hypothetical cohort of 1000 adults with blunt chest trauma in each arm, the base case model projected that the implementation of the CDR would result in 161 fewer chest CTs, 0.08 additional missed CSIs, a cost savings of $136,432 and a decrease in 1435 mSv, as compared to Usual Care. To detect one additional CSI, the Usual Care strategy would require 2015 more chest CTs with a cost of $1.8 million and 17,934 mSv more radiation. Conclusions: Compared to usual care, implementation of the NEXUS Chest CT Major CDR in the evaluation of adults with blunt trauma would greatly reduce CT associated costs and radiation exposure with a slight increased risk of missed CSIs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Thorax
Wounds and Injuries
Costs and Cost Analysis
Radiation
Cost Savings
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Arm

Keywords

  • Clinical decision rule
  • Cost effectiveness
  • Trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

An impact analysis of the NEXUS Chest CT clinical decision rule. / Wang, Ralph C.; Niedzwiecki, Matthew J.; Nishijima, Daniel; Rodriguez, Robert M.

In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4393b7279d374342aa1ce1d6abd1464d,
title = "An impact analysis of the NEXUS Chest CT clinical decision rule",
abstract = "Background: The NEXUS Chest CT clinical decision rules (CDRs) have been proposed to safely guide selective chest CT use in blunt trauma evaluation. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of the NEXUS Chest CT CDR to determine its impact on missed injuries, cost, and radiation exposure. Methods: We constructed a decision model comparing two strategies: implementation of the NEXUS Chest CDR vs. usual care in the evaluation of adults with blunt trauma. We derived probabilities, clinical outcomes, effective radiation dose (ERD) from the NEXUS Chest CT validation cohort and costs from the Charge-master at the primary study site. Our primary outcomes were cost and effective radiation dose (ERD) per missed clinically significant injury (CSI). Results: Using a hypothetical cohort of 1000 adults with blunt chest trauma in each arm, the base case model projected that the implementation of the CDR would result in 161 fewer chest CTs, 0.08 additional missed CSIs, a cost savings of $136,432 and a decrease in 1435 mSv, as compared to Usual Care. To detect one additional CSI, the Usual Care strategy would require 2015 more chest CTs with a cost of $1.8 million and 17,934 mSv more radiation. Conclusions: Compared to usual care, implementation of the NEXUS Chest CT Major CDR in the evaluation of adults with blunt trauma would greatly reduce CT associated costs and radiation exposure with a slight increased risk of missed CSIs.",
keywords = "Clinical decision rule, Cost effectiveness, Trauma",
author = "Wang, {Ralph C.} and Niedzwiecki, {Matthew J.} and Daniel Nishijima and Rodriguez, {Robert M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajem.2019.07.010",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "American Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0735-6757",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An impact analysis of the NEXUS Chest CT clinical decision rule

AU - Wang, Ralph C.

AU - Niedzwiecki, Matthew J.

AU - Nishijima, Daniel

AU - Rodriguez, Robert M.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: The NEXUS Chest CT clinical decision rules (CDRs) have been proposed to safely guide selective chest CT use in blunt trauma evaluation. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of the NEXUS Chest CT CDR to determine its impact on missed injuries, cost, and radiation exposure. Methods: We constructed a decision model comparing two strategies: implementation of the NEXUS Chest CDR vs. usual care in the evaluation of adults with blunt trauma. We derived probabilities, clinical outcomes, effective radiation dose (ERD) from the NEXUS Chest CT validation cohort and costs from the Charge-master at the primary study site. Our primary outcomes were cost and effective radiation dose (ERD) per missed clinically significant injury (CSI). Results: Using a hypothetical cohort of 1000 adults with blunt chest trauma in each arm, the base case model projected that the implementation of the CDR would result in 161 fewer chest CTs, 0.08 additional missed CSIs, a cost savings of $136,432 and a decrease in 1435 mSv, as compared to Usual Care. To detect one additional CSI, the Usual Care strategy would require 2015 more chest CTs with a cost of $1.8 million and 17,934 mSv more radiation. Conclusions: Compared to usual care, implementation of the NEXUS Chest CT Major CDR in the evaluation of adults with blunt trauma would greatly reduce CT associated costs and radiation exposure with a slight increased risk of missed CSIs.

AB - Background: The NEXUS Chest CT clinical decision rules (CDRs) have been proposed to safely guide selective chest CT use in blunt trauma evaluation. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of the NEXUS Chest CT CDR to determine its impact on missed injuries, cost, and radiation exposure. Methods: We constructed a decision model comparing two strategies: implementation of the NEXUS Chest CDR vs. usual care in the evaluation of adults with blunt trauma. We derived probabilities, clinical outcomes, effective radiation dose (ERD) from the NEXUS Chest CT validation cohort and costs from the Charge-master at the primary study site. Our primary outcomes were cost and effective radiation dose (ERD) per missed clinically significant injury (CSI). Results: Using a hypothetical cohort of 1000 adults with blunt chest trauma in each arm, the base case model projected that the implementation of the CDR would result in 161 fewer chest CTs, 0.08 additional missed CSIs, a cost savings of $136,432 and a decrease in 1435 mSv, as compared to Usual Care. To detect one additional CSI, the Usual Care strategy would require 2015 more chest CTs with a cost of $1.8 million and 17,934 mSv more radiation. Conclusions: Compared to usual care, implementation of the NEXUS Chest CT Major CDR in the evaluation of adults with blunt trauma would greatly reduce CT associated costs and radiation exposure with a slight increased risk of missed CSIs.

KW - Clinical decision rule

KW - Cost effectiveness

KW - Trauma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068584576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068584576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.07.010

DO - 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.07.010

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85068584576

JO - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0735-6757

ER -