An experimental analysis of impulsivity and impulse control in humans

Jay V Solnick, Catherine H. Kannenberg, David A. Eckerman, Marcus B. Waller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

142 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In choosing between small, immediate and large, delayed reward, an organism behaves impulsively if it chooses the small reward and shows impulse control if it chooses the large reward. Work with nonhumans suggests that impulsivity and impulse control may be derived from gradients of delayed reinforcement. A model developed by Ainslie and by Rachlin suggests that preference for the rewards should be a function of when the choice is made: small reward with no delay may be preferred to large reward with delay X, but adding delay T to both alternatives should shift preference to the large reward. Three experiments investigated this preference reversal in humans, using termination of 90 dba white noise as the reinforcing event. Experiment 1 showed that under some instructional conditions 90-sec noise off with no delay was preferred over 120-sec noise off after a 60-sec delay, but that preference shifted to the large reward when a 15-sec delay (T) was added to both alternatives. Experiment 2 replicated this preference reversal under two conditions of large, delayed reward, and with three rather than two values of T. Experiment 3 confirmed this effect of T and showed that some humans committed themselves to the large reward when commitment could be made some time before presentation of the reward alternatives. These data support the Ainslie-Rachlin model and extend it to human choice behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)61-77
Number of pages17
JournalLearning and Motivation
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1980
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Impulsive Behavior
Reward
reward
experiment
Noise
Choice Behavior
reinforcement
commitment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

An experimental analysis of impulsivity and impulse control in humans. / Solnick, Jay V; Kannenberg, Catherine H.; Eckerman, David A.; Waller, Marcus B.

In: Learning and Motivation, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1980, p. 61-77.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Solnick, Jay V ; Kannenberg, Catherine H. ; Eckerman, David A. ; Waller, Marcus B. / An experimental analysis of impulsivity and impulse control in humans. In: Learning and Motivation. 1980 ; Vol. 11, No. 1. pp. 61-77.
@article{d06ac2692bf047228cd10a73f6e559eb,
title = "An experimental analysis of impulsivity and impulse control in humans",
abstract = "In choosing between small, immediate and large, delayed reward, an organism behaves impulsively if it chooses the small reward and shows impulse control if it chooses the large reward. Work with nonhumans suggests that impulsivity and impulse control may be derived from gradients of delayed reinforcement. A model developed by Ainslie and by Rachlin suggests that preference for the rewards should be a function of when the choice is made: small reward with no delay may be preferred to large reward with delay X, but adding delay T to both alternatives should shift preference to the large reward. Three experiments investigated this preference reversal in humans, using termination of 90 dba white noise as the reinforcing event. Experiment 1 showed that under some instructional conditions 90-sec noise off with no delay was preferred over 120-sec noise off after a 60-sec delay, but that preference shifted to the large reward when a 15-sec delay (T) was added to both alternatives. Experiment 2 replicated this preference reversal under two conditions of large, delayed reward, and with three rather than two values of T. Experiment 3 confirmed this effect of T and showed that some humans committed themselves to the large reward when commitment could be made some time before presentation of the reward alternatives. These data support the Ainslie-Rachlin model and extend it to human choice behavior.",
author = "Solnick, {Jay V} and Kannenberg, {Catherine H.} and Eckerman, {David A.} and Waller, {Marcus B.}",
year = "1980",
doi = "10.1016/0023-9690(80)90021-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "61--77",
journal = "Learning and Motivation",
issn = "0023-9690",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An experimental analysis of impulsivity and impulse control in humans

AU - Solnick, Jay V

AU - Kannenberg, Catherine H.

AU - Eckerman, David A.

AU - Waller, Marcus B.

PY - 1980

Y1 - 1980

N2 - In choosing between small, immediate and large, delayed reward, an organism behaves impulsively if it chooses the small reward and shows impulse control if it chooses the large reward. Work with nonhumans suggests that impulsivity and impulse control may be derived from gradients of delayed reinforcement. A model developed by Ainslie and by Rachlin suggests that preference for the rewards should be a function of when the choice is made: small reward with no delay may be preferred to large reward with delay X, but adding delay T to both alternatives should shift preference to the large reward. Three experiments investigated this preference reversal in humans, using termination of 90 dba white noise as the reinforcing event. Experiment 1 showed that under some instructional conditions 90-sec noise off with no delay was preferred over 120-sec noise off after a 60-sec delay, but that preference shifted to the large reward when a 15-sec delay (T) was added to both alternatives. Experiment 2 replicated this preference reversal under two conditions of large, delayed reward, and with three rather than two values of T. Experiment 3 confirmed this effect of T and showed that some humans committed themselves to the large reward when commitment could be made some time before presentation of the reward alternatives. These data support the Ainslie-Rachlin model and extend it to human choice behavior.

AB - In choosing between small, immediate and large, delayed reward, an organism behaves impulsively if it chooses the small reward and shows impulse control if it chooses the large reward. Work with nonhumans suggests that impulsivity and impulse control may be derived from gradients of delayed reinforcement. A model developed by Ainslie and by Rachlin suggests that preference for the rewards should be a function of when the choice is made: small reward with no delay may be preferred to large reward with delay X, but adding delay T to both alternatives should shift preference to the large reward. Three experiments investigated this preference reversal in humans, using termination of 90 dba white noise as the reinforcing event. Experiment 1 showed that under some instructional conditions 90-sec noise off with no delay was preferred over 120-sec noise off after a 60-sec delay, but that preference shifted to the large reward when a 15-sec delay (T) was added to both alternatives. Experiment 2 replicated this preference reversal under two conditions of large, delayed reward, and with three rather than two values of T. Experiment 3 confirmed this effect of T and showed that some humans committed themselves to the large reward when commitment could be made some time before presentation of the reward alternatives. These data support the Ainslie-Rachlin model and extend it to human choice behavior.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0002606251&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0002606251&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0023-9690(80)90021-1

DO - 10.1016/0023-9690(80)90021-1

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 61

EP - 77

JO - Learning and Motivation

JF - Learning and Motivation

SN - 0023-9690

IS - 1

ER -