An evaluation of agglutination and coagglutination techniques for serotyping of Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae isolates.

K. R. Mittal, Robert Higgins, S. Larivière

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A comparative evaluation of rapid slide agglutination, tube agglutination, 2-mercaptoethanol tube agglutination, and coagglutination tests was made for serotyping isolates of Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae. The results indicated that a majority of the isolates could be serotyped by any of these tests. But, it was not uncommon to find isolates which were inagglutinable or poorly agglutinable in homologous sera. Heat treatment of whole-cell suspensions of such isolates was essential to unmask the serotype-specific antigenic determinants; however, in the process of heat treatment, cross-reactive common antigens of minor nature were also exposed. The antibodies involved in such cross-reactions were mainly of immunoglobulin M type, because the cross-reactivities were completely abolished in coagglutination and 2-mercaptoethanol agglutination tests. Thus, both these tests were satisfactory for serotyping inagglutinable mucoid strains. For serotyping strains which were either polyagglutinating or autoagglutinating, agglutination tests could not be used, but the coagglutination test proved to be satisfactory. The coagglutination test was serotype-specific, sensitive, simple, rapid, reproducible, and easier to read and interpret than rapid slide or tube agglutination tests. This test could be used to serotype mucoid, smooth, or rough isolates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)219-226
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Veterinary Research
Volume48
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 1 1987
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae
Serotyping
Agglutination Tests
Agglutination
agglutination
Mercaptoethanol
agglutination tests
serotypes
Hot Temperature
testing
cross reaction
Cross Reactions
methodology
heat treatment
Immunoglobulin M
immunoglobulin M
Epitopes
Suspensions
Antigens
cell suspension culture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

An evaluation of agglutination and coagglutination techniques for serotyping of Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae isolates. / Mittal, K. R.; Higgins, Robert; Larivière, S.

In: American Journal of Veterinary Research, Vol. 48, No. 2, 01.02.1987, p. 219-226.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{481adad00fdd42678169816bc3d07913,
title = "An evaluation of agglutination and coagglutination techniques for serotyping of Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae isolates.",
abstract = "A comparative evaluation of rapid slide agglutination, tube agglutination, 2-mercaptoethanol tube agglutination, and coagglutination tests was made for serotyping isolates of Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae. The results indicated that a majority of the isolates could be serotyped by any of these tests. But, it was not uncommon to find isolates which were inagglutinable or poorly agglutinable in homologous sera. Heat treatment of whole-cell suspensions of such isolates was essential to unmask the serotype-specific antigenic determinants; however, in the process of heat treatment, cross-reactive common antigens of minor nature were also exposed. The antibodies involved in such cross-reactions were mainly of immunoglobulin M type, because the cross-reactivities were completely abolished in coagglutination and 2-mercaptoethanol agglutination tests. Thus, both these tests were satisfactory for serotyping inagglutinable mucoid strains. For serotyping strains which were either polyagglutinating or autoagglutinating, agglutination tests could not be used, but the coagglutination test proved to be satisfactory. The coagglutination test was serotype-specific, sensitive, simple, rapid, reproducible, and easier to read and interpret than rapid slide or tube agglutination tests. This test could be used to serotype mucoid, smooth, or rough isolates.",
author = "Mittal, {K. R.} and Robert Higgins and S. Larivi{\`e}re",
year = "1987",
month = "2",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "219--226",
journal = "American Journal of Veterinary Research",
issn = "0002-9645",
publisher = "American Veterinary Medical Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An evaluation of agglutination and coagglutination techniques for serotyping of Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae isolates.

AU - Mittal, K. R.

AU - Higgins, Robert

AU - Larivière, S.

PY - 1987/2/1

Y1 - 1987/2/1

N2 - A comparative evaluation of rapid slide agglutination, tube agglutination, 2-mercaptoethanol tube agglutination, and coagglutination tests was made for serotyping isolates of Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae. The results indicated that a majority of the isolates could be serotyped by any of these tests. But, it was not uncommon to find isolates which were inagglutinable or poorly agglutinable in homologous sera. Heat treatment of whole-cell suspensions of such isolates was essential to unmask the serotype-specific antigenic determinants; however, in the process of heat treatment, cross-reactive common antigens of minor nature were also exposed. The antibodies involved in such cross-reactions were mainly of immunoglobulin M type, because the cross-reactivities were completely abolished in coagglutination and 2-mercaptoethanol agglutination tests. Thus, both these tests were satisfactory for serotyping inagglutinable mucoid strains. For serotyping strains which were either polyagglutinating or autoagglutinating, agglutination tests could not be used, but the coagglutination test proved to be satisfactory. The coagglutination test was serotype-specific, sensitive, simple, rapid, reproducible, and easier to read and interpret than rapid slide or tube agglutination tests. This test could be used to serotype mucoid, smooth, or rough isolates.

AB - A comparative evaluation of rapid slide agglutination, tube agglutination, 2-mercaptoethanol tube agglutination, and coagglutination tests was made for serotyping isolates of Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae. The results indicated that a majority of the isolates could be serotyped by any of these tests. But, it was not uncommon to find isolates which were inagglutinable or poorly agglutinable in homologous sera. Heat treatment of whole-cell suspensions of such isolates was essential to unmask the serotype-specific antigenic determinants; however, in the process of heat treatment, cross-reactive common antigens of minor nature were also exposed. The antibodies involved in such cross-reactions were mainly of immunoglobulin M type, because the cross-reactivities were completely abolished in coagglutination and 2-mercaptoethanol agglutination tests. Thus, both these tests were satisfactory for serotyping inagglutinable mucoid strains. For serotyping strains which were either polyagglutinating or autoagglutinating, agglutination tests could not be used, but the coagglutination test proved to be satisfactory. The coagglutination test was serotype-specific, sensitive, simple, rapid, reproducible, and easier to read and interpret than rapid slide or tube agglutination tests. This test could be used to serotype mucoid, smooth, or rough isolates.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023283610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023283610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 219

EP - 226

JO - American Journal of Veterinary Research

JF - American Journal of Veterinary Research

SN - 0002-9645

IS - 2

ER -