An Estimate of the U.S. Government's Undercount of Nonfatal Occupational Injuries

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

182 Scopus citations

Abstract

Debate surrounds the size of the underestimate of nonfatal occupational injuries produced by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). We developed models that separated categories of injuries: BLS Annual Survey, federal government, agriculture, state and local government, self-employed outside agriculture, and all other. The models generated varying estimates depending on the assumptions for each category pertaining to job risks and amount of underreporting. We offered justification for the assumptions based on published studies as well as our own analyses of BLS data. The models suggested the Annual Survey missed from 0% to 70% of the number of injuries (from private firms, excluding the self-employed) it was designed to capture. However, when we included firms and governments the Annual Survey was not designed to capture, and considered reasonable assumptions regarding underreporting, we estimated the BLS missed between 33% and 69% of all injuries. We concluded that there was substantial undercapture in the BLS Annual Survey, some due to the excluded categories of government workers and the self-employed, as well as some due to underreporting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)10-18
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2004

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'An Estimate of the U.S. Government's Undercount of Nonfatal Occupational Injuries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this