An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the determination of dioxins in contaminated sediment and soil samples

Jeanette M Van Emon, Jane C. Chuang, Robert A. Lordo, Mary E. Schrock, Mikaela Nichkova, Shirley J. Gee, Bruce D. Hammock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A 96-microwell enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method was evaluated to determine PCDDs/PCDFs in sediment and soil samples from an EPA Superfund site. Samples were prepared and analyzed by both the ELISA and a gas chromatography/high resolution mass spectrometry (GC/HRMS) method. Comparable method precision, accuracy, and detection level (8 ng kg-1) were achieved by the ELISA method with respect to GC/HRMS. However, the extraction and cleanup method developed for the ELISA requires refinement for the soil type that yielded a waxy residue after sample processing. Four types of statistical analyses (Pearson correlation coefficient, paired t-test, nonparametric tests, and McNemar's test of association) were performed to determine whether the two methods produced statistically different results. The log-transformed ELISA-derived 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin values and log-transformed GC/HRMS-derived TEQ values were significantly correlated (r = 0.79) at the 0.05 level. The median difference in values between ELISA and GC/HRMS was not significant at the 0.05 level. Low false negative and false positive rates (<10%) were observed for the ELISA when compared to the GC/HRMS at 1000 ng TEQ kg-1. The findings suggest that immunochemical technology could be a complementary monitoring tool for determining concentrations at the 1000 ng TEQ kg-1 action level for contaminated sediment and soil. The ELISA could also be used in an analytical triage approach to screen and rank samples prior to instrumental analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)95-103
Number of pages9
JournalChemosphere
Volume72
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2008

Fingerprint

Immunosorbents
Dioxins
dioxin
Assays
Sediments
Soil
Enzymes
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
assay
enzyme
Soils
Gas chromatography
Gas Chromatography
Mass spectrometry
Mass Spectrometry
gas chromatography
mass spectrometry
sediment
soil
Superfund

Keywords

  • 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
  • GC/HRMS
  • Immunoassay
  • PCDD
  • PCDF
  • TCDD

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Emon, J. M. V., Chuang, J. C., Lordo, R. A., Schrock, M. E., Nichkova, M., Gee, S. J., & Hammock, B. D. (2008). An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the determination of dioxins in contaminated sediment and soil samples. Chemosphere, 72(1), 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.01.012

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the determination of dioxins in contaminated sediment and soil samples. / Emon, Jeanette M Van; Chuang, Jane C.; Lordo, Robert A.; Schrock, Mary E.; Nichkova, Mikaela; Gee, Shirley J.; Hammock, Bruce D.

In: Chemosphere, Vol. 72, No. 1, 05.2008, p. 95-103.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Emon, JMV, Chuang, JC, Lordo, RA, Schrock, ME, Nichkova, M, Gee, SJ & Hammock, BD 2008, 'An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the determination of dioxins in contaminated sediment and soil samples', Chemosphere, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.01.012
Emon, Jeanette M Van ; Chuang, Jane C. ; Lordo, Robert A. ; Schrock, Mary E. ; Nichkova, Mikaela ; Gee, Shirley J. ; Hammock, Bruce D. / An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the determination of dioxins in contaminated sediment and soil samples. In: Chemosphere. 2008 ; Vol. 72, No. 1. pp. 95-103.
@article{cb2e8a333a6b4311be6e0fd4a80ce5d8,
title = "An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the determination of dioxins in contaminated sediment and soil samples",
abstract = "A 96-microwell enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method was evaluated to determine PCDDs/PCDFs in sediment and soil samples from an EPA Superfund site. Samples were prepared and analyzed by both the ELISA and a gas chromatography/high resolution mass spectrometry (GC/HRMS) method. Comparable method precision, accuracy, and detection level (8 ng kg-1) were achieved by the ELISA method with respect to GC/HRMS. However, the extraction and cleanup method developed for the ELISA requires refinement for the soil type that yielded a waxy residue after sample processing. Four types of statistical analyses (Pearson correlation coefficient, paired t-test, nonparametric tests, and McNemar's test of association) were performed to determine whether the two methods produced statistically different results. The log-transformed ELISA-derived 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin values and log-transformed GC/HRMS-derived TEQ values were significantly correlated (r = 0.79) at the 0.05 level. The median difference in values between ELISA and GC/HRMS was not significant at the 0.05 level. Low false negative and false positive rates (<10{\%}) were observed for the ELISA when compared to the GC/HRMS at 1000 ng TEQ kg-1. The findings suggest that immunochemical technology could be a complementary monitoring tool for determining concentrations at the 1000 ng TEQ kg-1 action level for contaminated sediment and soil. The ELISA could also be used in an analytical triage approach to screen and rank samples prior to instrumental analysis.",
keywords = "2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, GC/HRMS, Immunoassay, PCDD, PCDF, TCDD",
author = "Emon, {Jeanette M Van} and Chuang, {Jane C.} and Lordo, {Robert A.} and Schrock, {Mary E.} and Mikaela Nichkova and Gee, {Shirley J.} and Hammock, {Bruce D.}",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.01.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "72",
pages = "95--103",
journal = "Chemosphere",
issn = "0045-6535",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the determination of dioxins in contaminated sediment and soil samples

AU - Emon, Jeanette M Van

AU - Chuang, Jane C.

AU - Lordo, Robert A.

AU - Schrock, Mary E.

AU - Nichkova, Mikaela

AU - Gee, Shirley J.

AU - Hammock, Bruce D.

PY - 2008/5

Y1 - 2008/5

N2 - A 96-microwell enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method was evaluated to determine PCDDs/PCDFs in sediment and soil samples from an EPA Superfund site. Samples were prepared and analyzed by both the ELISA and a gas chromatography/high resolution mass spectrometry (GC/HRMS) method. Comparable method precision, accuracy, and detection level (8 ng kg-1) were achieved by the ELISA method with respect to GC/HRMS. However, the extraction and cleanup method developed for the ELISA requires refinement for the soil type that yielded a waxy residue after sample processing. Four types of statistical analyses (Pearson correlation coefficient, paired t-test, nonparametric tests, and McNemar's test of association) were performed to determine whether the two methods produced statistically different results. The log-transformed ELISA-derived 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin values and log-transformed GC/HRMS-derived TEQ values were significantly correlated (r = 0.79) at the 0.05 level. The median difference in values between ELISA and GC/HRMS was not significant at the 0.05 level. Low false negative and false positive rates (<10%) were observed for the ELISA when compared to the GC/HRMS at 1000 ng TEQ kg-1. The findings suggest that immunochemical technology could be a complementary monitoring tool for determining concentrations at the 1000 ng TEQ kg-1 action level for contaminated sediment and soil. The ELISA could also be used in an analytical triage approach to screen and rank samples prior to instrumental analysis.

AB - A 96-microwell enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method was evaluated to determine PCDDs/PCDFs in sediment and soil samples from an EPA Superfund site. Samples were prepared and analyzed by both the ELISA and a gas chromatography/high resolution mass spectrometry (GC/HRMS) method. Comparable method precision, accuracy, and detection level (8 ng kg-1) were achieved by the ELISA method with respect to GC/HRMS. However, the extraction and cleanup method developed for the ELISA requires refinement for the soil type that yielded a waxy residue after sample processing. Four types of statistical analyses (Pearson correlation coefficient, paired t-test, nonparametric tests, and McNemar's test of association) were performed to determine whether the two methods produced statistically different results. The log-transformed ELISA-derived 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin values and log-transformed GC/HRMS-derived TEQ values were significantly correlated (r = 0.79) at the 0.05 level. The median difference in values between ELISA and GC/HRMS was not significant at the 0.05 level. Low false negative and false positive rates (<10%) were observed for the ELISA when compared to the GC/HRMS at 1000 ng TEQ kg-1. The findings suggest that immunochemical technology could be a complementary monitoring tool for determining concentrations at the 1000 ng TEQ kg-1 action level for contaminated sediment and soil. The ELISA could also be used in an analytical triage approach to screen and rank samples prior to instrumental analysis.

KW - 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin

KW - GC/HRMS

KW - Immunoassay

KW - PCDD

KW - PCDF

KW - TCDD

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42749084251&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=42749084251&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.01.012

DO - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.01.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 18313102

AN - SCOPUS:42749084251

VL - 72

SP - 95

EP - 103

JO - Chemosphere

JF - Chemosphere

SN - 0045-6535

IS - 1

ER -