An analysis of cost and clinical outcome in palliation for advanced pancreatic cancer

Melinda M. Mortenson, Hung S Ho, Richard J Bold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The optimal palliative method for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer remains controversial. Methods: A retrospective chart review evaluated patients who underwent exploration for presumed resectable pancreatic cancer. Cost-based analysis was performed using relative value units (RVUs) that included the initial surgical procedure and any additional procedure required to achieve satisfactory palliation. Results: Of 96 patients (1993-2002), 6% had biliary bypass, 42% had duodenal bypass, 40% had double bypass, and 13% had no procedure with equivalent clinical outcomes. If biliary bypass was not initially performed, there was a significant incidence of biliary complications before definitive endoscopic stenting (P = .01). If duodenal bypass was not initially performed, 11% developed duodenal obstruction (P = .04). Total RVUs was highest for a double bypass and lowest for no initial surgical palliative procedure. Conclusions: Although surgical bypass procedures at initial exploration provide durable palliation, these procedures are associated with greater costs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)406-411
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume190
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2005

Fingerprint

Pancreatic Neoplasms
Costs and Cost Analysis
Duodenal Obstruction
Incidence

Keywords

  • Biliary obstruction
  • Gastric outlet obstruction
  • Pancreatic cancer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

An analysis of cost and clinical outcome in palliation for advanced pancreatic cancer. / Mortenson, Melinda M.; Ho, Hung S; Bold, Richard J.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 190, No. 3, 09.2005, p. 406-411.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bfde5c9242374edc9a25704531ebf822,
title = "An analysis of cost and clinical outcome in palliation for advanced pancreatic cancer",
abstract = "Background: The optimal palliative method for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer remains controversial. Methods: A retrospective chart review evaluated patients who underwent exploration for presumed resectable pancreatic cancer. Cost-based analysis was performed using relative value units (RVUs) that included the initial surgical procedure and any additional procedure required to achieve satisfactory palliation. Results: Of 96 patients (1993-2002), 6{\%} had biliary bypass, 42{\%} had duodenal bypass, 40{\%} had double bypass, and 13{\%} had no procedure with equivalent clinical outcomes. If biliary bypass was not initially performed, there was a significant incidence of biliary complications before definitive endoscopic stenting (P = .01). If duodenal bypass was not initially performed, 11{\%} developed duodenal obstruction (P = .04). Total RVUs was highest for a double bypass and lowest for no initial surgical palliative procedure. Conclusions: Although surgical bypass procedures at initial exploration provide durable palliation, these procedures are associated with greater costs.",
keywords = "Biliary obstruction, Gastric outlet obstruction, Pancreatic cancer",
author = "Mortenson, {Melinda M.} and Ho, {Hung S} and Bold, {Richard J}",
year = "2005",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.03.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "190",
pages = "406--411",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An analysis of cost and clinical outcome in palliation for advanced pancreatic cancer

AU - Mortenson, Melinda M.

AU - Ho, Hung S

AU - Bold, Richard J

PY - 2005/9

Y1 - 2005/9

N2 - Background: The optimal palliative method for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer remains controversial. Methods: A retrospective chart review evaluated patients who underwent exploration for presumed resectable pancreatic cancer. Cost-based analysis was performed using relative value units (RVUs) that included the initial surgical procedure and any additional procedure required to achieve satisfactory palliation. Results: Of 96 patients (1993-2002), 6% had biliary bypass, 42% had duodenal bypass, 40% had double bypass, and 13% had no procedure with equivalent clinical outcomes. If biliary bypass was not initially performed, there was a significant incidence of biliary complications before definitive endoscopic stenting (P = .01). If duodenal bypass was not initially performed, 11% developed duodenal obstruction (P = .04). Total RVUs was highest for a double bypass and lowest for no initial surgical palliative procedure. Conclusions: Although surgical bypass procedures at initial exploration provide durable palliation, these procedures are associated with greater costs.

AB - Background: The optimal palliative method for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer remains controversial. Methods: A retrospective chart review evaluated patients who underwent exploration for presumed resectable pancreatic cancer. Cost-based analysis was performed using relative value units (RVUs) that included the initial surgical procedure and any additional procedure required to achieve satisfactory palliation. Results: Of 96 patients (1993-2002), 6% had biliary bypass, 42% had duodenal bypass, 40% had double bypass, and 13% had no procedure with equivalent clinical outcomes. If biliary bypass was not initially performed, there was a significant incidence of biliary complications before definitive endoscopic stenting (P = .01). If duodenal bypass was not initially performed, 11% developed duodenal obstruction (P = .04). Total RVUs was highest for a double bypass and lowest for no initial surgical palliative procedure. Conclusions: Although surgical bypass procedures at initial exploration provide durable palliation, these procedures are associated with greater costs.

KW - Biliary obstruction

KW - Gastric outlet obstruction

KW - Pancreatic cancer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23744489392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23744489392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.03.014

DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.03.014

M3 - Article

VL - 190

SP - 406

EP - 411

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 3

ER -