Amplified androstenedione enzymeimmunoassay for the diagnosis of cryptorchidism in the male horse: Comparison with testosterone and estrone sulphate methods

J. C. Illera, G. Silván, C. J. Munro, P. L. Lorenzo, M. J. Illera, Irwin Liu, M. Illera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An amplified enzymeimmunoassay (EIA) was validated for androstenedione in the serum of male horses. We will use the assay as a tool for the diagnosis of equine cryptorchidism. We will compare androstenedione EIA to the currently used methods (testosterone and estrone sulphate determinations). The study was conducted on 115 horses of pure Spanish and Arabian breeds, that included 30 geldings, 60 bilateral cryptorchids and 25 stallions. Androstenedione standard curve covered a range between 0 and 1ng per well. Low detection limit was 1.54pg/ml. Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation (CV%) were <8.2 and <9.3, respectively (n=10). Recovery rate of known androstenedione concentrations averaged from 96.62±2.69 to 97.63±1.87%. Androstenedione mean±S.E. serum concentrations were 10.52±1.36ng/ml in stallions (n=25), 0.51±0.04ng/ml in cryptorchids (n=60), and 0.03±0.01ng/ml in geldings (n=30). Diagnostic validation parameters in basal samples showed for estrone sulphate the lower positive predictive value (0.85) with the higher number of false positives, and lower specificity (0.84). Testosterone showed the higher number of false negatives with a negative predictive value of 0.85, and lower sensitivity (0.85). Among the three hormones evaluated, androstenedione presented the best results with the smaller number of horses diagnosed as false positives (0.93) or negatives (0.91). This technique also resulted in higher sensitivity, specificity and efficiency over the other two methods assayed. We concluded that our amplified EIA is a highly sensitive and specific assay that provides a rapid, simple, and inexpensive alternative to other methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)377-382
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Volume84
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

Cryptorchidism
Androstenedione
Horses
Testosterone
Assays
Serum
Limit of Detection
estrone sulfate
Hormones
Sensitivity and Specificity
Recovery

Keywords

  • Androstenedione
  • EIA
  • Equine cryptorchidism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Medicine
  • Molecular Biology
  • Endocrinology
  • Clinical Biochemistry
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Amplified androstenedione enzymeimmunoassay for the diagnosis of cryptorchidism in the male horse : Comparison with testosterone and estrone sulphate methods. / Illera, J. C.; Silván, G.; Munro, C. J.; Lorenzo, P. L.; Illera, M. J.; Liu, Irwin; Illera, M.

In: Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Vol. 84, No. 2-3, 01.01.2003, p. 377-382.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{012c95e4e5704fa6acde95db4c451d0d,
title = "Amplified androstenedione enzymeimmunoassay for the diagnosis of cryptorchidism in the male horse: Comparison with testosterone and estrone sulphate methods",
abstract = "An amplified enzymeimmunoassay (EIA) was validated for androstenedione in the serum of male horses. We will use the assay as a tool for the diagnosis of equine cryptorchidism. We will compare androstenedione EIA to the currently used methods (testosterone and estrone sulphate determinations). The study was conducted on 115 horses of pure Spanish and Arabian breeds, that included 30 geldings, 60 bilateral cryptorchids and 25 stallions. Androstenedione standard curve covered a range between 0 and 1ng per well. Low detection limit was 1.54pg/ml. Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation (CV{\%}) were <8.2 and <9.3, respectively (n=10). Recovery rate of known androstenedione concentrations averaged from 96.62±2.69 to 97.63±1.87{\%}. Androstenedione mean±S.E. serum concentrations were 10.52±1.36ng/ml in stallions (n=25), 0.51±0.04ng/ml in cryptorchids (n=60), and 0.03±0.01ng/ml in geldings (n=30). Diagnostic validation parameters in basal samples showed for estrone sulphate the lower positive predictive value (0.85) with the higher number of false positives, and lower specificity (0.84). Testosterone showed the higher number of false negatives with a negative predictive value of 0.85, and lower sensitivity (0.85). Among the three hormones evaluated, androstenedione presented the best results with the smaller number of horses diagnosed as false positives (0.93) or negatives (0.91). This technique also resulted in higher sensitivity, specificity and efficiency over the other two methods assayed. We concluded that our amplified EIA is a highly sensitive and specific assay that provides a rapid, simple, and inexpensive alternative to other methods.",
keywords = "Androstenedione, EIA, Equine cryptorchidism",
author = "Illera, {J. C.} and G. Silv{\'a}n and Munro, {C. J.} and Lorenzo, {P. L.} and Illera, {M. J.} and Irwin Liu and M. Illera",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0960-0760(03)00057-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "377--382",
journal = "Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology",
issn = "0960-0760",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Amplified androstenedione enzymeimmunoassay for the diagnosis of cryptorchidism in the male horse

T2 - Comparison with testosterone and estrone sulphate methods

AU - Illera, J. C.

AU - Silván, G.

AU - Munro, C. J.

AU - Lorenzo, P. L.

AU - Illera, M. J.

AU - Liu, Irwin

AU - Illera, M.

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - An amplified enzymeimmunoassay (EIA) was validated for androstenedione in the serum of male horses. We will use the assay as a tool for the diagnosis of equine cryptorchidism. We will compare androstenedione EIA to the currently used methods (testosterone and estrone sulphate determinations). The study was conducted on 115 horses of pure Spanish and Arabian breeds, that included 30 geldings, 60 bilateral cryptorchids and 25 stallions. Androstenedione standard curve covered a range between 0 and 1ng per well. Low detection limit was 1.54pg/ml. Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation (CV%) were <8.2 and <9.3, respectively (n=10). Recovery rate of known androstenedione concentrations averaged from 96.62±2.69 to 97.63±1.87%. Androstenedione mean±S.E. serum concentrations were 10.52±1.36ng/ml in stallions (n=25), 0.51±0.04ng/ml in cryptorchids (n=60), and 0.03±0.01ng/ml in geldings (n=30). Diagnostic validation parameters in basal samples showed for estrone sulphate the lower positive predictive value (0.85) with the higher number of false positives, and lower specificity (0.84). Testosterone showed the higher number of false negatives with a negative predictive value of 0.85, and lower sensitivity (0.85). Among the three hormones evaluated, androstenedione presented the best results with the smaller number of horses diagnosed as false positives (0.93) or negatives (0.91). This technique also resulted in higher sensitivity, specificity and efficiency over the other two methods assayed. We concluded that our amplified EIA is a highly sensitive and specific assay that provides a rapid, simple, and inexpensive alternative to other methods.

AB - An amplified enzymeimmunoassay (EIA) was validated for androstenedione in the serum of male horses. We will use the assay as a tool for the diagnosis of equine cryptorchidism. We will compare androstenedione EIA to the currently used methods (testosterone and estrone sulphate determinations). The study was conducted on 115 horses of pure Spanish and Arabian breeds, that included 30 geldings, 60 bilateral cryptorchids and 25 stallions. Androstenedione standard curve covered a range between 0 and 1ng per well. Low detection limit was 1.54pg/ml. Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation (CV%) were <8.2 and <9.3, respectively (n=10). Recovery rate of known androstenedione concentrations averaged from 96.62±2.69 to 97.63±1.87%. Androstenedione mean±S.E. serum concentrations were 10.52±1.36ng/ml in stallions (n=25), 0.51±0.04ng/ml in cryptorchids (n=60), and 0.03±0.01ng/ml in geldings (n=30). Diagnostic validation parameters in basal samples showed for estrone sulphate the lower positive predictive value (0.85) with the higher number of false positives, and lower specificity (0.84). Testosterone showed the higher number of false negatives with a negative predictive value of 0.85, and lower sensitivity (0.85). Among the three hormones evaluated, androstenedione presented the best results with the smaller number of horses diagnosed as false positives (0.93) or negatives (0.91). This technique also resulted in higher sensitivity, specificity and efficiency over the other two methods assayed. We concluded that our amplified EIA is a highly sensitive and specific assay that provides a rapid, simple, and inexpensive alternative to other methods.

KW - Androstenedione

KW - EIA

KW - Equine cryptorchidism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037318832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037318832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0960-0760(03)00057-8

DO - 10.1016/S0960-0760(03)00057-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 12711026

AN - SCOPUS:0037318832

VL - 84

SP - 377

EP - 382

JO - Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

JF - Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

SN - 0960-0760

IS - 2-3

ER -