American association of physicists in medicine radiation therapy committee task group 53

Quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning

Benedick Fraass, Karen Doppke, Margie Hunt, Gerald Kutcher, George Starkschall, Robin L Stern, Jake Van Dyke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

514 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In recent years, the sophistication and complexity of clinical treatment planning and treatment planning systems has increased significantly, particularly including three-dimensional (3D) treatment planning systems, and the use of conformal treatment planning and delivery techniques. This has led to the need for a comprehensive set of quality assurance (QA) guidelines that can be applied to clinical treatment planning. This document is the report of Task Group 53 of the Radiation Therapy Committee of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. The purpose of this report is to guide and assist the clinical medical physicist in developing and implementing a comprehensive but viable program of quality-assurance for modern radiotherapy treatment planning. The scope of the QA needs for treatment planning is quite broad, encompassing image-based definition of patient anatomy, 3D beam descriptions for complex beams including multileaf collimator apertures, 3D dose calculation algorithms, and complex plan evaluation tools including dose volume histograms. The Task Group recommends an organizational framework for the task of creating a QA program which is individualized to the needs of each institution and addresses the issues of acceptance testing, commissioning the planning system and planning process, routine quality assurance, and ongoing QA of the planning process. This report, while not prescribing specific QA tests, provides the framework and guidance to allow radiation oncology physicists to design comprehensive and practical treatment planning QA programs for their clinics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1773-1829
Number of pages57
JournalMedical Physics
Volume25
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1998

Fingerprint

Radiotherapy
Medicine
Therapeutics
Planning Techniques
Radiation Oncology
Anatomy
Guidelines

Keywords

  • 3D treatment planning
  • Quality assurance
  • Treatment planning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics

Cite this

American association of physicists in medicine radiation therapy committee task group 53 : Quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning. / Fraass, Benedick; Doppke, Karen; Hunt, Margie; Kutcher, Gerald; Starkschall, George; Stern, Robin L; Van Dyke, Jake.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 25, No. 10, 10.1998, p. 1773-1829.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fraass, Benedick ; Doppke, Karen ; Hunt, Margie ; Kutcher, Gerald ; Starkschall, George ; Stern, Robin L ; Van Dyke, Jake. / American association of physicists in medicine radiation therapy committee task group 53 : Quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning. In: Medical Physics. 1998 ; Vol. 25, No. 10. pp. 1773-1829.
@article{121238b4322e4f158a7c08ac3bdbe3aa,
title = "American association of physicists in medicine radiation therapy committee task group 53: Quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning",
abstract = "In recent years, the sophistication and complexity of clinical treatment planning and treatment planning systems has increased significantly, particularly including three-dimensional (3D) treatment planning systems, and the use of conformal treatment planning and delivery techniques. This has led to the need for a comprehensive set of quality assurance (QA) guidelines that can be applied to clinical treatment planning. This document is the report of Task Group 53 of the Radiation Therapy Committee of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. The purpose of this report is to guide and assist the clinical medical physicist in developing and implementing a comprehensive but viable program of quality-assurance for modern radiotherapy treatment planning. The scope of the QA needs for treatment planning is quite broad, encompassing image-based definition of patient anatomy, 3D beam descriptions for complex beams including multileaf collimator apertures, 3D dose calculation algorithms, and complex plan evaluation tools including dose volume histograms. The Task Group recommends an organizational framework for the task of creating a QA program which is individualized to the needs of each institution and addresses the issues of acceptance testing, commissioning the planning system and planning process, routine quality assurance, and ongoing QA of the planning process. This report, while not prescribing specific QA tests, provides the framework and guidance to allow radiation oncology physicists to design comprehensive and practical treatment planning QA programs for their clinics.",
keywords = "3D treatment planning, Quality assurance, Treatment planning",
author = "Benedick Fraass and Karen Doppke and Margie Hunt and Gerald Kutcher and George Starkschall and Stern, {Robin L} and {Van Dyke}, Jake",
year = "1998",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1118/1.598373",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "1773--1829",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - American association of physicists in medicine radiation therapy committee task group 53

T2 - Quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning

AU - Fraass, Benedick

AU - Doppke, Karen

AU - Hunt, Margie

AU - Kutcher, Gerald

AU - Starkschall, George

AU - Stern, Robin L

AU - Van Dyke, Jake

PY - 1998/10

Y1 - 1998/10

N2 - In recent years, the sophistication and complexity of clinical treatment planning and treatment planning systems has increased significantly, particularly including three-dimensional (3D) treatment planning systems, and the use of conformal treatment planning and delivery techniques. This has led to the need for a comprehensive set of quality assurance (QA) guidelines that can be applied to clinical treatment planning. This document is the report of Task Group 53 of the Radiation Therapy Committee of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. The purpose of this report is to guide and assist the clinical medical physicist in developing and implementing a comprehensive but viable program of quality-assurance for modern radiotherapy treatment planning. The scope of the QA needs for treatment planning is quite broad, encompassing image-based definition of patient anatomy, 3D beam descriptions for complex beams including multileaf collimator apertures, 3D dose calculation algorithms, and complex plan evaluation tools including dose volume histograms. The Task Group recommends an organizational framework for the task of creating a QA program which is individualized to the needs of each institution and addresses the issues of acceptance testing, commissioning the planning system and planning process, routine quality assurance, and ongoing QA of the planning process. This report, while not prescribing specific QA tests, provides the framework and guidance to allow radiation oncology physicists to design comprehensive and practical treatment planning QA programs for their clinics.

AB - In recent years, the sophistication and complexity of clinical treatment planning and treatment planning systems has increased significantly, particularly including three-dimensional (3D) treatment planning systems, and the use of conformal treatment planning and delivery techniques. This has led to the need for a comprehensive set of quality assurance (QA) guidelines that can be applied to clinical treatment planning. This document is the report of Task Group 53 of the Radiation Therapy Committee of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. The purpose of this report is to guide and assist the clinical medical physicist in developing and implementing a comprehensive but viable program of quality-assurance for modern radiotherapy treatment planning. The scope of the QA needs for treatment planning is quite broad, encompassing image-based definition of patient anatomy, 3D beam descriptions for complex beams including multileaf collimator apertures, 3D dose calculation algorithms, and complex plan evaluation tools including dose volume histograms. The Task Group recommends an organizational framework for the task of creating a QA program which is individualized to the needs of each institution and addresses the issues of acceptance testing, commissioning the planning system and planning process, routine quality assurance, and ongoing QA of the planning process. This report, while not prescribing specific QA tests, provides the framework and guidance to allow radiation oncology physicists to design comprehensive and practical treatment planning QA programs for their clinics.

KW - 3D treatment planning

KW - Quality assurance

KW - Treatment planning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031789601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031789601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.598373

DO - 10.1118/1.598373

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 1773

EP - 1829

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 10

ER -