Allergic contact dermatitis to synthetic rubber gloves: Changing trends in patch test reactions to accelerators

Lauren Y. Cao, James S. Taylor, Apra Sood, Debora Murray, Paul D. Siegel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Rubber gloves are one of the most frequent causes of occupational allergic contact dermatitis, especially in health care workers. Observations: We describe 23 patients with allergic contact dermatitis due to rubber accelerators in rubber gloves, some with disseminated dermatitis, treated during a 2-year period. Three had IgE-mediated latex allergies. Sixteen were health care workers from a single institution whose dermatitis was temporally related to the switch to latex-safe gloves. Each had positive patch test reactions to 1 or more rubber accelerators, including carbamates, thiurams, 2-mercaptobenzothiazole, and 1,3-diphenylguanidine. Chemical analysis of 6 glove samples identified 2-mercaptobenzothiazole in 4 and zinc diethyldithiocarbamate in 1. There were discordances between patch test results for glove chemicals and glove swatches and between available information on chemicals used during glove production and chemicals detected during glove analysis. Although these factors may complicate the search for culprit and alternative gloves, dermatitis cleared in each of 9 patients with follow-up data and for whom alternative gloves were provided based on published information of glove composition. Conclusions: Allergic contact dermatitis due to synthetic rubber gloves occurs even with the use of latex-safe products. More knowledge about chemicals present in these gloves, to which the skin is exposed during use, is necessary to prevent and treat allergic contact dermatitis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1001-1007
Number of pages7
JournalArchives of Dermatology
Volume146
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Elastomers
Allergic Contact Dermatitis
Patch Tests
Rubber
Dermatitis
Latex
Thiram
Latex Hypersensitivity
Delivery of Health Care
Ditiocarb
Carbamates
Immunoglobulin E
Skin
captax

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology

Cite this

Allergic contact dermatitis to synthetic rubber gloves : Changing trends in patch test reactions to accelerators. / Cao, Lauren Y.; Taylor, James S.; Sood, Apra; Murray, Debora; Siegel, Paul D.

In: Archives of Dermatology, Vol. 146, No. 9, 01.01.2010, p. 1001-1007.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cao, Lauren Y. ; Taylor, James S. ; Sood, Apra ; Murray, Debora ; Siegel, Paul D. / Allergic contact dermatitis to synthetic rubber gloves : Changing trends in patch test reactions to accelerators. In: Archives of Dermatology. 2010 ; Vol. 146, No. 9. pp. 1001-1007.
@article{f54f334c142a4c8aa32fce39bbdbec2e,
title = "Allergic contact dermatitis to synthetic rubber gloves: Changing trends in patch test reactions to accelerators",
abstract = "Background: Rubber gloves are one of the most frequent causes of occupational allergic contact dermatitis, especially in health care workers. Observations: We describe 23 patients with allergic contact dermatitis due to rubber accelerators in rubber gloves, some with disseminated dermatitis, treated during a 2-year period. Three had IgE-mediated latex allergies. Sixteen were health care workers from a single institution whose dermatitis was temporally related to the switch to latex-safe gloves. Each had positive patch test reactions to 1 or more rubber accelerators, including carbamates, thiurams, 2-mercaptobenzothiazole, and 1,3-diphenylguanidine. Chemical analysis of 6 glove samples identified 2-mercaptobenzothiazole in 4 and zinc diethyldithiocarbamate in 1. There were discordances between patch test results for glove chemicals and glove swatches and between available information on chemicals used during glove production and chemicals detected during glove analysis. Although these factors may complicate the search for culprit and alternative gloves, dermatitis cleared in each of 9 patients with follow-up data and for whom alternative gloves were provided based on published information of glove composition. Conclusions: Allergic contact dermatitis due to synthetic rubber gloves occurs even with the use of latex-safe products. More knowledge about chemicals present in these gloves, to which the skin is exposed during use, is necessary to prevent and treat allergic contact dermatitis.",
author = "Cao, {Lauren Y.} and Taylor, {James S.} and Apra Sood and Debora Murray and Siegel, {Paul D.}",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/archdermatol.2010.219",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "146",
pages = "1001--1007",
journal = "JAMA Dermatology",
issn = "2168-6068",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Allergic contact dermatitis to synthetic rubber gloves

T2 - Changing trends in patch test reactions to accelerators

AU - Cao, Lauren Y.

AU - Taylor, James S.

AU - Sood, Apra

AU - Murray, Debora

AU - Siegel, Paul D.

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Background: Rubber gloves are one of the most frequent causes of occupational allergic contact dermatitis, especially in health care workers. Observations: We describe 23 patients with allergic contact dermatitis due to rubber accelerators in rubber gloves, some with disseminated dermatitis, treated during a 2-year period. Three had IgE-mediated latex allergies. Sixteen were health care workers from a single institution whose dermatitis was temporally related to the switch to latex-safe gloves. Each had positive patch test reactions to 1 or more rubber accelerators, including carbamates, thiurams, 2-mercaptobenzothiazole, and 1,3-diphenylguanidine. Chemical analysis of 6 glove samples identified 2-mercaptobenzothiazole in 4 and zinc diethyldithiocarbamate in 1. There were discordances between patch test results for glove chemicals and glove swatches and between available information on chemicals used during glove production and chemicals detected during glove analysis. Although these factors may complicate the search for culprit and alternative gloves, dermatitis cleared in each of 9 patients with follow-up data and for whom alternative gloves were provided based on published information of glove composition. Conclusions: Allergic contact dermatitis due to synthetic rubber gloves occurs even with the use of latex-safe products. More knowledge about chemicals present in these gloves, to which the skin is exposed during use, is necessary to prevent and treat allergic contact dermatitis.

AB - Background: Rubber gloves are one of the most frequent causes of occupational allergic contact dermatitis, especially in health care workers. Observations: We describe 23 patients with allergic contact dermatitis due to rubber accelerators in rubber gloves, some with disseminated dermatitis, treated during a 2-year period. Three had IgE-mediated latex allergies. Sixteen were health care workers from a single institution whose dermatitis was temporally related to the switch to latex-safe gloves. Each had positive patch test reactions to 1 or more rubber accelerators, including carbamates, thiurams, 2-mercaptobenzothiazole, and 1,3-diphenylguanidine. Chemical analysis of 6 glove samples identified 2-mercaptobenzothiazole in 4 and zinc diethyldithiocarbamate in 1. There were discordances between patch test results for glove chemicals and glove swatches and between available information on chemicals used during glove production and chemicals detected during glove analysis. Although these factors may complicate the search for culprit and alternative gloves, dermatitis cleared in each of 9 patients with follow-up data and for whom alternative gloves were provided based on published information of glove composition. Conclusions: Allergic contact dermatitis due to synthetic rubber gloves occurs even with the use of latex-safe products. More knowledge about chemicals present in these gloves, to which the skin is exposed during use, is necessary to prevent and treat allergic contact dermatitis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957126887&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957126887&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archdermatol.2010.219

DO - 10.1001/archdermatol.2010.219

M3 - Article

C2 - 20855699

AN - SCOPUS:77957126887

VL - 146

SP - 1001

EP - 1007

JO - JAMA Dermatology

JF - JAMA Dermatology

SN - 2168-6068

IS - 9

ER -