Airborne spread of foot-and-mouth disease - Model intercomparison

John Gloster, Andrew Jones, Alison Redington, Laura Burgin, Jens H. Sørensen, Richard Turner, Michael Dillon, Pam Hullinger, Matthew Simpson, Poul Astrup, Graeme Garner, Paul Stewart, Réal D'Amours, Robert Sellers, David Paton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) spreads by direct contact between animals, by animal products (milk, meat and semen), by mechanical transfer on people or fomites and by the airborne route, with the relative importance of each mechanism depending on the particular outbreak characteristics. Atmospheric dispersion models have been developed to assess airborne spread of FMDV in a number of countries, including the UK, Denmark, Australia, New Zealand, USA and Canada. These models were compared at a Workshop hosted by the Institute for Animal Health/Met Office in 2008. Each modeller was provided with data relating to the 1967 outbreak of FMD in Hampshire, UK, and asked to predict the spread of FMDV by the airborne route. A number of key issues emerged from the Workshop and subsequent modelling work: (1) in general all models predicted similar directions for livestock at risk, with much of the remaining differences strongly related to differences in the meteorological data used; (2) determination of an accurate sequence of events on the infected premises is highly important, especially if the meteorological conditions vary substantially during the virus emission period; (3) differences in assumptions made about virus release, environmental fate and susceptibility to airborne infection can substantially modify the size and location of the downwind risk area. All of the atmospheric dispersion models compared at the Workshop can be used to assess windborne spread of FMDV and provide scientific advice to those responsible for making control and eradication decisions in the event of an outbreak of disease. Crown

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)278-286
Number of pages9
JournalVeterinary Journal
Volume183
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Foot-and-Mouth Disease
Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus
disease models
foot-and-mouth disease
Foot-and-mouth disease virus
Disease Outbreaks
Education
Fomites
Virus Release
Meat Products
animal byproducts
fomites
environmental fate
Livestock
Denmark
Semen
Crowns
viruses
New Zealand
Canada

Keywords

  • Airborne disease transmission
  • Foot-and-mouth disease
  • Modelling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Gloster, J., Jones, A., Redington, A., Burgin, L., Sørensen, J. H., Turner, R., ... Paton, D. (2010). Airborne spread of foot-and-mouth disease - Model intercomparison. Veterinary Journal, 183(3), 278-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.11.011

Airborne spread of foot-and-mouth disease - Model intercomparison. / Gloster, John; Jones, Andrew; Redington, Alison; Burgin, Laura; Sørensen, Jens H.; Turner, Richard; Dillon, Michael; Hullinger, Pam; Simpson, Matthew; Astrup, Poul; Garner, Graeme; Stewart, Paul; D'Amours, Réal; Sellers, Robert; Paton, David.

In: Veterinary Journal, Vol. 183, No. 3, 01.03.2010, p. 278-286.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gloster, J, Jones, A, Redington, A, Burgin, L, Sørensen, JH, Turner, R, Dillon, M, Hullinger, P, Simpson, M, Astrup, P, Garner, G, Stewart, P, D'Amours, R, Sellers, R & Paton, D 2010, 'Airborne spread of foot-and-mouth disease - Model intercomparison', Veterinary Journal, vol. 183, no. 3, pp. 278-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.11.011
Gloster J, Jones A, Redington A, Burgin L, Sørensen JH, Turner R et al. Airborne spread of foot-and-mouth disease - Model intercomparison. Veterinary Journal. 2010 Mar 1;183(3):278-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.11.011
Gloster, John ; Jones, Andrew ; Redington, Alison ; Burgin, Laura ; Sørensen, Jens H. ; Turner, Richard ; Dillon, Michael ; Hullinger, Pam ; Simpson, Matthew ; Astrup, Poul ; Garner, Graeme ; Stewart, Paul ; D'Amours, Réal ; Sellers, Robert ; Paton, David. / Airborne spread of foot-and-mouth disease - Model intercomparison. In: Veterinary Journal. 2010 ; Vol. 183, No. 3. pp. 278-286.
@article{fb83163d2f93416aa208228fffc9abd6,
title = "Airborne spread of foot-and-mouth disease - Model intercomparison",
abstract = "Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) spreads by direct contact between animals, by animal products (milk, meat and semen), by mechanical transfer on people or fomites and by the airborne route, with the relative importance of each mechanism depending on the particular outbreak characteristics. Atmospheric dispersion models have been developed to assess airborne spread of FMDV in a number of countries, including the UK, Denmark, Australia, New Zealand, USA and Canada. These models were compared at a Workshop hosted by the Institute for Animal Health/Met Office in 2008. Each modeller was provided with data relating to the 1967 outbreak of FMD in Hampshire, UK, and asked to predict the spread of FMDV by the airborne route. A number of key issues emerged from the Workshop and subsequent modelling work: (1) in general all models predicted similar directions for livestock at risk, with much of the remaining differences strongly related to differences in the meteorological data used; (2) determination of an accurate sequence of events on the infected premises is highly important, especially if the meteorological conditions vary substantially during the virus emission period; (3) differences in assumptions made about virus release, environmental fate and susceptibility to airborne infection can substantially modify the size and location of the downwind risk area. All of the atmospheric dispersion models compared at the Workshop can be used to assess windborne spread of FMDV and provide scientific advice to those responsible for making control and eradication decisions in the event of an outbreak of disease. Crown",
keywords = "Airborne disease transmission, Foot-and-mouth disease, Modelling",
author = "John Gloster and Andrew Jones and Alison Redington and Laura Burgin and S{\o}rensen, {Jens H.} and Richard Turner and Michael Dillon and Pam Hullinger and Matthew Simpson and Poul Astrup and Graeme Garner and Paul Stewart and R{\'e}al D'Amours and Robert Sellers and David Paton",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.11.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "183",
pages = "278--286",
journal = "Veterinary Journal",
issn = "1090-0233",
publisher = "Bailliere Tindall Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Airborne spread of foot-and-mouth disease - Model intercomparison

AU - Gloster, John

AU - Jones, Andrew

AU - Redington, Alison

AU - Burgin, Laura

AU - Sørensen, Jens H.

AU - Turner, Richard

AU - Dillon, Michael

AU - Hullinger, Pam

AU - Simpson, Matthew

AU - Astrup, Poul

AU - Garner, Graeme

AU - Stewart, Paul

AU - D'Amours, Réal

AU - Sellers, Robert

AU - Paton, David

PY - 2010/3/1

Y1 - 2010/3/1

N2 - Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) spreads by direct contact between animals, by animal products (milk, meat and semen), by mechanical transfer on people or fomites and by the airborne route, with the relative importance of each mechanism depending on the particular outbreak characteristics. Atmospheric dispersion models have been developed to assess airborne spread of FMDV in a number of countries, including the UK, Denmark, Australia, New Zealand, USA and Canada. These models were compared at a Workshop hosted by the Institute for Animal Health/Met Office in 2008. Each modeller was provided with data relating to the 1967 outbreak of FMD in Hampshire, UK, and asked to predict the spread of FMDV by the airborne route. A number of key issues emerged from the Workshop and subsequent modelling work: (1) in general all models predicted similar directions for livestock at risk, with much of the remaining differences strongly related to differences in the meteorological data used; (2) determination of an accurate sequence of events on the infected premises is highly important, especially if the meteorological conditions vary substantially during the virus emission period; (3) differences in assumptions made about virus release, environmental fate and susceptibility to airborne infection can substantially modify the size and location of the downwind risk area. All of the atmospheric dispersion models compared at the Workshop can be used to assess windborne spread of FMDV and provide scientific advice to those responsible for making control and eradication decisions in the event of an outbreak of disease. Crown

AB - Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) spreads by direct contact between animals, by animal products (milk, meat and semen), by mechanical transfer on people or fomites and by the airborne route, with the relative importance of each mechanism depending on the particular outbreak characteristics. Atmospheric dispersion models have been developed to assess airborne spread of FMDV in a number of countries, including the UK, Denmark, Australia, New Zealand, USA and Canada. These models were compared at a Workshop hosted by the Institute for Animal Health/Met Office in 2008. Each modeller was provided with data relating to the 1967 outbreak of FMD in Hampshire, UK, and asked to predict the spread of FMDV by the airborne route. A number of key issues emerged from the Workshop and subsequent modelling work: (1) in general all models predicted similar directions for livestock at risk, with much of the remaining differences strongly related to differences in the meteorological data used; (2) determination of an accurate sequence of events on the infected premises is highly important, especially if the meteorological conditions vary substantially during the virus emission period; (3) differences in assumptions made about virus release, environmental fate and susceptibility to airborne infection can substantially modify the size and location of the downwind risk area. All of the atmospheric dispersion models compared at the Workshop can be used to assess windborne spread of FMDV and provide scientific advice to those responsible for making control and eradication decisions in the event of an outbreak of disease. Crown

KW - Airborne disease transmission

KW - Foot-and-mouth disease

KW - Modelling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=76049097832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=76049097832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.11.011

DO - 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.11.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 19138867

AN - SCOPUS:76049097832

VL - 183

SP - 278

EP - 286

JO - Veterinary Journal

JF - Veterinary Journal

SN - 1090-0233

IS - 3

ER -