Agreement Between HEDIS Performance Assessments in the VA and Medicare Advantage

Is Quality in the Eye of the Beholder?

Amal N. Trivedi, Ira B. Wilson, Mary E. Charlton, Kenneth W Kizer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Medicare Advantage (MA) plans and the Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system assess quality of care using standardized Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) performance measures. Little is known, however, about the relative accuracy of quality indicators for persons receiving care in more than one health care system. Among Veterans dually enrolled in an MA plan, we examined the agreement between MA and VA HEDIS assessments. Our study tested the hypothesis that private health plans underreport quality of care relative to a fully integrated delivery system utilizing a comprehensive electronic health record. Despite assessing the same individuals using identical measure specifications, reported VA performance was significantly better than reported MA performance for all 12 HEDIS measures. The VA's performance advantage ranged from 9.8% (glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c] < 7.0% in diabetes) to 54.7% (blood pressure < 140/90 mm Hg in diabetes). The overall agreement between VA and MA HEDIS assessments ranged from 38.5% to 62.6%. Performance rates derived from VA and MA aggregate data were 1.6% to 14.3% higher than those reported by VA alone. This analysis suggests that neither MA plans nor the VA fully capture quality of care information for dually enrolled persons. However, the VA's system-wide electronic health record may allow for more complete capture of quality information across multiple providers and settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInquiry
Volume53
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Medicare Part C
Veterans
Delivery of Health Care
Quality of Health Care
Electronic Health Records
Integrated Delivery of Health Care
Veterans Health
Glycosylated Hemoglobin A
Datasets
Blood Pressure

Keywords

  • dual use
  • managed care
  • Medicare
  • quality of care
  • veterans

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Agreement Between HEDIS Performance Assessments in the VA and Medicare Advantage : Is Quality in the Eye of the Beholder? / Trivedi, Amal N.; Wilson, Ira B.; Charlton, Mary E.; Kizer, Kenneth W.

In: Inquiry, Vol. 53, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7b0e7ad1b1624ca38e1f4edaea520e59,
title = "Agreement Between HEDIS Performance Assessments in the VA and Medicare Advantage: Is Quality in the Eye of the Beholder?",
abstract = "Medicare Advantage (MA) plans and the Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system assess quality of care using standardized Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) performance measures. Little is known, however, about the relative accuracy of quality indicators for persons receiving care in more than one health care system. Among Veterans dually enrolled in an MA plan, we examined the agreement between MA and VA HEDIS assessments. Our study tested the hypothesis that private health plans underreport quality of care relative to a fully integrated delivery system utilizing a comprehensive electronic health record. Despite assessing the same individuals using identical measure specifications, reported VA performance was significantly better than reported MA performance for all 12 HEDIS measures. The VA's performance advantage ranged from 9.8{\%} (glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c] < 7.0{\%} in diabetes) to 54.7{\%} (blood pressure < 140/90 mm Hg in diabetes). The overall agreement between VA and MA HEDIS assessments ranged from 38.5{\%} to 62.6{\%}. Performance rates derived from VA and MA aggregate data were 1.6{\%} to 14.3{\%} higher than those reported by VA alone. This analysis suggests that neither MA plans nor the VA fully capture quality of care information for dually enrolled persons. However, the VA's system-wide electronic health record may allow for more complete capture of quality information across multiple providers and settings.",
keywords = "dual use, managed care, Medicare, quality of care, veterans",
author = "Trivedi, {Amal N.} and Wilson, {Ira B.} and Charlton, {Mary E.} and Kizer, {Kenneth W}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1177/0046958016638804",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
journal = "Inquiry",
issn = "0046-9580",
publisher = "Excellus Health Plan",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Agreement Between HEDIS Performance Assessments in the VA and Medicare Advantage

T2 - Is Quality in the Eye of the Beholder?

AU - Trivedi, Amal N.

AU - Wilson, Ira B.

AU - Charlton, Mary E.

AU - Kizer, Kenneth W

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Medicare Advantage (MA) plans and the Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system assess quality of care using standardized Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) performance measures. Little is known, however, about the relative accuracy of quality indicators for persons receiving care in more than one health care system. Among Veterans dually enrolled in an MA plan, we examined the agreement between MA and VA HEDIS assessments. Our study tested the hypothesis that private health plans underreport quality of care relative to a fully integrated delivery system utilizing a comprehensive electronic health record. Despite assessing the same individuals using identical measure specifications, reported VA performance was significantly better than reported MA performance for all 12 HEDIS measures. The VA's performance advantage ranged from 9.8% (glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c] < 7.0% in diabetes) to 54.7% (blood pressure < 140/90 mm Hg in diabetes). The overall agreement between VA and MA HEDIS assessments ranged from 38.5% to 62.6%. Performance rates derived from VA and MA aggregate data were 1.6% to 14.3% higher than those reported by VA alone. This analysis suggests that neither MA plans nor the VA fully capture quality of care information for dually enrolled persons. However, the VA's system-wide electronic health record may allow for more complete capture of quality information across multiple providers and settings.

AB - Medicare Advantage (MA) plans and the Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system assess quality of care using standardized Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) performance measures. Little is known, however, about the relative accuracy of quality indicators for persons receiving care in more than one health care system. Among Veterans dually enrolled in an MA plan, we examined the agreement between MA and VA HEDIS assessments. Our study tested the hypothesis that private health plans underreport quality of care relative to a fully integrated delivery system utilizing a comprehensive electronic health record. Despite assessing the same individuals using identical measure specifications, reported VA performance was significantly better than reported MA performance for all 12 HEDIS measures. The VA's performance advantage ranged from 9.8% (glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c] < 7.0% in diabetes) to 54.7% (blood pressure < 140/90 mm Hg in diabetes). The overall agreement between VA and MA HEDIS assessments ranged from 38.5% to 62.6%. Performance rates derived from VA and MA aggregate data were 1.6% to 14.3% higher than those reported by VA alone. This analysis suggests that neither MA plans nor the VA fully capture quality of care information for dually enrolled persons. However, the VA's system-wide electronic health record may allow for more complete capture of quality information across multiple providers and settings.

KW - dual use

KW - managed care

KW - Medicare

KW - quality of care

KW - veterans

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979798619&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84979798619&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0046958016638804

DO - 10.1177/0046958016638804

M3 - Article

VL - 53

JO - Inquiry

JF - Inquiry

SN - 0046-9580

ER -