Agreement Among 4 Sampling Methods to Identify Respiratory Pathogens in Dairy Calves with Acute Bovine Respiratory Disease

D. Doyle, B. Credille, Terry W Lehenbauer, R. Berghaus, Sharif S Aly, J. Champagne, Patricia C Blanchard, Beate Crossley, L. Berghaus, S. Cochran, A. Woolums

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Four sampling techniques commonly are used for antemortem identification of pathogens from cattle with bovine respiratory disease (BRD): the nasal swab (NS), guarded nasopharyngeal swab (NPS), bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), and transtracheal wash (TTW). Agreement among these methods has not been well characterized. Objective: To evaluate agreement among TTW and NS, NPS, or BAL for identification of viral and bacterial pathogens in dairy calves with BRD. Animals: One hundred dairy calves with naturally acquired BRD. Methods: Calves were sampled by all 4 methods. Viral agents were identified by real-time RT-PCR, bacteria were identified by aerobic culture, and Mycoplasma bovis (M. bovis) isolates were speciated by PCR. Agreement among TTW and NS, NPS, or BAL was evaluated by calculating the kappa statistic and percent positive agreement. McNemar's exact test was used to compare the proportions of positive results. Results: Agreement among TTW and NS, TTW and NPS, and TTW and BAL, was very good for identification of P. multocida, M. haemolytica, and M. bovis. For bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV), agreement with TTW was moderate for NS, good for NPS, and very good for BAL. For bovine coronavirus (BCV), agreement with TTW was moderate for NS and NPS, and good for BAL. McNemar's test was significant only for BCV, indicating that for this pathogen the proportion of positive results from NS and NPS could not be considered comparable to TTW. Conclusions and Clinical Importance: This study provides guidance for veterinarians selecting diagnostic tests for antemortem identification of pathogens associated with BRD.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2017

Fingerprint

Cattle Diseases
bovine respiratory disease
dairy calves
Nose
Bronchoalveolar Lavage
pathogens
Bovine Coronavirus
Mycoplasma bovis
Bovine coronavirus
pathogen identification
sampling
methodology
Bovine respiratory syncytial virus
Veterinarians
Routine Diagnostic Tests
diagnostic techniques
veterinarians
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
statistics
reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction

Keywords

  • Bacteria
  • Diagnosis
  • Pneumonia
  • Virus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Agreement Among 4 Sampling Methods to Identify Respiratory Pathogens in Dairy Calves with Acute Bovine Respiratory Disease. / Doyle, D.; Credille, B.; Lehenbauer, Terry W; Berghaus, R.; Aly, Sharif S; Champagne, J.; Blanchard, Patricia C; Crossley, Beate; Berghaus, L.; Cochran, S.; Woolums, A.

In: Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8209a483ea1c46fca0f8cdc280d1226d,
title = "Agreement Among 4 Sampling Methods to Identify Respiratory Pathogens in Dairy Calves with Acute Bovine Respiratory Disease",
abstract = "Background: Four sampling techniques commonly are used for antemortem identification of pathogens from cattle with bovine respiratory disease (BRD): the nasal swab (NS), guarded nasopharyngeal swab (NPS), bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), and transtracheal wash (TTW). Agreement among these methods has not been well characterized. Objective: To evaluate agreement among TTW and NS, NPS, or BAL for identification of viral and bacterial pathogens in dairy calves with BRD. Animals: One hundred dairy calves with naturally acquired BRD. Methods: Calves were sampled by all 4 methods. Viral agents were identified by real-time RT-PCR, bacteria were identified by aerobic culture, and Mycoplasma bovis (M. bovis) isolates were speciated by PCR. Agreement among TTW and NS, NPS, or BAL was evaluated by calculating the kappa statistic and percent positive agreement. McNemar's exact test was used to compare the proportions of positive results. Results: Agreement among TTW and NS, TTW and NPS, and TTW and BAL, was very good for identification of P. multocida, M. haemolytica, and M. bovis. For bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV), agreement with TTW was moderate for NS, good for NPS, and very good for BAL. For bovine coronavirus (BCV), agreement with TTW was moderate for NS and NPS, and good for BAL. McNemar's test was significant only for BCV, indicating that for this pathogen the proportion of positive results from NS and NPS could not be considered comparable to TTW. Conclusions and Clinical Importance: This study provides guidance for veterinarians selecting diagnostic tests for antemortem identification of pathogens associated with BRD.",
keywords = "Bacteria, Diagnosis, Pneumonia, Virus",
author = "D. Doyle and B. Credille and Lehenbauer, {Terry W} and R. Berghaus and Aly, {Sharif S} and J. Champagne and Blanchard, {Patricia C} and Beate Crossley and L. Berghaus and S. Cochran and A. Woolums",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1111/jvim.14683",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine",
issn = "0891-6640",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Agreement Among 4 Sampling Methods to Identify Respiratory Pathogens in Dairy Calves with Acute Bovine Respiratory Disease

AU - Doyle, D.

AU - Credille, B.

AU - Lehenbauer, Terry W

AU - Berghaus, R.

AU - Aly, Sharif S

AU - Champagne, J.

AU - Blanchard, Patricia C

AU - Crossley, Beate

AU - Berghaus, L.

AU - Cochran, S.

AU - Woolums, A.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Background: Four sampling techniques commonly are used for antemortem identification of pathogens from cattle with bovine respiratory disease (BRD): the nasal swab (NS), guarded nasopharyngeal swab (NPS), bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), and transtracheal wash (TTW). Agreement among these methods has not been well characterized. Objective: To evaluate agreement among TTW and NS, NPS, or BAL for identification of viral and bacterial pathogens in dairy calves with BRD. Animals: One hundred dairy calves with naturally acquired BRD. Methods: Calves were sampled by all 4 methods. Viral agents were identified by real-time RT-PCR, bacteria were identified by aerobic culture, and Mycoplasma bovis (M. bovis) isolates were speciated by PCR. Agreement among TTW and NS, NPS, or BAL was evaluated by calculating the kappa statistic and percent positive agreement. McNemar's exact test was used to compare the proportions of positive results. Results: Agreement among TTW and NS, TTW and NPS, and TTW and BAL, was very good for identification of P. multocida, M. haemolytica, and M. bovis. For bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV), agreement with TTW was moderate for NS, good for NPS, and very good for BAL. For bovine coronavirus (BCV), agreement with TTW was moderate for NS and NPS, and good for BAL. McNemar's test was significant only for BCV, indicating that for this pathogen the proportion of positive results from NS and NPS could not be considered comparable to TTW. Conclusions and Clinical Importance: This study provides guidance for veterinarians selecting diagnostic tests for antemortem identification of pathogens associated with BRD.

AB - Background: Four sampling techniques commonly are used for antemortem identification of pathogens from cattle with bovine respiratory disease (BRD): the nasal swab (NS), guarded nasopharyngeal swab (NPS), bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), and transtracheal wash (TTW). Agreement among these methods has not been well characterized. Objective: To evaluate agreement among TTW and NS, NPS, or BAL for identification of viral and bacterial pathogens in dairy calves with BRD. Animals: One hundred dairy calves with naturally acquired BRD. Methods: Calves were sampled by all 4 methods. Viral agents were identified by real-time RT-PCR, bacteria were identified by aerobic culture, and Mycoplasma bovis (M. bovis) isolates were speciated by PCR. Agreement among TTW and NS, NPS, or BAL was evaluated by calculating the kappa statistic and percent positive agreement. McNemar's exact test was used to compare the proportions of positive results. Results: Agreement among TTW and NS, TTW and NPS, and TTW and BAL, was very good for identification of P. multocida, M. haemolytica, and M. bovis. For bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV), agreement with TTW was moderate for NS, good for NPS, and very good for BAL. For bovine coronavirus (BCV), agreement with TTW was moderate for NS and NPS, and good for BAL. McNemar's test was significant only for BCV, indicating that for this pathogen the proportion of positive results from NS and NPS could not be considered comparable to TTW. Conclusions and Clinical Importance: This study provides guidance for veterinarians selecting diagnostic tests for antemortem identification of pathogens associated with BRD.

KW - Bacteria

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Pneumonia

KW - Virus

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015321327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015321327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jvim.14683

DO - 10.1111/jvim.14683

M3 - Article

C2 - 28295570

AN - SCOPUS:85015321327

JO - Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine

SN - 0891-6640

ER -