Adverse reproductive outcomes among female veterinarians

Marc B Schenker, Steven J. Samuels, Rochelle S. Green, Patricia Wiggins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Because female veterinarians are exposed to several known reproductive hazards, the authors conducted a reproductive survey of all female graduates of a US veterinary school (n=537) and law school (comparison group, n=794). Analysis was confined to pregnancies completed after the second year of professional school and from 1966 to 1986. Based on one randomly chosen eligible pregnancy per woman (veterinarians, n=176; lawyers, n=229), spontaneous abortion rates, adjusted for elective abortions, were 13.3% for the veterinarians and 15.1% for the lawyers; these did not differ significantly. A Cox life table regression model controlling for age, smoking, alcohol use, and prior spontaneous abortion also showed no significant difference in spontaneous abortion rates between the two populations. Using all pregnancies, veterinarians who reported performing five or more radiographic examinations per week had a marginally elevated risk of spontaneous abortion, but the statistical significance disappeared when analysis was limited to one random pregnancy per woman. For one random eligible birth per woman, the mean birth weight did not differ significantly between the veterinarians and lawyers, even after controlling for possible confounders in regression analyses. A higher rate of reportable birth defects was observed among the veterinarians than among the lawyers (relative risk=4.2, 95% confidence interval 1.2-15.1), but this unexpected result must be considered hypothesis-generating. The authors did not find an overall increased risk for spontaneous abortion or low birth weight infants among veterinarians compared with lawyers, but veterinarians who reported performing five or more radiographic examinations per week may have been at increased risk for spontaneous abortion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)96-106
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Journal of Epidemiology
Volume132
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jul 1990

Fingerprint

Veterinarians
Spontaneous Abortion
Lawyers
Pregnancy
Induced Abortion
Veterinary Schools
Life Tables
Low Birth Weight Infant
Birth Weight
Smoking
Regression Analysis
Alcohols
Parturition
Confidence Intervals

Keywords

  • Abnormalities
  • Abortion
  • Abortion, induced
  • Anesthetics
  • Infant, low birth weight
  • Radiation
  • Veterinary medicine
  • Women, working

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Schenker, M. B., Samuels, S. J., Green, R. S., & Wiggins, P. (1990). Adverse reproductive outcomes among female veterinarians. American Journal of Epidemiology, 132(1), 96-106.

Adverse reproductive outcomes among female veterinarians. / Schenker, Marc B; Samuels, Steven J.; Green, Rochelle S.; Wiggins, Patricia.

In: American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 132, No. 1, 07.1990, p. 96-106.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schenker, MB, Samuels, SJ, Green, RS & Wiggins, P 1990, 'Adverse reproductive outcomes among female veterinarians', American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 132, no. 1, pp. 96-106.
Schenker, Marc B ; Samuels, Steven J. ; Green, Rochelle S. ; Wiggins, Patricia. / Adverse reproductive outcomes among female veterinarians. In: American Journal of Epidemiology. 1990 ; Vol. 132, No. 1. pp. 96-106.
@article{ba28604ba4ec479dbd3b9f0b88e73664,
title = "Adverse reproductive outcomes among female veterinarians",
abstract = "Because female veterinarians are exposed to several known reproductive hazards, the authors conducted a reproductive survey of all female graduates of a US veterinary school (n=537) and law school (comparison group, n=794). Analysis was confined to pregnancies completed after the second year of professional school and from 1966 to 1986. Based on one randomly chosen eligible pregnancy per woman (veterinarians, n=176; lawyers, n=229), spontaneous abortion rates, adjusted for elective abortions, were 13.3{\%} for the veterinarians and 15.1{\%} for the lawyers; these did not differ significantly. A Cox life table regression model controlling for age, smoking, alcohol use, and prior spontaneous abortion also showed no significant difference in spontaneous abortion rates between the two populations. Using all pregnancies, veterinarians who reported performing five or more radiographic examinations per week had a marginally elevated risk of spontaneous abortion, but the statistical significance disappeared when analysis was limited to one random pregnancy per woman. For one random eligible birth per woman, the mean birth weight did not differ significantly between the veterinarians and lawyers, even after controlling for possible confounders in regression analyses. A higher rate of reportable birth defects was observed among the veterinarians than among the lawyers (relative risk=4.2, 95{\%} confidence interval 1.2-15.1), but this unexpected result must be considered hypothesis-generating. The authors did not find an overall increased risk for spontaneous abortion or low birth weight infants among veterinarians compared with lawyers, but veterinarians who reported performing five or more radiographic examinations per week may have been at increased risk for spontaneous abortion.",
keywords = "Abnormalities, Abortion, Abortion, induced, Anesthetics, Infant, low birth weight, Radiation, Veterinary medicine, Women, working",
author = "Schenker, {Marc B} and Samuels, {Steven J.} and Green, {Rochelle S.} and Patricia Wiggins",
year = "1990",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "132",
pages = "96--106",
journal = "American Journal of Epidemiology",
issn = "0002-9262",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adverse reproductive outcomes among female veterinarians

AU - Schenker, Marc B

AU - Samuels, Steven J.

AU - Green, Rochelle S.

AU - Wiggins, Patricia

PY - 1990/7

Y1 - 1990/7

N2 - Because female veterinarians are exposed to several known reproductive hazards, the authors conducted a reproductive survey of all female graduates of a US veterinary school (n=537) and law school (comparison group, n=794). Analysis was confined to pregnancies completed after the second year of professional school and from 1966 to 1986. Based on one randomly chosen eligible pregnancy per woman (veterinarians, n=176; lawyers, n=229), spontaneous abortion rates, adjusted for elective abortions, were 13.3% for the veterinarians and 15.1% for the lawyers; these did not differ significantly. A Cox life table regression model controlling for age, smoking, alcohol use, and prior spontaneous abortion also showed no significant difference in spontaneous abortion rates between the two populations. Using all pregnancies, veterinarians who reported performing five or more radiographic examinations per week had a marginally elevated risk of spontaneous abortion, but the statistical significance disappeared when analysis was limited to one random pregnancy per woman. For one random eligible birth per woman, the mean birth weight did not differ significantly between the veterinarians and lawyers, even after controlling for possible confounders in regression analyses. A higher rate of reportable birth defects was observed among the veterinarians than among the lawyers (relative risk=4.2, 95% confidence interval 1.2-15.1), but this unexpected result must be considered hypothesis-generating. The authors did not find an overall increased risk for spontaneous abortion or low birth weight infants among veterinarians compared with lawyers, but veterinarians who reported performing five or more radiographic examinations per week may have been at increased risk for spontaneous abortion.

AB - Because female veterinarians are exposed to several known reproductive hazards, the authors conducted a reproductive survey of all female graduates of a US veterinary school (n=537) and law school (comparison group, n=794). Analysis was confined to pregnancies completed after the second year of professional school and from 1966 to 1986. Based on one randomly chosen eligible pregnancy per woman (veterinarians, n=176; lawyers, n=229), spontaneous abortion rates, adjusted for elective abortions, were 13.3% for the veterinarians and 15.1% for the lawyers; these did not differ significantly. A Cox life table regression model controlling for age, smoking, alcohol use, and prior spontaneous abortion also showed no significant difference in spontaneous abortion rates between the two populations. Using all pregnancies, veterinarians who reported performing five or more radiographic examinations per week had a marginally elevated risk of spontaneous abortion, but the statistical significance disappeared when analysis was limited to one random pregnancy per woman. For one random eligible birth per woman, the mean birth weight did not differ significantly between the veterinarians and lawyers, even after controlling for possible confounders in regression analyses. A higher rate of reportable birth defects was observed among the veterinarians than among the lawyers (relative risk=4.2, 95% confidence interval 1.2-15.1), but this unexpected result must be considered hypothesis-generating. The authors did not find an overall increased risk for spontaneous abortion or low birth weight infants among veterinarians compared with lawyers, but veterinarians who reported performing five or more radiographic examinations per week may have been at increased risk for spontaneous abortion.

KW - Abnormalities

KW - Abortion

KW - Abortion, induced

KW - Anesthetics

KW - Infant, low birth weight

KW - Radiation

KW - Veterinary medicine

KW - Women, working

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025341707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025341707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2356819

AN - SCOPUS:0025341707

VL - 132

SP - 96

EP - 106

JO - American Journal of Epidemiology

JF - American Journal of Epidemiology

SN - 0002-9262

IS - 1

ER -