Adaptive styles in elite collegiate athletes: The role of activation and self-regulation

Hans Steiner, Katherine Denny, Pascale Stemmle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present study examined the interaction of emotional activation and self-regulation in elite collegiate athletes. We hypothesized that athletes would report higher levels of self-restraint, repressive defensiveness and denial of distress, but lower levels of distress than non-athletes. Participants were composed of 461 collegiate athletes and 61 age- and gender-matched non-athletes from Stanford University. Social-emotional adjustment and personality were assessed with the Weinberger Adjustment Inventory. Results indicate significant differences between athletes and non-athletes. Athletes report lower levels of distress, higher levels of self-restraint, repressive defensiveness and denial of distress. Logistic regressions assessed the important predictors of athlete status. Age, denial of distress and responsibility proved to be the most significant indicators of athlete status. Data can be interpreted in at least two ways: (1) athletes are better at dealing with pressure and therefore report lower levels of distress; or (2) athletes report lower distress because they utilize high levels of repressive defensiveness and denial of distress. Utilizing non self-report methods would further clarify this question and would provide a deeper understanding of personality traits in athletes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)163-171
Number of pages9
JournalPersonality and Mental Health
Volume4
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Athletes
Social Adjustment
Personality
Self-Control
Self Report
Logistic Models
Pressure
Equipment and Supplies
Denial (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Phychiatric Mental Health
  • Health Policy
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Adaptive styles in elite collegiate athletes : The role of activation and self-regulation. / Steiner, Hans; Denny, Katherine; Stemmle, Pascale.

In: Personality and Mental Health, Vol. 4, No. 3, 01.08.2010, p. 163-171.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d3d8a15089b9458da3b6130c4fbc425a,
title = "Adaptive styles in elite collegiate athletes: The role of activation and self-regulation",
abstract = "The present study examined the interaction of emotional activation and self-regulation in elite collegiate athletes. We hypothesized that athletes would report higher levels of self-restraint, repressive defensiveness and denial of distress, but lower levels of distress than non-athletes. Participants were composed of 461 collegiate athletes and 61 age- and gender-matched non-athletes from Stanford University. Social-emotional adjustment and personality were assessed with the Weinberger Adjustment Inventory. Results indicate significant differences between athletes and non-athletes. Athletes report lower levels of distress, higher levels of self-restraint, repressive defensiveness and denial of distress. Logistic regressions assessed the important predictors of athlete status. Age, denial of distress and responsibility proved to be the most significant indicators of athlete status. Data can be interpreted in at least two ways: (1) athletes are better at dealing with pressure and therefore report lower levels of distress; or (2) athletes report lower distress because they utilize high levels of repressive defensiveness and denial of distress. Utilizing non self-report methods would further clarify this question and would provide a deeper understanding of personality traits in athletes.",
author = "Hans Steiner and Katherine Denny and Pascale Stemmle",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/pmh.120",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "163--171",
journal = "Personality and Mental Health",
issn = "1932-8621",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adaptive styles in elite collegiate athletes

T2 - The role of activation and self-regulation

AU - Steiner, Hans

AU - Denny, Katherine

AU - Stemmle, Pascale

PY - 2010/8/1

Y1 - 2010/8/1

N2 - The present study examined the interaction of emotional activation and self-regulation in elite collegiate athletes. We hypothesized that athletes would report higher levels of self-restraint, repressive defensiveness and denial of distress, but lower levels of distress than non-athletes. Participants were composed of 461 collegiate athletes and 61 age- and gender-matched non-athletes from Stanford University. Social-emotional adjustment and personality were assessed with the Weinberger Adjustment Inventory. Results indicate significant differences between athletes and non-athletes. Athletes report lower levels of distress, higher levels of self-restraint, repressive defensiveness and denial of distress. Logistic regressions assessed the important predictors of athlete status. Age, denial of distress and responsibility proved to be the most significant indicators of athlete status. Data can be interpreted in at least two ways: (1) athletes are better at dealing with pressure and therefore report lower levels of distress; or (2) athletes report lower distress because they utilize high levels of repressive defensiveness and denial of distress. Utilizing non self-report methods would further clarify this question and would provide a deeper understanding of personality traits in athletes.

AB - The present study examined the interaction of emotional activation and self-regulation in elite collegiate athletes. We hypothesized that athletes would report higher levels of self-restraint, repressive defensiveness and denial of distress, but lower levels of distress than non-athletes. Participants were composed of 461 collegiate athletes and 61 age- and gender-matched non-athletes from Stanford University. Social-emotional adjustment and personality were assessed with the Weinberger Adjustment Inventory. Results indicate significant differences between athletes and non-athletes. Athletes report lower levels of distress, higher levels of self-restraint, repressive defensiveness and denial of distress. Logistic regressions assessed the important predictors of athlete status. Age, denial of distress and responsibility proved to be the most significant indicators of athlete status. Data can be interpreted in at least two ways: (1) athletes are better at dealing with pressure and therefore report lower levels of distress; or (2) athletes report lower distress because they utilize high levels of repressive defensiveness and denial of distress. Utilizing non self-report methods would further clarify this question and would provide a deeper understanding of personality traits in athletes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78149475221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78149475221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/pmh.120

DO - 10.1002/pmh.120

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:78149475221

VL - 4

SP - 163

EP - 171

JO - Personality and Mental Health

JF - Personality and Mental Health

SN - 1932-8621

IS - 3

ER -