Acute inflammatory response to contrast agent aspiration and its mechanisms in the rat lung

Rumi Ueha, Nogah Nativ-Zeltzer, Taku Sato, Takao Goto, Takaharu Nito, Peter C Belafsky, Tatsuya Yamasoba

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis: Contrast agent (CA) aspiration is an established complication of upper gastrointestinal and videofluoroscopic swallow studies. The underlying molecular biological mechanisms of acute response to CA aspiration in the respiratory organs remain unclear. The aims of this study were to elucidate the histological and biological influences of three kinds of CAs on the lung and to clarify the differences in acute responses. Study Design: Animal model. Methods: Eight-week-old male Sprague Dawley rats were divided into five groups (n = 6 in each group). Three groups underwent tracheal instillation of one of three different CAs: barium (Ba) sulfate, nonionic contrast agents (NICAs), and ionic contrast agents (ICAs). A control group was instilled with saline and a sham group was instilled with air. All animals were euthanized on day 2 after treatment and histological and gene analysis was performed. Results: No animal died after CA or control/sham aspiration. Ba caused severe histopathologic changes and more prominent inflammatory cell infiltration in the lungs compared with the two other iodinated contrast agents. Increases in expressions of inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor [Tnf], interleukin-1β [Il1b], and interferon-γ [Ifng]) were observed in Ba aspiration rats, and upregulation of Il1b was seen in ICA aspiration rats. NICA did not cause obvious histologic changes or expressions of inflammatory cytokines and fibrosis-related genes in the lungs. Conclusions: Ba caused significantly more acute lung inflammation in a rodent model than did ioinic and nonionic iodinated CAs. Nonionic contrast did not cause any discernible inflammatory response in the lungs, suggesting that it may be the safest contrast for videofluoroscopic swallow studies. Level of Evidence: NA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalLaryngoscope
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Contrast Media
Lung
Barium
Deglutition
Respiratory Aspiration
Barium Sulfate
Cytokines
Interleukin-1
Interferons
Genes
Sprague Dawley Rats
Rodentia
Pneumonia
Fibrosis
Up-Regulation
Animal Models
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
Air
Control Groups

Keywords

  • acute response
  • Contrast agents
  • inflammatory cells
  • inflammatory cytokines
  • lung

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Acute inflammatory response to contrast agent aspiration and its mechanisms in the rat lung. / Ueha, Rumi; Nativ-Zeltzer, Nogah; Sato, Taku; Goto, Takao; Nito, Takaharu; Belafsky, Peter C; Yamasoba, Tatsuya.

In: Laryngoscope, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ueha, Rumi ; Nativ-Zeltzer, Nogah ; Sato, Taku ; Goto, Takao ; Nito, Takaharu ; Belafsky, Peter C ; Yamasoba, Tatsuya. / Acute inflammatory response to contrast agent aspiration and its mechanisms in the rat lung. In: Laryngoscope. 2018.
@article{f6ff52ce0bd144c8bda5ae71d8511c9e,
title = "Acute inflammatory response to contrast agent aspiration and its mechanisms in the rat lung",
abstract = "Objectives/Hypothesis: Contrast agent (CA) aspiration is an established complication of upper gastrointestinal and videofluoroscopic swallow studies. The underlying molecular biological mechanisms of acute response to CA aspiration in the respiratory organs remain unclear. The aims of this study were to elucidate the histological and biological influences of three kinds of CAs on the lung and to clarify the differences in acute responses. Study Design: Animal model. Methods: Eight-week-old male Sprague Dawley rats were divided into five groups (n = 6 in each group). Three groups underwent tracheal instillation of one of three different CAs: barium (Ba) sulfate, nonionic contrast agents (NICAs), and ionic contrast agents (ICAs). A control group was instilled with saline and a sham group was instilled with air. All animals were euthanized on day 2 after treatment and histological and gene analysis was performed. Results: No animal died after CA or control/sham aspiration. Ba caused severe histopathologic changes and more prominent inflammatory cell infiltration in the lungs compared with the two other iodinated contrast agents. Increases in expressions of inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor [Tnf], interleukin-1β [Il1b], and interferon-γ [Ifng]) were observed in Ba aspiration rats, and upregulation of Il1b was seen in ICA aspiration rats. NICA did not cause obvious histologic changes or expressions of inflammatory cytokines and fibrosis-related genes in the lungs. Conclusions: Ba caused significantly more acute lung inflammation in a rodent model than did ioinic and nonionic iodinated CAs. Nonionic contrast did not cause any discernible inflammatory response in the lungs, suggesting that it may be the safest contrast for videofluoroscopic swallow studies. Level of Evidence: NA.",
keywords = "acute response, Contrast agents, inflammatory cells, inflammatory cytokines, lung",
author = "Rumi Ueha and Nogah Nativ-Zeltzer and Taku Sato and Takao Goto and Takaharu Nito and Belafsky, {Peter C} and Tatsuya Yamasoba",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/lary.27663",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acute inflammatory response to contrast agent aspiration and its mechanisms in the rat lung

AU - Ueha, Rumi

AU - Nativ-Zeltzer, Nogah

AU - Sato, Taku

AU - Goto, Takao

AU - Nito, Takaharu

AU - Belafsky, Peter C

AU - Yamasoba, Tatsuya

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Objectives/Hypothesis: Contrast agent (CA) aspiration is an established complication of upper gastrointestinal and videofluoroscopic swallow studies. The underlying molecular biological mechanisms of acute response to CA aspiration in the respiratory organs remain unclear. The aims of this study were to elucidate the histological and biological influences of three kinds of CAs on the lung and to clarify the differences in acute responses. Study Design: Animal model. Methods: Eight-week-old male Sprague Dawley rats were divided into five groups (n = 6 in each group). Three groups underwent tracheal instillation of one of three different CAs: barium (Ba) sulfate, nonionic contrast agents (NICAs), and ionic contrast agents (ICAs). A control group was instilled with saline and a sham group was instilled with air. All animals were euthanized on day 2 after treatment and histological and gene analysis was performed. Results: No animal died after CA or control/sham aspiration. Ba caused severe histopathologic changes and more prominent inflammatory cell infiltration in the lungs compared with the two other iodinated contrast agents. Increases in expressions of inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor [Tnf], interleukin-1β [Il1b], and interferon-γ [Ifng]) were observed in Ba aspiration rats, and upregulation of Il1b was seen in ICA aspiration rats. NICA did not cause obvious histologic changes or expressions of inflammatory cytokines and fibrosis-related genes in the lungs. Conclusions: Ba caused significantly more acute lung inflammation in a rodent model than did ioinic and nonionic iodinated CAs. Nonionic contrast did not cause any discernible inflammatory response in the lungs, suggesting that it may be the safest contrast for videofluoroscopic swallow studies. Level of Evidence: NA.

AB - Objectives/Hypothesis: Contrast agent (CA) aspiration is an established complication of upper gastrointestinal and videofluoroscopic swallow studies. The underlying molecular biological mechanisms of acute response to CA aspiration in the respiratory organs remain unclear. The aims of this study were to elucidate the histological and biological influences of three kinds of CAs on the lung and to clarify the differences in acute responses. Study Design: Animal model. Methods: Eight-week-old male Sprague Dawley rats were divided into five groups (n = 6 in each group). Three groups underwent tracheal instillation of one of three different CAs: barium (Ba) sulfate, nonionic contrast agents (NICAs), and ionic contrast agents (ICAs). A control group was instilled with saline and a sham group was instilled with air. All animals were euthanized on day 2 after treatment and histological and gene analysis was performed. Results: No animal died after CA or control/sham aspiration. Ba caused severe histopathologic changes and more prominent inflammatory cell infiltration in the lungs compared with the two other iodinated contrast agents. Increases in expressions of inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor [Tnf], interleukin-1β [Il1b], and interferon-γ [Ifng]) were observed in Ba aspiration rats, and upregulation of Il1b was seen in ICA aspiration rats. NICA did not cause obvious histologic changes or expressions of inflammatory cytokines and fibrosis-related genes in the lungs. Conclusions: Ba caused significantly more acute lung inflammation in a rodent model than did ioinic and nonionic iodinated CAs. Nonionic contrast did not cause any discernible inflammatory response in the lungs, suggesting that it may be the safest contrast for videofluoroscopic swallow studies. Level of Evidence: NA.

KW - acute response

KW - Contrast agents

KW - inflammatory cells

KW - inflammatory cytokines

KW - lung

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057008305&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057008305&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lary.27663

DO - 10.1002/lary.27663

M3 - Article

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

ER -