Acute cervical spine injuries

Prospective MR imaging assessment at a level 1 trauma center

Richard W Katzberg, Philip F. Benedetti, Christiana M. Drake, Marija Ivanovic, Richard A. Levine, Carol S. Beatty, William R. Nemzek, Russell A. McFall, Francesca K. Ontell, Dorene M. Bishop, Virginia C. Poirier, Brian W. Chong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

104 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the weighted average sensitivity of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the prospective detection of acute neck injury and to compare these findings with those of a comprehensive conventional radiographic assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Conventional radiography and MR imaging were performed in 199 patients presenting to a level 1 trauma center with suspected cervical spine injury. Weighted sensitivities and specificities were calculated, and a weighted average across eight vertebral levels from C1 to T1 was formed. Fourteen parameters indicative of acute injury were tabulated. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients had 172 acute cervical injuries. MR imaging depicted 136 (79%) acute abnormalities and conventional radiography depicted 39 (23%). For assessment of acute fractures, MR images (weighted average sensitivity, 43%; CI: 21%, 66%) were comparable to conventional radiographs (weighted average sensitivity, 48%; CI: 30%, 65%). MR imaging was superior to conventional radiography in the evaluation of pre- or paravertebral hemorrhage or edema, anterior or posterior longitudinal ligament injury, traumatic disk herniation, cord edema, and cord compression. Cord injuries were associated with cervical spine spondylosis (P < .05), acute fracture (P < .001), and canal stenosis (P < .001). CONCLUSION: MR imaging is more accurate than radiography in the detection of a wide spectrum of neck injuries, and further study is warranted of its potential effect on medical decision making, clinical outcome, and cost-effectiveness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)203-212
Number of pages10
JournalRadiology
Volume213
Issue number1
StatePublished - Oct 1999

Fingerprint

Trauma Centers
Spine
Radiography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Longitudinal Ligaments
Wounds and Injuries
Neck Injuries
Edema
Spondylosis
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Pathologic Constriction
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Hemorrhage
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies
  • Spinal cord, injuries
  • Spine, CT
  • Spine, injuries
  • Spine, MR
  • Spine, radiography
  • Trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Katzberg, R. W., Benedetti, P. F., Drake, C. M., Ivanovic, M., Levine, R. A., Beatty, C. S., ... Chong, B. W. (1999). Acute cervical spine injuries: Prospective MR imaging assessment at a level 1 trauma center. Radiology, 213(1), 203-212.

Acute cervical spine injuries : Prospective MR imaging assessment at a level 1 trauma center. / Katzberg, Richard W; Benedetti, Philip F.; Drake, Christiana M.; Ivanovic, Marija; Levine, Richard A.; Beatty, Carol S.; Nemzek, William R.; McFall, Russell A.; Ontell, Francesca K.; Bishop, Dorene M.; Poirier, Virginia C.; Chong, Brian W.

In: Radiology, Vol. 213, No. 1, 10.1999, p. 203-212.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Katzberg, RW, Benedetti, PF, Drake, CM, Ivanovic, M, Levine, RA, Beatty, CS, Nemzek, WR, McFall, RA, Ontell, FK, Bishop, DM, Poirier, VC & Chong, BW 1999, 'Acute cervical spine injuries: Prospective MR imaging assessment at a level 1 trauma center', Radiology, vol. 213, no. 1, pp. 203-212.
Katzberg RW, Benedetti PF, Drake CM, Ivanovic M, Levine RA, Beatty CS et al. Acute cervical spine injuries: Prospective MR imaging assessment at a level 1 trauma center. Radiology. 1999 Oct;213(1):203-212.
Katzberg, Richard W ; Benedetti, Philip F. ; Drake, Christiana M. ; Ivanovic, Marija ; Levine, Richard A. ; Beatty, Carol S. ; Nemzek, William R. ; McFall, Russell A. ; Ontell, Francesca K. ; Bishop, Dorene M. ; Poirier, Virginia C. ; Chong, Brian W. / Acute cervical spine injuries : Prospective MR imaging assessment at a level 1 trauma center. In: Radiology. 1999 ; Vol. 213, No. 1. pp. 203-212.
@article{33b3cc21ba354d37911aa834553dc466,
title = "Acute cervical spine injuries: Prospective MR imaging assessment at a level 1 trauma center",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To determine the weighted average sensitivity of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the prospective detection of acute neck injury and to compare these findings with those of a comprehensive conventional radiographic assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Conventional radiography and MR imaging were performed in 199 patients presenting to a level 1 trauma center with suspected cervical spine injury. Weighted sensitivities and specificities were calculated, and a weighted average across eight vertebral levels from C1 to T1 was formed. Fourteen parameters indicative of acute injury were tabulated. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients had 172 acute cervical injuries. MR imaging depicted 136 (79{\%}) acute abnormalities and conventional radiography depicted 39 (23{\%}). For assessment of acute fractures, MR images (weighted average sensitivity, 43{\%}; CI: 21{\%}, 66{\%}) were comparable to conventional radiographs (weighted average sensitivity, 48{\%}; CI: 30{\%}, 65{\%}). MR imaging was superior to conventional radiography in the evaluation of pre- or paravertebral hemorrhage or edema, anterior or posterior longitudinal ligament injury, traumatic disk herniation, cord edema, and cord compression. Cord injuries were associated with cervical spine spondylosis (P < .05), acute fracture (P < .001), and canal stenosis (P < .001). CONCLUSION: MR imaging is more accurate than radiography in the detection of a wide spectrum of neck injuries, and further study is warranted of its potential effect on medical decision making, clinical outcome, and cost-effectiveness.",
keywords = "Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies, Spinal cord, injuries, Spine, CT, Spine, injuries, Spine, MR, Spine, radiography, Trauma",
author = "Katzberg, {Richard W} and Benedetti, {Philip F.} and Drake, {Christiana M.} and Marija Ivanovic and Levine, {Richard A.} and Beatty, {Carol S.} and Nemzek, {William R.} and McFall, {Russell A.} and Ontell, {Francesca K.} and Bishop, {Dorene M.} and Poirier, {Virginia C.} and Chong, {Brian W.}",
year = "1999",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "213",
pages = "203--212",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acute cervical spine injuries

T2 - Prospective MR imaging assessment at a level 1 trauma center

AU - Katzberg, Richard W

AU - Benedetti, Philip F.

AU - Drake, Christiana M.

AU - Ivanovic, Marija

AU - Levine, Richard A.

AU - Beatty, Carol S.

AU - Nemzek, William R.

AU - McFall, Russell A.

AU - Ontell, Francesca K.

AU - Bishop, Dorene M.

AU - Poirier, Virginia C.

AU - Chong, Brian W.

PY - 1999/10

Y1 - 1999/10

N2 - PURPOSE: To determine the weighted average sensitivity of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the prospective detection of acute neck injury and to compare these findings with those of a comprehensive conventional radiographic assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Conventional radiography and MR imaging were performed in 199 patients presenting to a level 1 trauma center with suspected cervical spine injury. Weighted sensitivities and specificities were calculated, and a weighted average across eight vertebral levels from C1 to T1 was formed. Fourteen parameters indicative of acute injury were tabulated. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients had 172 acute cervical injuries. MR imaging depicted 136 (79%) acute abnormalities and conventional radiography depicted 39 (23%). For assessment of acute fractures, MR images (weighted average sensitivity, 43%; CI: 21%, 66%) were comparable to conventional radiographs (weighted average sensitivity, 48%; CI: 30%, 65%). MR imaging was superior to conventional radiography in the evaluation of pre- or paravertebral hemorrhage or edema, anterior or posterior longitudinal ligament injury, traumatic disk herniation, cord edema, and cord compression. Cord injuries were associated with cervical spine spondylosis (P < .05), acute fracture (P < .001), and canal stenosis (P < .001). CONCLUSION: MR imaging is more accurate than radiography in the detection of a wide spectrum of neck injuries, and further study is warranted of its potential effect on medical decision making, clinical outcome, and cost-effectiveness.

AB - PURPOSE: To determine the weighted average sensitivity of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the prospective detection of acute neck injury and to compare these findings with those of a comprehensive conventional radiographic assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Conventional radiography and MR imaging were performed in 199 patients presenting to a level 1 trauma center with suspected cervical spine injury. Weighted sensitivities and specificities were calculated, and a weighted average across eight vertebral levels from C1 to T1 was formed. Fourteen parameters indicative of acute injury were tabulated. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients had 172 acute cervical injuries. MR imaging depicted 136 (79%) acute abnormalities and conventional radiography depicted 39 (23%). For assessment of acute fractures, MR images (weighted average sensitivity, 43%; CI: 21%, 66%) were comparable to conventional radiographs (weighted average sensitivity, 48%; CI: 30%, 65%). MR imaging was superior to conventional radiography in the evaluation of pre- or paravertebral hemorrhage or edema, anterior or posterior longitudinal ligament injury, traumatic disk herniation, cord edema, and cord compression. Cord injuries were associated with cervical spine spondylosis (P < .05), acute fracture (P < .001), and canal stenosis (P < .001). CONCLUSION: MR imaging is more accurate than radiography in the detection of a wide spectrum of neck injuries, and further study is warranted of its potential effect on medical decision making, clinical outcome, and cost-effectiveness.

KW - Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies

KW - Spinal cord, injuries

KW - Spine, CT

KW - Spine, injuries

KW - Spine, MR

KW - Spine, radiography

KW - Trauma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032886448&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032886448&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 213

SP - 203

EP - 212

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 1

ER -