ACR appropriateness criteria head trauma - Child

Maura E. Ryan, Susan Palasis, Gaurav Saigal, Adam D. Singer, Boaz Karmazyn, Molly E. Dempsey, Jonathan R. Dillman, Christopher E. Dory, Matthew Garber, Laura L. Hayes, Ramesh S. Iyer, Catherine A. Mazzola, Molly E. Raske, Henry E. Rice, Cynthia K. Rigsby, Paul R. Sierzenski, Peter J. Strouse, Sjirk J. Westra, Sandra L. Wootton-Gorges, Brian D. Coley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Head trauma is a frequent indication for cranial imaging in children. CT is considered the first line of study for suspected intracranial injury because of its wide availability and rapid detection of acute hemorrhage. However, the majority of childhood head injuries occur without neurologic complications, and particular consideration should be given to the greater risks of ionizing radiation in young patients in the decision to use CT for those with mild head trauma. MRI can detect traumatic complications without radiation, but often requires sedation in children, owing to the examination length and motion sensitivity, which limits rapid assessment and exposes the patient to potential anesthesia risks. MRI may be helpful in patients with suspected nonaccidental trauma, with which axonal shear injury and ischemia are more common and documentation is critical, as well as in those whose clinical status is discordant with CT findings. Advanced techniques, such as diffusion tensor imaging, may identify changes occult by standard imaging, but data are currently insufficient to support routine clinical use.The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)939-947
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology
Volume11
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2014

Fingerprint

Craniocerebral Trauma
Wounds and Injuries
Guidelines
Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Expert Testimony
Ionizing Radiation
Documentation
Nervous System
Ischemia
Anesthesia
Radiation
Hemorrhage
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Appropriateness criteria
  • CT
  • head trauma
  • MRI
  • nonaccidental injury
  • pediatric

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Ryan, M. E., Palasis, S., Saigal, G., Singer, A. D., Karmazyn, B., Dempsey, M. E., ... Coley, B. D. (2014). ACR appropriateness criteria head trauma - Child. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 11(10), 939-947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2014.07.017

ACR appropriateness criteria head trauma - Child. / Ryan, Maura E.; Palasis, Susan; Saigal, Gaurav; Singer, Adam D.; Karmazyn, Boaz; Dempsey, Molly E.; Dillman, Jonathan R.; Dory, Christopher E.; Garber, Matthew; Hayes, Laura L.; Iyer, Ramesh S.; Mazzola, Catherine A.; Raske, Molly E.; Rice, Henry E.; Rigsby, Cynthia K.; Sierzenski, Paul R.; Strouse, Peter J.; Westra, Sjirk J.; Wootton-Gorges, Sandra L.; Coley, Brian D.

In: Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 11, No. 10, 01.10.2014, p. 939-947.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ryan, ME, Palasis, S, Saigal, G, Singer, AD, Karmazyn, B, Dempsey, ME, Dillman, JR, Dory, CE, Garber, M, Hayes, LL, Iyer, RS, Mazzola, CA, Raske, ME, Rice, HE, Rigsby, CK, Sierzenski, PR, Strouse, PJ, Westra, SJ, Wootton-Gorges, SL & Coley, BD 2014, 'ACR appropriateness criteria head trauma - Child', Journal of the American College of Radiology, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 939-947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2014.07.017
Ryan ME, Palasis S, Saigal G, Singer AD, Karmazyn B, Dempsey ME et al. ACR appropriateness criteria head trauma - Child. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2014 Oct 1;11(10):939-947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2014.07.017
Ryan, Maura E. ; Palasis, Susan ; Saigal, Gaurav ; Singer, Adam D. ; Karmazyn, Boaz ; Dempsey, Molly E. ; Dillman, Jonathan R. ; Dory, Christopher E. ; Garber, Matthew ; Hayes, Laura L. ; Iyer, Ramesh S. ; Mazzola, Catherine A. ; Raske, Molly E. ; Rice, Henry E. ; Rigsby, Cynthia K. ; Sierzenski, Paul R. ; Strouse, Peter J. ; Westra, Sjirk J. ; Wootton-Gorges, Sandra L. ; Coley, Brian D. / ACR appropriateness criteria head trauma - Child. In: Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2014 ; Vol. 11, No. 10. pp. 939-947.
@article{904d315da61d401a94249a7b9cd955f2,
title = "ACR appropriateness criteria head trauma - Child",
abstract = "Head trauma is a frequent indication for cranial imaging in children. CT is considered the first line of study for suspected intracranial injury because of its wide availability and rapid detection of acute hemorrhage. However, the majority of childhood head injuries occur without neurologic complications, and particular consideration should be given to the greater risks of ionizing radiation in young patients in the decision to use CT for those with mild head trauma. MRI can detect traumatic complications without radiation, but often requires sedation in children, owing to the examination length and motion sensitivity, which limits rapid assessment and exposes the patient to potential anesthesia risks. MRI may be helpful in patients with suspected nonaccidental trauma, with which axonal shear injury and ischemia are more common and documentation is critical, as well as in those whose clinical status is discordant with CT findings. Advanced techniques, such as diffusion tensor imaging, may identify changes occult by standard imaging, but data are currently insufficient to support routine clinical use.The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.",
keywords = "Appropriateness criteria, CT, head trauma, MRI, nonaccidental injury, pediatric",
author = "Ryan, {Maura E.} and Susan Palasis and Gaurav Saigal and Singer, {Adam D.} and Boaz Karmazyn and Dempsey, {Molly E.} and Dillman, {Jonathan R.} and Dory, {Christopher E.} and Matthew Garber and Hayes, {Laura L.} and Iyer, {Ramesh S.} and Mazzola, {Catherine A.} and Raske, {Molly E.} and Rice, {Henry E.} and Rigsby, {Cynthia K.} and Sierzenski, {Paul R.} and Strouse, {Peter J.} and Westra, {Sjirk J.} and Wootton-Gorges, {Sandra L.} and Coley, {Brian D.}",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacr.2014.07.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "939--947",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Radiology",
issn = "1558-349X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ACR appropriateness criteria head trauma - Child

AU - Ryan, Maura E.

AU - Palasis, Susan

AU - Saigal, Gaurav

AU - Singer, Adam D.

AU - Karmazyn, Boaz

AU - Dempsey, Molly E.

AU - Dillman, Jonathan R.

AU - Dory, Christopher E.

AU - Garber, Matthew

AU - Hayes, Laura L.

AU - Iyer, Ramesh S.

AU - Mazzola, Catherine A.

AU - Raske, Molly E.

AU - Rice, Henry E.

AU - Rigsby, Cynthia K.

AU - Sierzenski, Paul R.

AU - Strouse, Peter J.

AU - Westra, Sjirk J.

AU - Wootton-Gorges, Sandra L.

AU - Coley, Brian D.

PY - 2014/10/1

Y1 - 2014/10/1

N2 - Head trauma is a frequent indication for cranial imaging in children. CT is considered the first line of study for suspected intracranial injury because of its wide availability and rapid detection of acute hemorrhage. However, the majority of childhood head injuries occur without neurologic complications, and particular consideration should be given to the greater risks of ionizing radiation in young patients in the decision to use CT for those with mild head trauma. MRI can detect traumatic complications without radiation, but often requires sedation in children, owing to the examination length and motion sensitivity, which limits rapid assessment and exposes the patient to potential anesthesia risks. MRI may be helpful in patients with suspected nonaccidental trauma, with which axonal shear injury and ischemia are more common and documentation is critical, as well as in those whose clinical status is discordant with CT findings. Advanced techniques, such as diffusion tensor imaging, may identify changes occult by standard imaging, but data are currently insufficient to support routine clinical use.The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

AB - Head trauma is a frequent indication for cranial imaging in children. CT is considered the first line of study for suspected intracranial injury because of its wide availability and rapid detection of acute hemorrhage. However, the majority of childhood head injuries occur without neurologic complications, and particular consideration should be given to the greater risks of ionizing radiation in young patients in the decision to use CT for those with mild head trauma. MRI can detect traumatic complications without radiation, but often requires sedation in children, owing to the examination length and motion sensitivity, which limits rapid assessment and exposes the patient to potential anesthesia risks. MRI may be helpful in patients with suspected nonaccidental trauma, with which axonal shear injury and ischemia are more common and documentation is critical, as well as in those whose clinical status is discordant with CT findings. Advanced techniques, such as diffusion tensor imaging, may identify changes occult by standard imaging, but data are currently insufficient to support routine clinical use.The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

KW - Appropriateness criteria

KW - CT

KW - head trauma

KW - MRI

KW - nonaccidental injury

KW - pediatric

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928096244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928096244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.07.017

DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.07.017

M3 - Article

C2 - 25164794

AN - SCOPUS:84928096244

VL - 11

SP - 939

EP - 947

JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology

SN - 1558-349X

IS - 10

ER -