Accuracy of thin-layer cytology in patients undergoing cervical cone biopsy

C. Bergeron, John W Bishop, A. Lemarie, F. Cas, J. Ayivi, B. Huynh, R. Barrasso

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of thin-layer cytology with Autocyte PREP® (TriPath Imaging Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) with conventional smears in 500 women undergoing cervical cone biopsy. STUDY DESIGN: The study was performed among 500 consecutive women presenting for cone biopsy for high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on biopsy in 350 (70%) and discrepant cytology/colpohistology in 150 (30%). Before performing a cone biopsy, two cervical samples were collected for conventional smears and thin-layer cytologic slides, with randomization of the order. Conventional smears were stained and diagnosed at Pasteur Cerba, while thin-layer cytologic slides were processed at a local TriPath office (Meylan, France) and sent in a masked fashion for screening at Pasteur Cerba. Any slides initially read as normal were reviewed again and reported without knowledge of the other cytologic or cone biopsy data. The final cytologic diagnoses for the two methods were compared with histopathology of the cone biopsy. RESULTS: The conventional smear was unsatisfactory in 58 (11.6%) of cases, while there were 4 (0.8%) unsatisfactory thin-layer cytologic slides (P < .001). Endocervical cells were missing from 31 (6.2%) of conventional smears and 34 (6.8%) of thin-layer cytologic slides. For the pooled data, sensitivities of conventional smear and thin layer for detecting high grade CIN (0.82% and 0.86%, respectively) were similar as were specificities (0.40% and 0.43%, respectively). When first samples were compared, the sensitivities of the conventional smear and thin layer for high grade CIN were 0.79% and 0.89%, respectively (P = .02), with corresponding specificities of 0.41% and 0.36% (P < .01). CONCLUSION: When controlled for sample order, the sensitivity of thin-layer cytology for detecting high grade CIN was significantly higher than that of conventional smears in patients with previous abnormal cytology, but at the expense of specificity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)519-524
Number of pages6
JournalActa Cytologica
Volume45
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cell Biology
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
Smear Layer
Biopsy
Random Allocation
France

Keywords

  • Cervical smears
  • Cervix neoplasms
  • Mass screening
  • Thin-layer cytology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy
  • Cell Biology
  • Histology

Cite this

Bergeron, C., Bishop, J. W., Lemarie, A., Cas, F., Ayivi, J., Huynh, B., & Barrasso, R. (2001). Accuracy of thin-layer cytology in patients undergoing cervical cone biopsy. Acta Cytologica, 45(4), 519-524.

Accuracy of thin-layer cytology in patients undergoing cervical cone biopsy. / Bergeron, C.; Bishop, John W; Lemarie, A.; Cas, F.; Ayivi, J.; Huynh, B.; Barrasso, R.

In: Acta Cytologica, Vol. 45, No. 4, 2001, p. 519-524.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bergeron, C, Bishop, JW, Lemarie, A, Cas, F, Ayivi, J, Huynh, B & Barrasso, R 2001, 'Accuracy of thin-layer cytology in patients undergoing cervical cone biopsy', Acta Cytologica, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 519-524.
Bergeron C, Bishop JW, Lemarie A, Cas F, Ayivi J, Huynh B et al. Accuracy of thin-layer cytology in patients undergoing cervical cone biopsy. Acta Cytologica. 2001;45(4):519-524.
Bergeron, C. ; Bishop, John W ; Lemarie, A. ; Cas, F. ; Ayivi, J. ; Huynh, B. ; Barrasso, R. / Accuracy of thin-layer cytology in patients undergoing cervical cone biopsy. In: Acta Cytologica. 2001 ; Vol. 45, No. 4. pp. 519-524.
@article{8776e46553654a258cea2cb14281b8ee,
title = "Accuracy of thin-layer cytology in patients undergoing cervical cone biopsy",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of thin-layer cytology with Autocyte PREP{\circledR} (TriPath Imaging Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) with conventional smears in 500 women undergoing cervical cone biopsy. STUDY DESIGN: The study was performed among 500 consecutive women presenting for cone biopsy for high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on biopsy in 350 (70{\%}) and discrepant cytology/colpohistology in 150 (30{\%}). Before performing a cone biopsy, two cervical samples were collected for conventional smears and thin-layer cytologic slides, with randomization of the order. Conventional smears were stained and diagnosed at Pasteur Cerba, while thin-layer cytologic slides were processed at a local TriPath office (Meylan, France) and sent in a masked fashion for screening at Pasteur Cerba. Any slides initially read as normal were reviewed again and reported without knowledge of the other cytologic or cone biopsy data. The final cytologic diagnoses for the two methods were compared with histopathology of the cone biopsy. RESULTS: The conventional smear was unsatisfactory in 58 (11.6{\%}) of cases, while there were 4 (0.8{\%}) unsatisfactory thin-layer cytologic slides (P < .001). Endocervical cells were missing from 31 (6.2{\%}) of conventional smears and 34 (6.8{\%}) of thin-layer cytologic slides. For the pooled data, sensitivities of conventional smear and thin layer for detecting high grade CIN (0.82{\%} and 0.86{\%}, respectively) were similar as were specificities (0.40{\%} and 0.43{\%}, respectively). When first samples were compared, the sensitivities of the conventional smear and thin layer for high grade CIN were 0.79{\%} and 0.89{\%}, respectively (P = .02), with corresponding specificities of 0.41{\%} and 0.36{\%} (P < .01). CONCLUSION: When controlled for sample order, the sensitivity of thin-layer cytology for detecting high grade CIN was significantly higher than that of conventional smears in patients with previous abnormal cytology, but at the expense of specificity.",
keywords = "Cervical smears, Cervix neoplasms, Mass screening, Thin-layer cytology",
author = "C. Bergeron and Bishop, {John W} and A. Lemarie and F. Cas and J. Ayivi and B. Huynh and R. Barrasso",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "519--524",
journal = "Acta Cytologica",
issn = "0001-5547",
publisher = "Science Printers and Publishers Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of thin-layer cytology in patients undergoing cervical cone biopsy

AU - Bergeron, C.

AU - Bishop, John W

AU - Lemarie, A.

AU - Cas, F.

AU - Ayivi, J.

AU - Huynh, B.

AU - Barrasso, R.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of thin-layer cytology with Autocyte PREP® (TriPath Imaging Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) with conventional smears in 500 women undergoing cervical cone biopsy. STUDY DESIGN: The study was performed among 500 consecutive women presenting for cone biopsy for high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on biopsy in 350 (70%) and discrepant cytology/colpohistology in 150 (30%). Before performing a cone biopsy, two cervical samples were collected for conventional smears and thin-layer cytologic slides, with randomization of the order. Conventional smears were stained and diagnosed at Pasteur Cerba, while thin-layer cytologic slides were processed at a local TriPath office (Meylan, France) and sent in a masked fashion for screening at Pasteur Cerba. Any slides initially read as normal were reviewed again and reported without knowledge of the other cytologic or cone biopsy data. The final cytologic diagnoses for the two methods were compared with histopathology of the cone biopsy. RESULTS: The conventional smear was unsatisfactory in 58 (11.6%) of cases, while there were 4 (0.8%) unsatisfactory thin-layer cytologic slides (P < .001). Endocervical cells were missing from 31 (6.2%) of conventional smears and 34 (6.8%) of thin-layer cytologic slides. For the pooled data, sensitivities of conventional smear and thin layer for detecting high grade CIN (0.82% and 0.86%, respectively) were similar as were specificities (0.40% and 0.43%, respectively). When first samples were compared, the sensitivities of the conventional smear and thin layer for high grade CIN were 0.79% and 0.89%, respectively (P = .02), with corresponding specificities of 0.41% and 0.36% (P < .01). CONCLUSION: When controlled for sample order, the sensitivity of thin-layer cytology for detecting high grade CIN was significantly higher than that of conventional smears in patients with previous abnormal cytology, but at the expense of specificity.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of thin-layer cytology with Autocyte PREP® (TriPath Imaging Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) with conventional smears in 500 women undergoing cervical cone biopsy. STUDY DESIGN: The study was performed among 500 consecutive women presenting for cone biopsy for high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on biopsy in 350 (70%) and discrepant cytology/colpohistology in 150 (30%). Before performing a cone biopsy, two cervical samples were collected for conventional smears and thin-layer cytologic slides, with randomization of the order. Conventional smears were stained and diagnosed at Pasteur Cerba, while thin-layer cytologic slides were processed at a local TriPath office (Meylan, France) and sent in a masked fashion for screening at Pasteur Cerba. Any slides initially read as normal were reviewed again and reported without knowledge of the other cytologic or cone biopsy data. The final cytologic diagnoses for the two methods were compared with histopathology of the cone biopsy. RESULTS: The conventional smear was unsatisfactory in 58 (11.6%) of cases, while there were 4 (0.8%) unsatisfactory thin-layer cytologic slides (P < .001). Endocervical cells were missing from 31 (6.2%) of conventional smears and 34 (6.8%) of thin-layer cytologic slides. For the pooled data, sensitivities of conventional smear and thin layer for detecting high grade CIN (0.82% and 0.86%, respectively) were similar as were specificities (0.40% and 0.43%, respectively). When first samples were compared, the sensitivities of the conventional smear and thin layer for high grade CIN were 0.79% and 0.89%, respectively (P = .02), with corresponding specificities of 0.41% and 0.36% (P < .01). CONCLUSION: When controlled for sample order, the sensitivity of thin-layer cytology for detecting high grade CIN was significantly higher than that of conventional smears in patients with previous abnormal cytology, but at the expense of specificity.

KW - Cervical smears

KW - Cervix neoplasms

KW - Mass screening

KW - Thin-layer cytology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034922649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034922649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11480712

AN - SCOPUS:0034922649

VL - 45

SP - 519

EP - 524

JO - Acta Cytologica

JF - Acta Cytologica

SN - 0001-5547

IS - 4

ER -