Accuracy of blood pressure measurements reported in an electronic medical record during routine primary care visits

Paul A. Fishman, Melissa L. Anderson, Andrea J. Cook, James D. Ralston, Sheryl L Catz, Jim Carlson, Eric B. Larson, Beverly B. Green

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Electronic medical records (EMRs) allow for real-time access to blood pressure (BP) information on a population basis and improve identification and treatment of individuals with hypertension. Despite the potential uses of the data available from EMRs, relatively little research has examined the reliability of this data. To address this gap, the authors examined the reliability of BP taken at primary care visits and recorded in an EMR with those taken at a research study visit at which standard protocols were used to measure BP among all adults as well as by sex and age. Systolic BP (SBP) averaged 3.7 (17.3) points and diastolic BP (DBP) was 2.8 (10.6) points lower in the EMR than in the study visit across age and sex groups, with all differences statistically significant. For this cohort of patients with a diagnosis of hypertension, there was moderate correlation between BP measurements taken in clinic and at research. However, BP control for individuals, as defined by an SBP <140mmHg and DBP 90mmHg, differed by almost 25%. Known variability of BP and clinic procedures for measuring and recording BP may account for these differences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)821-828
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Clinical Hypertension
Volume13
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Electronic Health Records
Primary Health Care
Blood Pressure
Research
Hypertension
Age Groups

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Accuracy of blood pressure measurements reported in an electronic medical record during routine primary care visits. / Fishman, Paul A.; Anderson, Melissa L.; Cook, Andrea J.; Ralston, James D.; Catz, Sheryl L; Carlson, Jim; Larson, Eric B.; Green, Beverly B.

In: Journal of Clinical Hypertension, Vol. 13, No. 11, 11.2011, p. 821-828.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fishman, Paul A. ; Anderson, Melissa L. ; Cook, Andrea J. ; Ralston, James D. ; Catz, Sheryl L ; Carlson, Jim ; Larson, Eric B. ; Green, Beverly B. / Accuracy of blood pressure measurements reported in an electronic medical record during routine primary care visits. In: Journal of Clinical Hypertension. 2011 ; Vol. 13, No. 11. pp. 821-828.
@article{65c2eab16eb14505b7d37dc4f3d55683,
title = "Accuracy of blood pressure measurements reported in an electronic medical record during routine primary care visits",
abstract = "Electronic medical records (EMRs) allow for real-time access to blood pressure (BP) information on a population basis and improve identification and treatment of individuals with hypertension. Despite the potential uses of the data available from EMRs, relatively little research has examined the reliability of this data. To address this gap, the authors examined the reliability of BP taken at primary care visits and recorded in an EMR with those taken at a research study visit at which standard protocols were used to measure BP among all adults as well as by sex and age. Systolic BP (SBP) averaged 3.7 (17.3) points and diastolic BP (DBP) was 2.8 (10.6) points lower in the EMR than in the study visit across age and sex groups, with all differences statistically significant. For this cohort of patients with a diagnosis of hypertension, there was moderate correlation between BP measurements taken in clinic and at research. However, BP control for individuals, as defined by an SBP <140mmHg and DBP 90mmHg, differed by almost 25{\%}. Known variability of BP and clinic procedures for measuring and recording BP may account for these differences.",
author = "Fishman, {Paul A.} and Anderson, {Melissa L.} and Cook, {Andrea J.} and Ralston, {James D.} and Catz, {Sheryl L} and Jim Carlson and Larson, {Eric B.} and Green, {Beverly B.}",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00528.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "821--828",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Hypertension",
issn = "1524-6175",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of blood pressure measurements reported in an electronic medical record during routine primary care visits

AU - Fishman, Paul A.

AU - Anderson, Melissa L.

AU - Cook, Andrea J.

AU - Ralston, James D.

AU - Catz, Sheryl L

AU - Carlson, Jim

AU - Larson, Eric B.

AU - Green, Beverly B.

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - Electronic medical records (EMRs) allow for real-time access to blood pressure (BP) information on a population basis and improve identification and treatment of individuals with hypertension. Despite the potential uses of the data available from EMRs, relatively little research has examined the reliability of this data. To address this gap, the authors examined the reliability of BP taken at primary care visits and recorded in an EMR with those taken at a research study visit at which standard protocols were used to measure BP among all adults as well as by sex and age. Systolic BP (SBP) averaged 3.7 (17.3) points and diastolic BP (DBP) was 2.8 (10.6) points lower in the EMR than in the study visit across age and sex groups, with all differences statistically significant. For this cohort of patients with a diagnosis of hypertension, there was moderate correlation between BP measurements taken in clinic and at research. However, BP control for individuals, as defined by an SBP <140mmHg and DBP 90mmHg, differed by almost 25%. Known variability of BP and clinic procedures for measuring and recording BP may account for these differences.

AB - Electronic medical records (EMRs) allow for real-time access to blood pressure (BP) information on a population basis and improve identification and treatment of individuals with hypertension. Despite the potential uses of the data available from EMRs, relatively little research has examined the reliability of this data. To address this gap, the authors examined the reliability of BP taken at primary care visits and recorded in an EMR with those taken at a research study visit at which standard protocols were used to measure BP among all adults as well as by sex and age. Systolic BP (SBP) averaged 3.7 (17.3) points and diastolic BP (DBP) was 2.8 (10.6) points lower in the EMR than in the study visit across age and sex groups, with all differences statistically significant. For this cohort of patients with a diagnosis of hypertension, there was moderate correlation between BP measurements taken in clinic and at research. However, BP control for individuals, as defined by an SBP <140mmHg and DBP 90mmHg, differed by almost 25%. Known variability of BP and clinic procedures for measuring and recording BP may account for these differences.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80355133237&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80355133237&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00528.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00528.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 22051427

AN - SCOPUS:80355133237

VL - 13

SP - 821

EP - 828

JO - Journal of Clinical Hypertension

JF - Journal of Clinical Hypertension

SN - 1524-6175

IS - 11

ER -