A two-phase model of B-cell activation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

107 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The current paradigm of lymphocyte activation, the two-signal model, has developed from the premise that recognition of antigen alone is insufficient to stimulate naive B cells, as this could potentially induce autoreactive responses, and that cognate T-B interaction is necessary to induce a full B-cell response. Recent evidence suggests, however, that T-cell-independent B-cell activation is part of the humoral immune response to pathogens, and therefore that antigen alone, or antigen plus signals provided by ceils other than T cells, can provide all the necessary signals to induce a B-cell response. Furthermore, the presence of secreted IgM produced either as natural antibodies by CD5+ B-1 cells or as antigen-induced IgM by conventional (B-2) cells was shown to affect the kinetics and magnitude of the IgG response significantly. These data and the observed rapid kinetics of in vivo humoral responses seem at odds with a model that predicts that full B-cell activation and expansion is delayed until sufficient T-cell help is generated. I will therefore argue here that, in response to an infection, initial clonal B-cell expansion and secretion of IgM occurs in a T-cell-independent fashion (phase I) driven by the presence of antigen, and that secreted IgM serves as an autocrine growth factor at this time. B-cell-T-cell interaction occurs only during phase II of the response, thereby initiating the germinal center reaction, isotype switching and memory B-cell development. Hence, this model provides an explanation of how B-cell responses are induced rapidly in vivo at a time when T-cell help is rare.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)171-180
Number of pages10
JournalImmunological Reviews
Volume176
StatePublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

B-Lymphocytes
T-Lymphocytes
Immunoglobulin M
Antigens
Immunoglobulin Class Switching
Germinal Center
Lymphocyte Activation
Humoral Immunity
Cell Communication
Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins
Immunoglobulin G
Antibodies
Infection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology

Cite this

A two-phase model of B-cell activation. / Baumgarth, Nicole.

In: Immunological Reviews, Vol. 176, 2000, p. 171-180.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{839aa3d88cbe4cd99806d471a50d7c56,
title = "A two-phase model of B-cell activation",
abstract = "The current paradigm of lymphocyte activation, the two-signal model, has developed from the premise that recognition of antigen alone is insufficient to stimulate naive B cells, as this could potentially induce autoreactive responses, and that cognate T-B interaction is necessary to induce a full B-cell response. Recent evidence suggests, however, that T-cell-independent B-cell activation is part of the humoral immune response to pathogens, and therefore that antigen alone, or antigen plus signals provided by ceils other than T cells, can provide all the necessary signals to induce a B-cell response. Furthermore, the presence of secreted IgM produced either as natural antibodies by CD5+ B-1 cells or as antigen-induced IgM by conventional (B-2) cells was shown to affect the kinetics and magnitude of the IgG response significantly. These data and the observed rapid kinetics of in vivo humoral responses seem at odds with a model that predicts that full B-cell activation and expansion is delayed until sufficient T-cell help is generated. I will therefore argue here that, in response to an infection, initial clonal B-cell expansion and secretion of IgM occurs in a T-cell-independent fashion (phase I) driven by the presence of antigen, and that secreted IgM serves as an autocrine growth factor at this time. B-cell-T-cell interaction occurs only during phase II of the response, thereby initiating the germinal center reaction, isotype switching and memory B-cell development. Hence, this model provides an explanation of how B-cell responses are induced rapidly in vivo at a time when T-cell help is rare.",
author = "Nicole Baumgarth",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "176",
pages = "171--180",
journal = "Immunological Reviews",
issn = "0105-2896",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A two-phase model of B-cell activation

AU - Baumgarth, Nicole

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - The current paradigm of lymphocyte activation, the two-signal model, has developed from the premise that recognition of antigen alone is insufficient to stimulate naive B cells, as this could potentially induce autoreactive responses, and that cognate T-B interaction is necessary to induce a full B-cell response. Recent evidence suggests, however, that T-cell-independent B-cell activation is part of the humoral immune response to pathogens, and therefore that antigen alone, or antigen plus signals provided by ceils other than T cells, can provide all the necessary signals to induce a B-cell response. Furthermore, the presence of secreted IgM produced either as natural antibodies by CD5+ B-1 cells or as antigen-induced IgM by conventional (B-2) cells was shown to affect the kinetics and magnitude of the IgG response significantly. These data and the observed rapid kinetics of in vivo humoral responses seem at odds with a model that predicts that full B-cell activation and expansion is delayed until sufficient T-cell help is generated. I will therefore argue here that, in response to an infection, initial clonal B-cell expansion and secretion of IgM occurs in a T-cell-independent fashion (phase I) driven by the presence of antigen, and that secreted IgM serves as an autocrine growth factor at this time. B-cell-T-cell interaction occurs only during phase II of the response, thereby initiating the germinal center reaction, isotype switching and memory B-cell development. Hence, this model provides an explanation of how B-cell responses are induced rapidly in vivo at a time when T-cell help is rare.

AB - The current paradigm of lymphocyte activation, the two-signal model, has developed from the premise that recognition of antigen alone is insufficient to stimulate naive B cells, as this could potentially induce autoreactive responses, and that cognate T-B interaction is necessary to induce a full B-cell response. Recent evidence suggests, however, that T-cell-independent B-cell activation is part of the humoral immune response to pathogens, and therefore that antigen alone, or antigen plus signals provided by ceils other than T cells, can provide all the necessary signals to induce a B-cell response. Furthermore, the presence of secreted IgM produced either as natural antibodies by CD5+ B-1 cells or as antigen-induced IgM by conventional (B-2) cells was shown to affect the kinetics and magnitude of the IgG response significantly. These data and the observed rapid kinetics of in vivo humoral responses seem at odds with a model that predicts that full B-cell activation and expansion is delayed until sufficient T-cell help is generated. I will therefore argue here that, in response to an infection, initial clonal B-cell expansion and secretion of IgM occurs in a T-cell-independent fashion (phase I) driven by the presence of antigen, and that secreted IgM serves as an autocrine growth factor at this time. B-cell-T-cell interaction occurs only during phase II of the response, thereby initiating the germinal center reaction, isotype switching and memory B-cell development. Hence, this model provides an explanation of how B-cell responses are induced rapidly in vivo at a time when T-cell help is rare.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033821991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033821991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11043776

AN - SCOPUS:0033821991

VL - 176

SP - 171

EP - 180

JO - Immunological Reviews

JF - Immunological Reviews

SN - 0105-2896

ER -