A two-level large-volume epidural blood patch protocol for spontaneous intracranial hypotension: Retrospective analysis of risk and benefit

Ryan Martin, Charles Louy, Vijay Babu, Yi Jiang, Azita Far, Wouter Schievink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: We report a retrospective analysis of a two-level, variable-volume epidural blood patch (EBP) technique for the treatment of spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH). Methods: Ninety-four patients with SIH underwent EBPs. Injectate volume was variable and guided by the onset of back pain, radiculopathy or symptoms referable to the EBP. Patients were a responder if no invasive treatment was necessary for SIH symptoms after the first EBP. Baseline patient characteristics, including presenting symptoms and imaging findings, were compared between responders and non-responders. Adverse events were recorded. Results: The mean first EBP volume was 45.3±23.2 (range 4-124 mL). The responder rate was 28.7% after the first EBP, improving to 41.5% and 46.8% after a second and third EBP, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for the greater prevalence of subdural fluid collections in the responder group (48% vs 18%, p=0.003). Two severe complications occurred: transient bilateral paraplegia and cauda equina syndrome from arachnoiditis. Conclusions: Our protocol can be used to treat SIH but carries risks that require meticulous attention. EBP volumes were variable across patients, demonstrating the variability in the elastance of the epidural space. Rigorous monitoring for neurological symptoms is necessary throughout the procedure to limit complications and determine the endpoint of the EBP. We advocate for rigorous confirmation of epidural placement of the EBP with contrast-imaging studies to limit intrathecal placement of blood, which can lead to arachnoiditis. Randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the safety and efficacy of large-volume EBPs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalRegional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Epidural Blood Patch
Intracranial Hypotension
Arachnoiditis
Blood Volume
Polyradiculopathy
Epidural Space
Radiculopathy
Paraplegia
Back Pain
Randomized Controlled Trials

Keywords

  • chronic pain: head and neck
  • pain medicine
  • spinal/epidural injection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

A two-level large-volume epidural blood patch protocol for spontaneous intracranial hypotension : Retrospective analysis of risk and benefit. / Martin, Ryan; Louy, Charles; Babu, Vijay; Jiang, Yi; Far, Azita; Schievink, Wouter.

In: Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fd0e95ccd4714dc8bb438c86095116a4,
title = "A two-level large-volume epidural blood patch protocol for spontaneous intracranial hypotension: Retrospective analysis of risk and benefit",
abstract = "Background: We report a retrospective analysis of a two-level, variable-volume epidural blood patch (EBP) technique for the treatment of spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH). Methods: Ninety-four patients with SIH underwent EBPs. Injectate volume was variable and guided by the onset of back pain, radiculopathy or symptoms referable to the EBP. Patients were a responder if no invasive treatment was necessary for SIH symptoms after the first EBP. Baseline patient characteristics, including presenting symptoms and imaging findings, were compared between responders and non-responders. Adverse events were recorded. Results: The mean first EBP volume was 45.3±23.2 (range 4-124 mL). The responder rate was 28.7{\%} after the first EBP, improving to 41.5{\%} and 46.8{\%} after a second and third EBP, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for the greater prevalence of subdural fluid collections in the responder group (48{\%} vs 18{\%}, p=0.003). Two severe complications occurred: transient bilateral paraplegia and cauda equina syndrome from arachnoiditis. Conclusions: Our protocol can be used to treat SIH but carries risks that require meticulous attention. EBP volumes were variable across patients, demonstrating the variability in the elastance of the epidural space. Rigorous monitoring for neurological symptoms is necessary throughout the procedure to limit complications and determine the endpoint of the EBP. We advocate for rigorous confirmation of epidural placement of the EBP with contrast-imaging studies to limit intrathecal placement of blood, which can lead to arachnoiditis. Randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the safety and efficacy of large-volume EBPs.",
keywords = "chronic pain: head and neck, pain medicine, spinal/epidural injection",
author = "Ryan Martin and Charles Louy and Vijay Babu and Yi Jiang and Azita Far and Wouter Schievink",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/rapm-2018-100158",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine",
issn = "1098-7339",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A two-level large-volume epidural blood patch protocol for spontaneous intracranial hypotension

T2 - Retrospective analysis of risk and benefit

AU - Martin, Ryan

AU - Louy, Charles

AU - Babu, Vijay

AU - Jiang, Yi

AU - Far, Azita

AU - Schievink, Wouter

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: We report a retrospective analysis of a two-level, variable-volume epidural blood patch (EBP) technique for the treatment of spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH). Methods: Ninety-four patients with SIH underwent EBPs. Injectate volume was variable and guided by the onset of back pain, radiculopathy or symptoms referable to the EBP. Patients were a responder if no invasive treatment was necessary for SIH symptoms after the first EBP. Baseline patient characteristics, including presenting symptoms and imaging findings, were compared between responders and non-responders. Adverse events were recorded. Results: The mean first EBP volume was 45.3±23.2 (range 4-124 mL). The responder rate was 28.7% after the first EBP, improving to 41.5% and 46.8% after a second and third EBP, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for the greater prevalence of subdural fluid collections in the responder group (48% vs 18%, p=0.003). Two severe complications occurred: transient bilateral paraplegia and cauda equina syndrome from arachnoiditis. Conclusions: Our protocol can be used to treat SIH but carries risks that require meticulous attention. EBP volumes were variable across patients, demonstrating the variability in the elastance of the epidural space. Rigorous monitoring for neurological symptoms is necessary throughout the procedure to limit complications and determine the endpoint of the EBP. We advocate for rigorous confirmation of epidural placement of the EBP with contrast-imaging studies to limit intrathecal placement of blood, which can lead to arachnoiditis. Randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the safety and efficacy of large-volume EBPs.

AB - Background: We report a retrospective analysis of a two-level, variable-volume epidural blood patch (EBP) technique for the treatment of spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH). Methods: Ninety-four patients with SIH underwent EBPs. Injectate volume was variable and guided by the onset of back pain, radiculopathy or symptoms referable to the EBP. Patients were a responder if no invasive treatment was necessary for SIH symptoms after the first EBP. Baseline patient characteristics, including presenting symptoms and imaging findings, were compared between responders and non-responders. Adverse events were recorded. Results: The mean first EBP volume was 45.3±23.2 (range 4-124 mL). The responder rate was 28.7% after the first EBP, improving to 41.5% and 46.8% after a second and third EBP, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for the greater prevalence of subdural fluid collections in the responder group (48% vs 18%, p=0.003). Two severe complications occurred: transient bilateral paraplegia and cauda equina syndrome from arachnoiditis. Conclusions: Our protocol can be used to treat SIH but carries risks that require meticulous attention. EBP volumes were variable across patients, demonstrating the variability in the elastance of the epidural space. Rigorous monitoring for neurological symptoms is necessary throughout the procedure to limit complications and determine the endpoint of the EBP. We advocate for rigorous confirmation of epidural placement of the EBP with contrast-imaging studies to limit intrathecal placement of blood, which can lead to arachnoiditis. Randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the safety and efficacy of large-volume EBPs.

KW - chronic pain: head and neck

KW - pain medicine

KW - spinal/epidural injection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072620889&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072620889&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/rapm-2018-100158

DO - 10.1136/rapm-2018-100158

M3 - Article

C2 - 31541008

AN - SCOPUS:85072620889

JO - Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

JF - Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

SN - 1098-7339

ER -