A transparent oversight policy for human anatomical specimen management

The university of california, davis experience

Brandi Schmitt, Charlotte Wacker, Lisa Ikemoto, Frederick J Meyers, Claire Pomeroy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors describe the development and implementation of a University of California (UC) system of oversight, education, tracking, and accountability for human anatomical specimen use in education and research activities. This program was created and initially implemented at UC Davis in 2005. Several incidents arising out of the handling of human anatomical specimens at UC campuses revealed significant challenges in the system for maintaining control of human anatomical specimens used in education and research. These events combined to undermine the public perception for research and educational endeavors involving anatomical materials at public institutions. Risks associated with the acquisition, maintenance, and disposal of these specimens were not fully understood by the faculty, staff, and students who used them. Laws governing sources of specimens are grouped with those that govern organ procurement and tissue banking, and sometimes are found in cemetery and funeral regulations. These variables complicate interpretations and may hinder compliance. To regain confidence in the system, the need to set appropriate and realistic guidelines that mitigate risk and facilitate an institution's research and educational mission was identified. This article chronicles a multiyear process in which diverse stakeholders developed (1) a regulatory policy for oversight, (2) a policy education program, (3) procedures for tracking and accountability, and (4) a reporting and enforcement mechanism for appropriate and ethical use of human anatomical specimens in university education and research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)410-414
Number of pages5
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume89
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2014

Fingerprint

Education
university
management
Research
Social Responsibility
education
experience
Medical Waste Disposal
responsibility
regulatory policy
Cemeteries
university research
Tissue Banks
university education
public institution
cemetery
Tissue and Organ Procurement
banking
funeral
incident

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

A transparent oversight policy for human anatomical specimen management : The university of california, davis experience. / Schmitt, Brandi; Wacker, Charlotte; Ikemoto, Lisa; Meyers, Frederick J; Pomeroy, Claire.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 89, No. 3, 03.2014, p. 410-414.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schmitt, Brandi ; Wacker, Charlotte ; Ikemoto, Lisa ; Meyers, Frederick J ; Pomeroy, Claire. / A transparent oversight policy for human anatomical specimen management : The university of california, davis experience. In: Academic Medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 89, No. 3. pp. 410-414.
@article{eea9e87463054e77ae08b8bbe8a38f7b,
title = "A transparent oversight policy for human anatomical specimen management: The university of california, davis experience",
abstract = "The authors describe the development and implementation of a University of California (UC) system of oversight, education, tracking, and accountability for human anatomical specimen use in education and research activities. This program was created and initially implemented at UC Davis in 2005. Several incidents arising out of the handling of human anatomical specimens at UC campuses revealed significant challenges in the system for maintaining control of human anatomical specimens used in education and research. These events combined to undermine the public perception for research and educational endeavors involving anatomical materials at public institutions. Risks associated with the acquisition, maintenance, and disposal of these specimens were not fully understood by the faculty, staff, and students who used them. Laws governing sources of specimens are grouped with those that govern organ procurement and tissue banking, and sometimes are found in cemetery and funeral regulations. These variables complicate interpretations and may hinder compliance. To regain confidence in the system, the need to set appropriate and realistic guidelines that mitigate risk and facilitate an institution's research and educational mission was identified. This article chronicles a multiyear process in which diverse stakeholders developed (1) a regulatory policy for oversight, (2) a policy education program, (3) procedures for tracking and accountability, and (4) a reporting and enforcement mechanism for appropriate and ethical use of human anatomical specimens in university education and research.",
author = "Brandi Schmitt and Charlotte Wacker and Lisa Ikemoto and Meyers, {Frederick J} and Claire Pomeroy",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0000000000000135",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "89",
pages = "410--414",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A transparent oversight policy for human anatomical specimen management

T2 - The university of california, davis experience

AU - Schmitt, Brandi

AU - Wacker, Charlotte

AU - Ikemoto, Lisa

AU - Meyers, Frederick J

AU - Pomeroy, Claire

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - The authors describe the development and implementation of a University of California (UC) system of oversight, education, tracking, and accountability for human anatomical specimen use in education and research activities. This program was created and initially implemented at UC Davis in 2005. Several incidents arising out of the handling of human anatomical specimens at UC campuses revealed significant challenges in the system for maintaining control of human anatomical specimens used in education and research. These events combined to undermine the public perception for research and educational endeavors involving anatomical materials at public institutions. Risks associated with the acquisition, maintenance, and disposal of these specimens were not fully understood by the faculty, staff, and students who used them. Laws governing sources of specimens are grouped with those that govern organ procurement and tissue banking, and sometimes are found in cemetery and funeral regulations. These variables complicate interpretations and may hinder compliance. To regain confidence in the system, the need to set appropriate and realistic guidelines that mitigate risk and facilitate an institution's research and educational mission was identified. This article chronicles a multiyear process in which diverse stakeholders developed (1) a regulatory policy for oversight, (2) a policy education program, (3) procedures for tracking and accountability, and (4) a reporting and enforcement mechanism for appropriate and ethical use of human anatomical specimens in university education and research.

AB - The authors describe the development and implementation of a University of California (UC) system of oversight, education, tracking, and accountability for human anatomical specimen use in education and research activities. This program was created and initially implemented at UC Davis in 2005. Several incidents arising out of the handling of human anatomical specimens at UC campuses revealed significant challenges in the system for maintaining control of human anatomical specimens used in education and research. These events combined to undermine the public perception for research and educational endeavors involving anatomical materials at public institutions. Risks associated with the acquisition, maintenance, and disposal of these specimens were not fully understood by the faculty, staff, and students who used them. Laws governing sources of specimens are grouped with those that govern organ procurement and tissue banking, and sometimes are found in cemetery and funeral regulations. These variables complicate interpretations and may hinder compliance. To regain confidence in the system, the need to set appropriate and realistic guidelines that mitigate risk and facilitate an institution's research and educational mission was identified. This article chronicles a multiyear process in which diverse stakeholders developed (1) a regulatory policy for oversight, (2) a policy education program, (3) procedures for tracking and accountability, and (4) a reporting and enforcement mechanism for appropriate and ethical use of human anatomical specimens in university education and research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894659579&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894659579&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000135

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000135

M3 - Article

VL - 89

SP - 410

EP - 414

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 3

ER -