A survey of criteria used to evaluate applications for small animal surgery residency positions

Jeremy T. Fleming, Michelle A. Giuffrida, William T.N. Culp, Jeffrey J. Runge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To determine attributes of applicants to small animal surgery residency programs (SRP) that are considered important, favorable, or detrimental according to surgeons at SRP registered with the American College of Veterinary Surgeons (ACVS). Study design: Online survey. Sample population: Residency-trained surgeons at ACVS-registered SRP. Methods: An online survey was advertised to eligible surgeons. Respondents anonymously provided information about their professional backgrounds and SRP interview practices and rated candidate attributes in terms of importance during application screening and favorable or detrimental effects during selection or ranking. Responses were compared by respondent practice setting and sex. Results: Surveys were completed by 148 of 289 (51%) invited surgeons. Male and female surgeons were equally represented, and 61% worked in academia. Most respondents’ SRP offered in-person interviews, typically to a select applicant group from whom residents were ultimately chosen. Letters of recommendation were the most influential factor in all phases of application review, particularly when respondents knew the writers. Other critical attributes were academic record, internship reputation, research activity, and indices of interpersonal skills. Nearly all respondents considered multiple prior unsuccessful applications detrimental. Academic respondents emphasized academic performance and academic internships; private practice respondents valued personal contact with applicants and surgical specialty internships. Responses did not differ by self-identified gender. Conclusion: Surgery residency program surgeons preferred first- or second-time applicants with excellent academic credentials, specific internship and research experiences, and letters of support from trusted colleagues as well as strong interpersonal skills. Clinical impact: Prospective residents can use this information to assess their candidacies, identify potential weaknesses, and prepare competitive applications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalVeterinary Surgery
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

surgeons
Internship and Residency
surgery
animals
veterinarians
interviews
academic achievement
gender
Surveys and Questionnaires
Interviews
Surgical Specialties
experimental design
screening
Surgeons
Private Practice
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

A survey of criteria used to evaluate applications for small animal surgery residency positions. / Fleming, Jeremy T.; Giuffrida, Michelle A.; Culp, William T.N.; Runge, Jeffrey J.

In: Veterinary Surgery, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e6d5be4788f04e9dba228b04d7e06e9d,
title = "A survey of criteria used to evaluate applications for small animal surgery residency positions",
abstract = "Objective: To determine attributes of applicants to small animal surgery residency programs (SRP) that are considered important, favorable, or detrimental according to surgeons at SRP registered with the American College of Veterinary Surgeons (ACVS). Study design: Online survey. Sample population: Residency-trained surgeons at ACVS-registered SRP. Methods: An online survey was advertised to eligible surgeons. Respondents anonymously provided information about their professional backgrounds and SRP interview practices and rated candidate attributes in terms of importance during application screening and favorable or detrimental effects during selection or ranking. Responses were compared by respondent practice setting and sex. Results: Surveys were completed by 148 of 289 (51{\%}) invited surgeons. Male and female surgeons were equally represented, and 61{\%} worked in academia. Most respondents’ SRP offered in-person interviews, typically to a select applicant group from whom residents were ultimately chosen. Letters of recommendation were the most influential factor in all phases of application review, particularly when respondents knew the writers. Other critical attributes were academic record, internship reputation, research activity, and indices of interpersonal skills. Nearly all respondents considered multiple prior unsuccessful applications detrimental. Academic respondents emphasized academic performance and academic internships; private practice respondents valued personal contact with applicants and surgical specialty internships. Responses did not differ by self-identified gender. Conclusion: Surgery residency program surgeons preferred first- or second-time applicants with excellent academic credentials, specific internship and research experiences, and letters of support from trusted colleagues as well as strong interpersonal skills. Clinical impact: Prospective residents can use this information to assess their candidacies, identify potential weaknesses, and prepare competitive applications.",
author = "Fleming, {Jeremy T.} and Giuffrida, {Michelle A.} and Culp, {William T.N.} and Runge, {Jeffrey J.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/vsu.13345",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Veterinary Surgery",
issn = "0161-3499",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A survey of criteria used to evaluate applications for small animal surgery residency positions

AU - Fleming, Jeremy T.

AU - Giuffrida, Michelle A.

AU - Culp, William T.N.

AU - Runge, Jeffrey J.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objective: To determine attributes of applicants to small animal surgery residency programs (SRP) that are considered important, favorable, or detrimental according to surgeons at SRP registered with the American College of Veterinary Surgeons (ACVS). Study design: Online survey. Sample population: Residency-trained surgeons at ACVS-registered SRP. Methods: An online survey was advertised to eligible surgeons. Respondents anonymously provided information about their professional backgrounds and SRP interview practices and rated candidate attributes in terms of importance during application screening and favorable or detrimental effects during selection or ranking. Responses were compared by respondent practice setting and sex. Results: Surveys were completed by 148 of 289 (51%) invited surgeons. Male and female surgeons were equally represented, and 61% worked in academia. Most respondents’ SRP offered in-person interviews, typically to a select applicant group from whom residents were ultimately chosen. Letters of recommendation were the most influential factor in all phases of application review, particularly when respondents knew the writers. Other critical attributes were academic record, internship reputation, research activity, and indices of interpersonal skills. Nearly all respondents considered multiple prior unsuccessful applications detrimental. Academic respondents emphasized academic performance and academic internships; private practice respondents valued personal contact with applicants and surgical specialty internships. Responses did not differ by self-identified gender. Conclusion: Surgery residency program surgeons preferred first- or second-time applicants with excellent academic credentials, specific internship and research experiences, and letters of support from trusted colleagues as well as strong interpersonal skills. Clinical impact: Prospective residents can use this information to assess their candidacies, identify potential weaknesses, and prepare competitive applications.

AB - Objective: To determine attributes of applicants to small animal surgery residency programs (SRP) that are considered important, favorable, or detrimental according to surgeons at SRP registered with the American College of Veterinary Surgeons (ACVS). Study design: Online survey. Sample population: Residency-trained surgeons at ACVS-registered SRP. Methods: An online survey was advertised to eligible surgeons. Respondents anonymously provided information about their professional backgrounds and SRP interview practices and rated candidate attributes in terms of importance during application screening and favorable or detrimental effects during selection or ranking. Responses were compared by respondent practice setting and sex. Results: Surveys were completed by 148 of 289 (51%) invited surgeons. Male and female surgeons were equally represented, and 61% worked in academia. Most respondents’ SRP offered in-person interviews, typically to a select applicant group from whom residents were ultimately chosen. Letters of recommendation were the most influential factor in all phases of application review, particularly when respondents knew the writers. Other critical attributes were academic record, internship reputation, research activity, and indices of interpersonal skills. Nearly all respondents considered multiple prior unsuccessful applications detrimental. Academic respondents emphasized academic performance and academic internships; private practice respondents valued personal contact with applicants and surgical specialty internships. Responses did not differ by self-identified gender. Conclusion: Surgery residency program surgeons preferred first- or second-time applicants with excellent academic credentials, specific internship and research experiences, and letters of support from trusted colleagues as well as strong interpersonal skills. Clinical impact: Prospective residents can use this information to assess their candidacies, identify potential weaknesses, and prepare competitive applications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075431768&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075431768&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/vsu.13345

DO - 10.1111/vsu.13345

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85075431768

JO - Veterinary Surgery

JF - Veterinary Surgery

SN - 0161-3499

ER -