A study of lesion contrast recovery for statistical PET image reconstruction with accurate system models

Ching Han L Hsu, Jinyi Qi

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Iterative methods for the reconstruction of PET images can produce results superior to filtered backprojection since they are able to explicitly model the Poisson statistics of photon pair coincidence detection. However, many implementations of these methods use simple forward and backward projection schemes based either on linear interpolation or on computing the volume of intersection of detection tubes with each voxel. Other important physical system factors, such as depth dependent geometric sensitivity and spatially variant detector pair resolution are often ignored. In this paper, we examine the effect of a more accurate system model on algorithm performance. A second factor that limits the performance of the iterative algorithms is the chosen objective function and the manner in which it is optimized. Here we compare performance of filtered backprojection (FBP) with the OSEM (ordered subsets EM) algorithm, which approximately maximizes the likelihood, and a MAP (maximum a posteriori) method using a Gibbs prior with convex potential functions. Using the contrast recovery coefficient (CRC) as a performance measure, we performed various phantom experiments to investigate how the choice of algorithm and projection matrix affect reconstruction accuracy. Plots of CRC versus background variance were generated by varying cut-off frequency in FBP, subset size and iteration number or post-smoothing kernel in OSEM, and smoothing parameter in the MAP reconstructions. The results of these studies show that all of the iterative methods tested produce superior CRCs than FBP at matched background variance. However, there is also considerable variation in performance within the class of statistical methods depending on the choice of projection matrix and reconstruction algorithm.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
Pages437-446
Number of pages10
Volume3338
DOIs
StatePublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes
EventMedical Imaging 1998: Image Processing - San Diego, CA, United States
Duration: Feb 23 1998Feb 23 1998

Other

OtherMedical Imaging 1998: Image Processing
CountryUnited States
CitySan Diego, CA
Period2/23/982/23/98

Fingerprint

Filtered Backprojection
Image Reconstruction
image reconstruction
Image reconstruction
lesions
Recovery
recovery
Projection Matrix
Maximum a Posteriori
set theory
Iteration
projection
Subset
Iterative methods
smoothing
Kernel Smoothing
Linear Interpolation
Smoothing Parameter
Voxel
Reconstruction Algorithm

Keywords

  • Bayesian PET reconstruction
  • Contrast recovery coefficient
  • Lesion detectability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Condensed Matter Physics

Cite this

Hsu, C. H. L., & Qi, J. (1998). A study of lesion contrast recovery for statistical PET image reconstruction with accurate system models. In Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering (Vol. 3338, pp. 437-446) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.310922

A study of lesion contrast recovery for statistical PET image reconstruction with accurate system models. / Hsu, Ching Han L; Qi, Jinyi.

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. Vol. 3338 1998. p. 437-446.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Hsu, CHL & Qi, J 1998, A study of lesion contrast recovery for statistical PET image reconstruction with accurate system models. in Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. vol. 3338, pp. 437-446, Medical Imaging 1998: Image Processing, San Diego, CA, United States, 2/23/98. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.310922
Hsu CHL, Qi J. A study of lesion contrast recovery for statistical PET image reconstruction with accurate system models. In Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. Vol. 3338. 1998. p. 437-446 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.310922
Hsu, Ching Han L ; Qi, Jinyi. / A study of lesion contrast recovery for statistical PET image reconstruction with accurate system models. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. Vol. 3338 1998. pp. 437-446
@inproceedings{9a47326cadc6469ca9349c13ad305a77,
title = "A study of lesion contrast recovery for statistical PET image reconstruction with accurate system models",
abstract = "Iterative methods for the reconstruction of PET images can produce results superior to filtered backprojection since they are able to explicitly model the Poisson statistics of photon pair coincidence detection. However, many implementations of these methods use simple forward and backward projection schemes based either on linear interpolation or on computing the volume of intersection of detection tubes with each voxel. Other important physical system factors, such as depth dependent geometric sensitivity and spatially variant detector pair resolution are often ignored. In this paper, we examine the effect of a more accurate system model on algorithm performance. A second factor that limits the performance of the iterative algorithms is the chosen objective function and the manner in which it is optimized. Here we compare performance of filtered backprojection (FBP) with the OSEM (ordered subsets EM) algorithm, which approximately maximizes the likelihood, and a MAP (maximum a posteriori) method using a Gibbs prior with convex potential functions. Using the contrast recovery coefficient (CRC) as a performance measure, we performed various phantom experiments to investigate how the choice of algorithm and projection matrix affect reconstruction accuracy. Plots of CRC versus background variance were generated by varying cut-off frequency in FBP, subset size and iteration number or post-smoothing kernel in OSEM, and smoothing parameter in the MAP reconstructions. The results of these studies show that all of the iterative methods tested produce superior CRCs than FBP at matched background variance. However, there is also considerable variation in performance within the class of statistical methods depending on the choice of projection matrix and reconstruction algorithm.",
keywords = "Bayesian PET reconstruction, Contrast recovery coefficient, Lesion detectability",
author = "Hsu, {Ching Han L} and Jinyi Qi",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.1117/12.310922",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3338",
pages = "437--446",
booktitle = "Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - A study of lesion contrast recovery for statistical PET image reconstruction with accurate system models

AU - Hsu, Ching Han L

AU - Qi, Jinyi

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Iterative methods for the reconstruction of PET images can produce results superior to filtered backprojection since they are able to explicitly model the Poisson statistics of photon pair coincidence detection. However, many implementations of these methods use simple forward and backward projection schemes based either on linear interpolation or on computing the volume of intersection of detection tubes with each voxel. Other important physical system factors, such as depth dependent geometric sensitivity and spatially variant detector pair resolution are often ignored. In this paper, we examine the effect of a more accurate system model on algorithm performance. A second factor that limits the performance of the iterative algorithms is the chosen objective function and the manner in which it is optimized. Here we compare performance of filtered backprojection (FBP) with the OSEM (ordered subsets EM) algorithm, which approximately maximizes the likelihood, and a MAP (maximum a posteriori) method using a Gibbs prior with convex potential functions. Using the contrast recovery coefficient (CRC) as a performance measure, we performed various phantom experiments to investigate how the choice of algorithm and projection matrix affect reconstruction accuracy. Plots of CRC versus background variance were generated by varying cut-off frequency in FBP, subset size and iteration number or post-smoothing kernel in OSEM, and smoothing parameter in the MAP reconstructions. The results of these studies show that all of the iterative methods tested produce superior CRCs than FBP at matched background variance. However, there is also considerable variation in performance within the class of statistical methods depending on the choice of projection matrix and reconstruction algorithm.

AB - Iterative methods for the reconstruction of PET images can produce results superior to filtered backprojection since they are able to explicitly model the Poisson statistics of photon pair coincidence detection. However, many implementations of these methods use simple forward and backward projection schemes based either on linear interpolation or on computing the volume of intersection of detection tubes with each voxel. Other important physical system factors, such as depth dependent geometric sensitivity and spatially variant detector pair resolution are often ignored. In this paper, we examine the effect of a more accurate system model on algorithm performance. A second factor that limits the performance of the iterative algorithms is the chosen objective function and the manner in which it is optimized. Here we compare performance of filtered backprojection (FBP) with the OSEM (ordered subsets EM) algorithm, which approximately maximizes the likelihood, and a MAP (maximum a posteriori) method using a Gibbs prior with convex potential functions. Using the contrast recovery coefficient (CRC) as a performance measure, we performed various phantom experiments to investigate how the choice of algorithm and projection matrix affect reconstruction accuracy. Plots of CRC versus background variance were generated by varying cut-off frequency in FBP, subset size and iteration number or post-smoothing kernel in OSEM, and smoothing parameter in the MAP reconstructions. The results of these studies show that all of the iterative methods tested produce superior CRCs than FBP at matched background variance. However, there is also considerable variation in performance within the class of statistical methods depending on the choice of projection matrix and reconstruction algorithm.

KW - Bayesian PET reconstruction

KW - Contrast recovery coefficient

KW - Lesion detectability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=60849094826&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=60849094826&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1117/12.310922

DO - 10.1117/12.310922

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 3338

SP - 437

EP - 446

BT - Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

ER -