A review of the current status of pericardial closure following cardiac surgery

Walter D Boyd, John V. Tyberg, James L. Cox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Some cardiac surgeons prefer to close the pericardium whenever possible following surgery, others specifically avoid this practice, and still others believe that neither alternative has any meaningful influence on clinical outcomes. Unfortunately, scientific evidence supporting either approach is scarce, making a consensus regarding best practice impossible. In this article, the known functions of the native intact pericardium are summarized, and the arguments for and against pericardial closure after surgery are examined. In addition, the techniques and materials that have been utilized for pericardial closure previously, as well as those that are currently being developed, are assessed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1109-1118
Number of pages10
JournalExpert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy
Volume10
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

Pericardium
Thoracic Surgery
Practice Guidelines
Surgeons

Keywords

  • biomaterials
  • cardiac surgery
  • extracellular matrix
  • pericardial closure
  • pericardial substitutes
  • pericardiotomy
  • pericardium
  • postoperative atrial fibrillation
  • resternotomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

A review of the current status of pericardial closure following cardiac surgery. / Boyd, Walter D; Tyberg, John V.; Cox, James L.

In: Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy, Vol. 10, No. 9, 09.2012, p. 1109-1118.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5103b77817a74252a412af387f9a8e22,
title = "A review of the current status of pericardial closure following cardiac surgery",
abstract = "Some cardiac surgeons prefer to close the pericardium whenever possible following surgery, others specifically avoid this practice, and still others believe that neither alternative has any meaningful influence on clinical outcomes. Unfortunately, scientific evidence supporting either approach is scarce, making a consensus regarding best practice impossible. In this article, the known functions of the native intact pericardium are summarized, and the arguments for and against pericardial closure after surgery are examined. In addition, the techniques and materials that have been utilized for pericardial closure previously, as well as those that are currently being developed, are assessed.",
keywords = "biomaterials, cardiac surgery, extracellular matrix, pericardial closure, pericardial substitutes, pericardiotomy, pericardium, postoperative atrial fibrillation, resternotomy",
author = "Boyd, {Walter D} and Tyberg, {John V.} and Cox, {James L.}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1586/erc.12.87",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "1109--1118",
journal = "Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy",
issn = "1477-9072",
publisher = "Expert Reviews Ltd.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A review of the current status of pericardial closure following cardiac surgery

AU - Boyd, Walter D

AU - Tyberg, John V.

AU - Cox, James L.

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - Some cardiac surgeons prefer to close the pericardium whenever possible following surgery, others specifically avoid this practice, and still others believe that neither alternative has any meaningful influence on clinical outcomes. Unfortunately, scientific evidence supporting either approach is scarce, making a consensus regarding best practice impossible. In this article, the known functions of the native intact pericardium are summarized, and the arguments for and against pericardial closure after surgery are examined. In addition, the techniques and materials that have been utilized for pericardial closure previously, as well as those that are currently being developed, are assessed.

AB - Some cardiac surgeons prefer to close the pericardium whenever possible following surgery, others specifically avoid this practice, and still others believe that neither alternative has any meaningful influence on clinical outcomes. Unfortunately, scientific evidence supporting either approach is scarce, making a consensus regarding best practice impossible. In this article, the known functions of the native intact pericardium are summarized, and the arguments for and against pericardial closure after surgery are examined. In addition, the techniques and materials that have been utilized for pericardial closure previously, as well as those that are currently being developed, are assessed.

KW - biomaterials

KW - cardiac surgery

KW - extracellular matrix

KW - pericardial closure

KW - pericardial substitutes

KW - pericardiotomy

KW - pericardium

KW - postoperative atrial fibrillation

KW - resternotomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867921117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867921117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1586/erc.12.87

DO - 10.1586/erc.12.87

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 1109

EP - 1118

JO - Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy

JF - Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy

SN - 1477-9072

IS - 9

ER -