A reproducible approach to the reporting of organochlorine compounds in epidemiologic studies

Eric J. Willman, Irva Hertz-Picciotto, Jean A. Keller, Eugenio Martinez, M. Judith Charles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A growing body of research indicates that the most biologically active PCB congeners and organochlorines are not the most abundant components in human and wildlife samples. As researchers attempt measurement on a wider pool of less abundant compounds, they inevitably face quantification problems. To address this problem and enhance comparability across studies, we propose a standardized approach to report organochlorines that is based on a reproducible method to determine the limit of quantification (L Q). Two statistical methods are incorporated into our approach, one by Gibbons termed the Alternative Minimum Level (AML), and one based on determining a region of stable relativestandard deviation in instrument response (RSD). We illustrate our approach using historical samples collected during the 1960s from a cohort of pregnant women enrolled in the Child Health and Development Study. The results are applicable to determining the L Q of any method, and are of utmost importance to environmental scientists conducting trace organic analyses of complex mixtures. Our results demonstrate that: (1) precision as measured by RSD is the most important criterion in determining L Q; (2) the AML routinely isolates a region of constant RSD; and (3) the precision of the instrument detector response as measured with pure standards locates the L Q applicable for real samples - that is, the true limits of quantification reside in the detector, not the matrix effects or analyte recoveries associated with real samples. A corollary of these findings is that bias due to matrix effects and analyte recoveries can be assessed separately from precision and L Q determination. Previous approaches involved spiking matrix blanks to determine L Q, a problematic strategy for real world, complex matrices. We have now validated the use of pure standards in L Q determination, an approach that is practical and accessible to most analysts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1395-1402
Number of pages8
JournalChemosphere
Volume44
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Chlorinated Hydrocarbons
Epidemiologic Studies
matrix
Hylobates
organochlorine
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
Child Development
Detectors
Complex Mixtures
Recovery
Pregnant Women
child development
Polychlorinated biphenyls
child health
Research Personnel
Statistical methods
Health
PCB
Research
organochlorine compound

Keywords

  • DDE
  • DDT
  • Heptachlor epoxide
  • Limit of quantification
  • Limit of quantitation
  • Organochlorines
  • PCBs
  • Polychlorinated biphenyls

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

A reproducible approach to the reporting of organochlorine compounds in epidemiologic studies. / Willman, Eric J.; Hertz-Picciotto, Irva; Keller, Jean A.; Martinez, Eugenio; Judith Charles, M.

In: Chemosphere, Vol. 44, No. 6, 2001, p. 1395-1402.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Willman, Eric J. ; Hertz-Picciotto, Irva ; Keller, Jean A. ; Martinez, Eugenio ; Judith Charles, M. / A reproducible approach to the reporting of organochlorine compounds in epidemiologic studies. In: Chemosphere. 2001 ; Vol. 44, No. 6. pp. 1395-1402.
@article{74ea8c2df4104789ae1fa9aa424e96e4,
title = "A reproducible approach to the reporting of organochlorine compounds in epidemiologic studies",
abstract = "A growing body of research indicates that the most biologically active PCB congeners and organochlorines are not the most abundant components in human and wildlife samples. As researchers attempt measurement on a wider pool of less abundant compounds, they inevitably face quantification problems. To address this problem and enhance comparability across studies, we propose a standardized approach to report organochlorines that is based on a reproducible method to determine the limit of quantification (L Q). Two statistical methods are incorporated into our approach, one by Gibbons termed the Alternative Minimum Level (AML), and one based on determining a region of stable relativestandard deviation in instrument response (RSD). We illustrate our approach using historical samples collected during the 1960s from a cohort of pregnant women enrolled in the Child Health and Development Study. The results are applicable to determining the L Q of any method, and are of utmost importance to environmental scientists conducting trace organic analyses of complex mixtures. Our results demonstrate that: (1) precision as measured by RSD is the most important criterion in determining L Q; (2) the AML routinely isolates a region of constant RSD; and (3) the precision of the instrument detector response as measured with pure standards locates the L Q applicable for real samples - that is, the true limits of quantification reside in the detector, not the matrix effects or analyte recoveries associated with real samples. A corollary of these findings is that bias due to matrix effects and analyte recoveries can be assessed separately from precision and L Q determination. Previous approaches involved spiking matrix blanks to determine L Q, a problematic strategy for real world, complex matrices. We have now validated the use of pure standards in L Q determination, an approach that is practical and accessible to most analysts.",
keywords = "DDE, DDT, Heptachlor epoxide, Limit of quantification, Limit of quantitation, Organochlorines, PCBs, Polychlorinated biphenyls",
author = "Willman, {Eric J.} and Irva Hertz-Picciotto and Keller, {Jean A.} and Eugenio Martinez and {Judith Charles}, M.",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00465-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "1395--1402",
journal = "Chemosphere",
issn = "0045-6535",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A reproducible approach to the reporting of organochlorine compounds in epidemiologic studies

AU - Willman, Eric J.

AU - Hertz-Picciotto, Irva

AU - Keller, Jean A.

AU - Martinez, Eugenio

AU - Judith Charles, M.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - A growing body of research indicates that the most biologically active PCB congeners and organochlorines are not the most abundant components in human and wildlife samples. As researchers attempt measurement on a wider pool of less abundant compounds, they inevitably face quantification problems. To address this problem and enhance comparability across studies, we propose a standardized approach to report organochlorines that is based on a reproducible method to determine the limit of quantification (L Q). Two statistical methods are incorporated into our approach, one by Gibbons termed the Alternative Minimum Level (AML), and one based on determining a region of stable relativestandard deviation in instrument response (RSD). We illustrate our approach using historical samples collected during the 1960s from a cohort of pregnant women enrolled in the Child Health and Development Study. The results are applicable to determining the L Q of any method, and are of utmost importance to environmental scientists conducting trace organic analyses of complex mixtures. Our results demonstrate that: (1) precision as measured by RSD is the most important criterion in determining L Q; (2) the AML routinely isolates a region of constant RSD; and (3) the precision of the instrument detector response as measured with pure standards locates the L Q applicable for real samples - that is, the true limits of quantification reside in the detector, not the matrix effects or analyte recoveries associated with real samples. A corollary of these findings is that bias due to matrix effects and analyte recoveries can be assessed separately from precision and L Q determination. Previous approaches involved spiking matrix blanks to determine L Q, a problematic strategy for real world, complex matrices. We have now validated the use of pure standards in L Q determination, an approach that is practical and accessible to most analysts.

AB - A growing body of research indicates that the most biologically active PCB congeners and organochlorines are not the most abundant components in human and wildlife samples. As researchers attempt measurement on a wider pool of less abundant compounds, they inevitably face quantification problems. To address this problem and enhance comparability across studies, we propose a standardized approach to report organochlorines that is based on a reproducible method to determine the limit of quantification (L Q). Two statistical methods are incorporated into our approach, one by Gibbons termed the Alternative Minimum Level (AML), and one based on determining a region of stable relativestandard deviation in instrument response (RSD). We illustrate our approach using historical samples collected during the 1960s from a cohort of pregnant women enrolled in the Child Health and Development Study. The results are applicable to determining the L Q of any method, and are of utmost importance to environmental scientists conducting trace organic analyses of complex mixtures. Our results demonstrate that: (1) precision as measured by RSD is the most important criterion in determining L Q; (2) the AML routinely isolates a region of constant RSD; and (3) the precision of the instrument detector response as measured with pure standards locates the L Q applicable for real samples - that is, the true limits of quantification reside in the detector, not the matrix effects or analyte recoveries associated with real samples. A corollary of these findings is that bias due to matrix effects and analyte recoveries can be assessed separately from precision and L Q determination. Previous approaches involved spiking matrix blanks to determine L Q, a problematic strategy for real world, complex matrices. We have now validated the use of pure standards in L Q determination, an approach that is practical and accessible to most analysts.

KW - DDE

KW - DDT

KW - Heptachlor epoxide

KW - Limit of quantification

KW - Limit of quantitation

KW - Organochlorines

KW - PCBs

KW - Polychlorinated biphenyls

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034884449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034884449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00465-3

DO - 10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00465-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 11513118

AN - SCOPUS:0034884449

VL - 44

SP - 1395

EP - 1402

JO - Chemosphere

JF - Chemosphere

SN - 0045-6535

IS - 6

ER -