A Prospective Randomized Blister Prevention Trial Assessing Paper Tape in Endurance Distances (Pre-TAPED)

Grant S. Lipman, Mark A. Ellis, Erica J. Lewis, Brandee L Waite, John Lissoway, Garrett K. Chan, Brian J. Krabak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective Friction foot blisters are a common injury occurring in up to 39% of marathoners, the most common injury in adventure racing, and represent more than 70% of medical visits in multi-stage ultramarathons. The goal of the study was to determine whether paper tape could prevent foot blisters in ultramarathon runners. Methods This prospective randomized trial was undertaken during RacingThePlanet 155-mile (250-km), 7-day self-supported ultramarathons in China, Australia, Egypt, Chile, and Nepal in 2010 and 2011. Paper tape was applied prerace to one randomly selected foot, with the untreated foot acting as the own control. The study end point was development of a hot spot or blister on any location of either foot. Results One hundred thirty-six participants were enrolled with 90 (66%) having completed data for analysis. There were 36% women, with a mean age of 40 ± 9.4 years (range, 25–40 years) and pack weight of 11 ± 1.8 kg (range, 8–16 kg). All participants developed blisters, with 89% occurring by day 2 and 59% located on the toes. No protective effect was observed by the intervention (47 versus 35; 52% versus 39%; P =.22), with fewer blisters occurring around the tape on the experimental foot than under the tape (23 vs 31; 25.6% versus 34.4%), yet 84% of study participants when queried would choose paper tape for blister prevention in the future. Conclusions Although paper tape was not found to be significantly protective against blisters, the intervention was well tolerated with high user satisfaction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)457-461
Number of pages5
JournalWilderness and Environmental Medicine
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014

Fingerprint

Blister
Foot
Nepal
Friction
Egypt
Chile
Wounds and Injuries
Toes
China
Weights and Measures

Keywords

  • blisters
  • feet
  • multistage
  • paper tape
  • prevention
  • ultramarathon

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

A Prospective Randomized Blister Prevention Trial Assessing Paper Tape in Endurance Distances (Pre-TAPED). / Lipman, Grant S.; Ellis, Mark A.; Lewis, Erica J.; Waite, Brandee L; Lissoway, John; Chan, Garrett K.; Krabak, Brian J.

In: Wilderness and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 25, No. 4, 01.12.2014, p. 457-461.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lipman, Grant S. ; Ellis, Mark A. ; Lewis, Erica J. ; Waite, Brandee L ; Lissoway, John ; Chan, Garrett K. ; Krabak, Brian J. / A Prospective Randomized Blister Prevention Trial Assessing Paper Tape in Endurance Distances (Pre-TAPED). In: Wilderness and Environmental Medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 25, No. 4. pp. 457-461.
@article{bf6250c93d114096a1f1446aad95eb03,
title = "A Prospective Randomized Blister Prevention Trial Assessing Paper Tape in Endurance Distances (Pre-TAPED)",
abstract = "Objective Friction foot blisters are a common injury occurring in up to 39{\%} of marathoners, the most common injury in adventure racing, and represent more than 70{\%} of medical visits in multi-stage ultramarathons. The goal of the study was to determine whether paper tape could prevent foot blisters in ultramarathon runners. Methods This prospective randomized trial was undertaken during RacingThePlanet 155-mile (250-km), 7-day self-supported ultramarathons in China, Australia, Egypt, Chile, and Nepal in 2010 and 2011. Paper tape was applied prerace to one randomly selected foot, with the untreated foot acting as the own control. The study end point was development of a hot spot or blister on any location of either foot. Results One hundred thirty-six participants were enrolled with 90 (66{\%}) having completed data for analysis. There were 36{\%} women, with a mean age of 40 ± 9.4 years (range, 25–40 years) and pack weight of 11 ± 1.8 kg (range, 8–16 kg). All participants developed blisters, with 89{\%} occurring by day 2 and 59{\%} located on the toes. No protective effect was observed by the intervention (47 versus 35; 52{\%} versus 39{\%}; P =.22), with fewer blisters occurring around the tape on the experimental foot than under the tape (23 vs 31; 25.6{\%} versus 34.4{\%}), yet 84{\%} of study participants when queried would choose paper tape for blister prevention in the future. Conclusions Although paper tape was not found to be significantly protective against blisters, the intervention was well tolerated with high user satisfaction.",
keywords = "blisters, feet, multistage, paper tape, prevention, ultramarathon",
author = "Lipman, {Grant S.} and Ellis, {Mark A.} and Lewis, {Erica J.} and Waite, {Brandee L} and John Lissoway and Chan, {Garrett K.} and Krabak, {Brian J.}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.wem.2014.06.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "457--461",
journal = "Wilderness and Environmental Medicine",
issn = "1080-6032",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Prospective Randomized Blister Prevention Trial Assessing Paper Tape in Endurance Distances (Pre-TAPED)

AU - Lipman, Grant S.

AU - Ellis, Mark A.

AU - Lewis, Erica J.

AU - Waite, Brandee L

AU - Lissoway, John

AU - Chan, Garrett K.

AU - Krabak, Brian J.

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - Objective Friction foot blisters are a common injury occurring in up to 39% of marathoners, the most common injury in adventure racing, and represent more than 70% of medical visits in multi-stage ultramarathons. The goal of the study was to determine whether paper tape could prevent foot blisters in ultramarathon runners. Methods This prospective randomized trial was undertaken during RacingThePlanet 155-mile (250-km), 7-day self-supported ultramarathons in China, Australia, Egypt, Chile, and Nepal in 2010 and 2011. Paper tape was applied prerace to one randomly selected foot, with the untreated foot acting as the own control. The study end point was development of a hot spot or blister on any location of either foot. Results One hundred thirty-six participants were enrolled with 90 (66%) having completed data for analysis. There were 36% women, with a mean age of 40 ± 9.4 years (range, 25–40 years) and pack weight of 11 ± 1.8 kg (range, 8–16 kg). All participants developed blisters, with 89% occurring by day 2 and 59% located on the toes. No protective effect was observed by the intervention (47 versus 35; 52% versus 39%; P =.22), with fewer blisters occurring around the tape on the experimental foot than under the tape (23 vs 31; 25.6% versus 34.4%), yet 84% of study participants when queried would choose paper tape for blister prevention in the future. Conclusions Although paper tape was not found to be significantly protective against blisters, the intervention was well tolerated with high user satisfaction.

AB - Objective Friction foot blisters are a common injury occurring in up to 39% of marathoners, the most common injury in adventure racing, and represent more than 70% of medical visits in multi-stage ultramarathons. The goal of the study was to determine whether paper tape could prevent foot blisters in ultramarathon runners. Methods This prospective randomized trial was undertaken during RacingThePlanet 155-mile (250-km), 7-day self-supported ultramarathons in China, Australia, Egypt, Chile, and Nepal in 2010 and 2011. Paper tape was applied prerace to one randomly selected foot, with the untreated foot acting as the own control. The study end point was development of a hot spot or blister on any location of either foot. Results One hundred thirty-six participants were enrolled with 90 (66%) having completed data for analysis. There were 36% women, with a mean age of 40 ± 9.4 years (range, 25–40 years) and pack weight of 11 ± 1.8 kg (range, 8–16 kg). All participants developed blisters, with 89% occurring by day 2 and 59% located on the toes. No protective effect was observed by the intervention (47 versus 35; 52% versus 39%; P =.22), with fewer blisters occurring around the tape on the experimental foot than under the tape (23 vs 31; 25.6% versus 34.4%), yet 84% of study participants when queried would choose paper tape for blister prevention in the future. Conclusions Although paper tape was not found to be significantly protective against blisters, the intervention was well tolerated with high user satisfaction.

KW - blisters

KW - feet

KW - multistage

KW - paper tape

KW - prevention

KW - ultramarathon

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930180260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930180260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.wem.2014.06.013

DO - 10.1016/j.wem.2014.06.013

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 457

EP - 461

JO - Wilderness and Environmental Medicine

JF - Wilderness and Environmental Medicine

SN - 1080-6032

IS - 4

ER -