A pretest procedure reliably predicts performance in two animal models of inescapable stress

Robert C. Drugan, Phil Skolnick, Steven M. Paul, Jacqueline Crawley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rats exposed to inescapable tailshock fail to learn a shuttle-escape task 24 hours later, an effect referred to as "learned helplessness." However, within most rat strains only 10-50% of the animals tested develop this syndrome. In the present study a significant correlation was found between rats that displayed learned helplessness on the first test and those that displayed learned helplessness on a second test performed either 2 weeks (r=.80, p<0.001) or 4 weeks (r=.74, p<0.001) later. An analysis of the mean session latency of the shuttlebox task in these two tests suggested a bimodal distribution of animals that failed and learned. A significant correlation was found between individual rats that learned this task on the first test and those which learned this task 2 or 4 weeks later. Similarly, in the "behavioral despair" test, a significant correlation was observed for floating time for individual rats on the first test and on the second test either 2 (r=.72, p<0.001) or 4 weeks (r=.63, p<0.001) later. However, for the forced-swim test, a unimodal and rather graded response was observed across individual subjects. Thus, performance on the first round predicted performance on the second round in both models. When rats experienced the learned helplessness paradigm on round 1 and the behavioral despair paradigm in round 2, there was no correlation between rats that displayed helplessness following inescapable tailshock and the rats that demonstrated "behavioral despair" on a later test. While both the "learned helplessness" and the "behavioral despair" models may assess the ability of individual animals to "cope" with stressors, the lack of cross-predictability strongly suggests that the two models may be mediated by different neurochenical mechanisms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)649-654
Number of pages6
JournalPharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Learned Helplessness
Rats
Animals
Animal Models
Animal Distribution
Aptitude

Keywords

  • Anxiety
  • Depression
  • Forced-swin test
  • Learned helplessness
  • Stress

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology

Cite this

A pretest procedure reliably predicts performance in two animal models of inescapable stress. / Drugan, Robert C.; Skolnick, Phil; Paul, Steven M.; Crawley, Jacqueline.

In: Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, Vol. 33, No. 3, 1989, p. 649-654.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ee8041a304c84ec39fb3e6f52892c914,
title = "A pretest procedure reliably predicts performance in two animal models of inescapable stress",
abstract = "Rats exposed to inescapable tailshock fail to learn a shuttle-escape task 24 hours later, an effect referred to as {"}learned helplessness.{"} However, within most rat strains only 10-50{\%} of the animals tested develop this syndrome. In the present study a significant correlation was found between rats that displayed learned helplessness on the first test and those that displayed learned helplessness on a second test performed either 2 weeks (r=.80, p<0.001) or 4 weeks (r=.74, p<0.001) later. An analysis of the mean session latency of the shuttlebox task in these two tests suggested a bimodal distribution of animals that failed and learned. A significant correlation was found between individual rats that learned this task on the first test and those which learned this task 2 or 4 weeks later. Similarly, in the {"}behavioral despair{"} test, a significant correlation was observed for floating time for individual rats on the first test and on the second test either 2 (r=.72, p<0.001) or 4 weeks (r=.63, p<0.001) later. However, for the forced-swim test, a unimodal and rather graded response was observed across individual subjects. Thus, performance on the first round predicted performance on the second round in both models. When rats experienced the learned helplessness paradigm on round 1 and the behavioral despair paradigm in round 2, there was no correlation between rats that displayed helplessness following inescapable tailshock and the rats that demonstrated {"}behavioral despair{"} on a later test. While both the {"}learned helplessness{"} and the {"}behavioral despair{"} models may assess the ability of individual animals to {"}cope{"} with stressors, the lack of cross-predictability strongly suggests that the two models may be mediated by different neurochenical mechanisms.",
keywords = "Anxiety, Depression, Forced-swin test, Learned helplessness, Stress",
author = "Drugan, {Robert C.} and Phil Skolnick and Paul, {Steven M.} and Jacqueline Crawley",
year = "1989",
doi = "10.1016/0091-3057(89)90403-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "649--654",
journal = "Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior",
issn = "0091-3057",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A pretest procedure reliably predicts performance in two animal models of inescapable stress

AU - Drugan, Robert C.

AU - Skolnick, Phil

AU - Paul, Steven M.

AU - Crawley, Jacqueline

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - Rats exposed to inescapable tailshock fail to learn a shuttle-escape task 24 hours later, an effect referred to as "learned helplessness." However, within most rat strains only 10-50% of the animals tested develop this syndrome. In the present study a significant correlation was found between rats that displayed learned helplessness on the first test and those that displayed learned helplessness on a second test performed either 2 weeks (r=.80, p<0.001) or 4 weeks (r=.74, p<0.001) later. An analysis of the mean session latency of the shuttlebox task in these two tests suggested a bimodal distribution of animals that failed and learned. A significant correlation was found between individual rats that learned this task on the first test and those which learned this task 2 or 4 weeks later. Similarly, in the "behavioral despair" test, a significant correlation was observed for floating time for individual rats on the first test and on the second test either 2 (r=.72, p<0.001) or 4 weeks (r=.63, p<0.001) later. However, for the forced-swim test, a unimodal and rather graded response was observed across individual subjects. Thus, performance on the first round predicted performance on the second round in both models. When rats experienced the learned helplessness paradigm on round 1 and the behavioral despair paradigm in round 2, there was no correlation between rats that displayed helplessness following inescapable tailshock and the rats that demonstrated "behavioral despair" on a later test. While both the "learned helplessness" and the "behavioral despair" models may assess the ability of individual animals to "cope" with stressors, the lack of cross-predictability strongly suggests that the two models may be mediated by different neurochenical mechanisms.

AB - Rats exposed to inescapable tailshock fail to learn a shuttle-escape task 24 hours later, an effect referred to as "learned helplessness." However, within most rat strains only 10-50% of the animals tested develop this syndrome. In the present study a significant correlation was found between rats that displayed learned helplessness on the first test and those that displayed learned helplessness on a second test performed either 2 weeks (r=.80, p<0.001) or 4 weeks (r=.74, p<0.001) later. An analysis of the mean session latency of the shuttlebox task in these two tests suggested a bimodal distribution of animals that failed and learned. A significant correlation was found between individual rats that learned this task on the first test and those which learned this task 2 or 4 weeks later. Similarly, in the "behavioral despair" test, a significant correlation was observed for floating time for individual rats on the first test and on the second test either 2 (r=.72, p<0.001) or 4 weeks (r=.63, p<0.001) later. However, for the forced-swim test, a unimodal and rather graded response was observed across individual subjects. Thus, performance on the first round predicted performance on the second round in both models. When rats experienced the learned helplessness paradigm on round 1 and the behavioral despair paradigm in round 2, there was no correlation between rats that displayed helplessness following inescapable tailshock and the rats that demonstrated "behavioral despair" on a later test. While both the "learned helplessness" and the "behavioral despair" models may assess the ability of individual animals to "cope" with stressors, the lack of cross-predictability strongly suggests that the two models may be mediated by different neurochenical mechanisms.

KW - Anxiety

KW - Depression

KW - Forced-swin test

KW - Learned helplessness

KW - Stress

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024434993&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024434993&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0091-3057(89)90403-6

DO - 10.1016/0091-3057(89)90403-6

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 649

EP - 654

JO - Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

JF - Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

SN - 0091-3057

IS - 3

ER -