A practical method for collecting food record data in a prospective cohort study of breast cancer survivors

Marilyn L. Kwan, Lawrence H. Kushi, Jun Song, Allegra W. Timperi, Alanna M. Boynton, Karen M. Johnson, Judi Standley, Alan R. Kristal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Multiple-day diet records can be unsuitable for cohort studies because of high administrative and analytical costs. Costs could be reduced if a subsample of participants were analyzed in a nested case-control study. However, completed records are usually reviewed ("documented") with participants to correct errors and omissions before analysis. The authors evaluated the suitability of using undocumented 3-day food records in 2 samples of women in a Northern California cohort study of breast cancer survivorship (2006-2009). One group of participants (n = 130) received an introduction to the food record at enrollment, while another (n = 70) received more comprehensive instruction. Food records were mailed to participants 6 months later for follow-up and were analyzed as received and after phone documentation. Error rates for adequate completion were high in the first group but substantially lower among persons receiving instruction; prevalences of missing data on serving size and incomplete food descriptions changed from 30% to 4% and from 32% to 6%, respectively (P < 0.0001). Correlations between nutrient intakes calculated from undocumented and documented records were 0.72-0.93 in the first group and were significantly stronger (0.84-0.99) among persons receiving instruction. Documentation had little effect on intraclass correlation coefficients across days, but training increased the coefficients for many nutrients. When participants receive proper instruction, undocumented food records can be satisfactory for large epidemiologic studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1315-1323
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Epidemiology
Volume172
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Survivors
Cohort Studies
Prospective Studies
Breast Neoplasms
Food
Documentation
Serving Size
Diet Records
Costs and Cost Analysis
Case-Control Studies
Epidemiologic Studies
Survival Rate

Keywords

  • breast neoplasms
  • cohort studies
  • data collection
  • diet records
  • reproducibility of results

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Kwan, M. L., Kushi, L. H., Song, J., Timperi, A. W., Boynton, A. M., Johnson, K. M., ... Kristal, A. R. (2010). A practical method for collecting food record data in a prospective cohort study of breast cancer survivors. American Journal of Epidemiology, 172(11), 1315-1323. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq284

A practical method for collecting food record data in a prospective cohort study of breast cancer survivors. / Kwan, Marilyn L.; Kushi, Lawrence H.; Song, Jun; Timperi, Allegra W.; Boynton, Alanna M.; Johnson, Karen M.; Standley, Judi; Kristal, Alan R.

In: American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 172, No. 11, 01.12.2010, p. 1315-1323.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kwan, ML, Kushi, LH, Song, J, Timperi, AW, Boynton, AM, Johnson, KM, Standley, J & Kristal, AR 2010, 'A practical method for collecting food record data in a prospective cohort study of breast cancer survivors', American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 172, no. 11, pp. 1315-1323. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq284
Kwan, Marilyn L. ; Kushi, Lawrence H. ; Song, Jun ; Timperi, Allegra W. ; Boynton, Alanna M. ; Johnson, Karen M. ; Standley, Judi ; Kristal, Alan R. / A practical method for collecting food record data in a prospective cohort study of breast cancer survivors. In: American Journal of Epidemiology. 2010 ; Vol. 172, No. 11. pp. 1315-1323.
@article{9b753b5ae5ef4e4b8adc2b5645645794,
title = "A practical method for collecting food record data in a prospective cohort study of breast cancer survivors",
abstract = "Multiple-day diet records can be unsuitable for cohort studies because of high administrative and analytical costs. Costs could be reduced if a subsample of participants were analyzed in a nested case-control study. However, completed records are usually reviewed ({"}documented{"}) with participants to correct errors and omissions before analysis. The authors evaluated the suitability of using undocumented 3-day food records in 2 samples of women in a Northern California cohort study of breast cancer survivorship (2006-2009). One group of participants (n = 130) received an introduction to the food record at enrollment, while another (n = 70) received more comprehensive instruction. Food records were mailed to participants 6 months later for follow-up and were analyzed as received and after phone documentation. Error rates for adequate completion were high in the first group but substantially lower among persons receiving instruction; prevalences of missing data on serving size and incomplete food descriptions changed from 30{\%} to 4{\%} and from 32{\%} to 6{\%}, respectively (P < 0.0001). Correlations between nutrient intakes calculated from undocumented and documented records were 0.72-0.93 in the first group and were significantly stronger (0.84-0.99) among persons receiving instruction. Documentation had little effect on intraclass correlation coefficients across days, but training increased the coefficients for many nutrients. When participants receive proper instruction, undocumented food records can be satisfactory for large epidemiologic studies.",
keywords = "breast neoplasms, cohort studies, data collection, diet records, reproducibility of results",
author = "Kwan, {Marilyn L.} and Kushi, {Lawrence H.} and Jun Song and Timperi, {Allegra W.} and Boynton, {Alanna M.} and Johnson, {Karen M.} and Judi Standley and Kristal, {Alan R.}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/aje/kwq284",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "172",
pages = "1315--1323",
journal = "American Journal of Epidemiology",
issn = "0002-9262",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A practical method for collecting food record data in a prospective cohort study of breast cancer survivors

AU - Kwan, Marilyn L.

AU - Kushi, Lawrence H.

AU - Song, Jun

AU - Timperi, Allegra W.

AU - Boynton, Alanna M.

AU - Johnson, Karen M.

AU - Standley, Judi

AU - Kristal, Alan R.

PY - 2010/12/1

Y1 - 2010/12/1

N2 - Multiple-day diet records can be unsuitable for cohort studies because of high administrative and analytical costs. Costs could be reduced if a subsample of participants were analyzed in a nested case-control study. However, completed records are usually reviewed ("documented") with participants to correct errors and omissions before analysis. The authors evaluated the suitability of using undocumented 3-day food records in 2 samples of women in a Northern California cohort study of breast cancer survivorship (2006-2009). One group of participants (n = 130) received an introduction to the food record at enrollment, while another (n = 70) received more comprehensive instruction. Food records were mailed to participants 6 months later for follow-up and were analyzed as received and after phone documentation. Error rates for adequate completion were high in the first group but substantially lower among persons receiving instruction; prevalences of missing data on serving size and incomplete food descriptions changed from 30% to 4% and from 32% to 6%, respectively (P < 0.0001). Correlations between nutrient intakes calculated from undocumented and documented records were 0.72-0.93 in the first group and were significantly stronger (0.84-0.99) among persons receiving instruction. Documentation had little effect on intraclass correlation coefficients across days, but training increased the coefficients for many nutrients. When participants receive proper instruction, undocumented food records can be satisfactory for large epidemiologic studies.

AB - Multiple-day diet records can be unsuitable for cohort studies because of high administrative and analytical costs. Costs could be reduced if a subsample of participants were analyzed in a nested case-control study. However, completed records are usually reviewed ("documented") with participants to correct errors and omissions before analysis. The authors evaluated the suitability of using undocumented 3-day food records in 2 samples of women in a Northern California cohort study of breast cancer survivorship (2006-2009). One group of participants (n = 130) received an introduction to the food record at enrollment, while another (n = 70) received more comprehensive instruction. Food records were mailed to participants 6 months later for follow-up and were analyzed as received and after phone documentation. Error rates for adequate completion were high in the first group but substantially lower among persons receiving instruction; prevalences of missing data on serving size and incomplete food descriptions changed from 30% to 4% and from 32% to 6%, respectively (P < 0.0001). Correlations between nutrient intakes calculated from undocumented and documented records were 0.72-0.93 in the first group and were significantly stronger (0.84-0.99) among persons receiving instruction. Documentation had little effect on intraclass correlation coefficients across days, but training increased the coefficients for many nutrients. When participants receive proper instruction, undocumented food records can be satisfactory for large epidemiologic studies.

KW - breast neoplasms

KW - cohort studies

KW - data collection

KW - diet records

KW - reproducibility of results

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649678180&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649678180&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/aje/kwq284

DO - 10.1093/aje/kwq284

M3 - Article

C2 - 20937633

AN - SCOPUS:78649678180

VL - 172

SP - 1315

EP - 1323

JO - American Journal of Epidemiology

JF - American Journal of Epidemiology

SN - 0002-9262

IS - 11

ER -