A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: Combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy

Andrew W. Yen, Joseph Leung, Felix W. Leung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Water exchange provides salvage cleansing and improves adenoma detection, but drawbacks include prolonged procedure time. Cap-assisted colonoscopy decreases cecal intubation time but is limited by impaired views when feces lodge in the cap. Objective: To investigate the impact of combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy (WCC) on detection of adenomas and proximal colon serrated polyps. Design: Retrospective, single-center, single-colonoscopist, consecutive group observational study. Setting: Veterans Affairs outpatient endoscopy suite. Patients: Outpatients undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Intervention: WCC data collected from 100 consecutive patients were compared to a control group of 101 consecutive patients examined with conventional air insufflation colonoscopy during the prior 4-month period. Main Outcome Measurements: Adenoma detection rate (ADR), adenomas detected per colonoscopy, proximal colon serrated polyp detection rate, and proximal colon serrated polyps per colonoscopy rate. Results: Compared with controls, the WCC group had a higher polyp detection rate (93.0% vs 84.2%; P =.07), ADR (75.0% vs 59.4%; P =.02), proximal colon ADR (61.0% vs 47.5%; P =.07), proximal colon serrated polyp detection rate (24.0% vs 9.9%; P =.009), number of adenomas per colonoscopy (2.70 vs 1.50; P =.002), and mean number of proximal colon serrated polyps per colonoscopy (0.38 vs 0.12; P =.004). Limitations: Retrospective study; single, unblinded endoscopist. Conclusion: ADR and adenomas per colonoscopy are both sensitive indicators of colonoscopy quality. WCC merges two simple methods to improve the performance of screening and surveillance colonoscopy. The data suggest that larger, prospective studies are necessary to determine if there are differences between water-exchange combined with cap-assisted maneuvers and the individual components used alone in lesion detection in screening and surveillance colonoscopy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)944-948
Number of pages5
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume77
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2013

Fingerprint

Colonoscopy
Adenoma
Water
Polyps
Colon
Outpatients
Insufflation
Veterans
Intubation
Feces
Endoscopy
Observational Studies

Keywords

  • adenoma detection rate
  • ADR
  • water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy
  • WCC

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection : Combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy. / Yen, Andrew W.; Leung, Joseph; Leung, Felix W.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 77, No. 6, 06.2013, p. 944-948.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{59da602887614bde9a07741007857d8c,
title = "A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: Combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy",
abstract = "Background: Water exchange provides salvage cleansing and improves adenoma detection, but drawbacks include prolonged procedure time. Cap-assisted colonoscopy decreases cecal intubation time but is limited by impaired views when feces lodge in the cap. Objective: To investigate the impact of combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy (WCC) on detection of adenomas and proximal colon serrated polyps. Design: Retrospective, single-center, single-colonoscopist, consecutive group observational study. Setting: Veterans Affairs outpatient endoscopy suite. Patients: Outpatients undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Intervention: WCC data collected from 100 consecutive patients were compared to a control group of 101 consecutive patients examined with conventional air insufflation colonoscopy during the prior 4-month period. Main Outcome Measurements: Adenoma detection rate (ADR), adenomas detected per colonoscopy, proximal colon serrated polyp detection rate, and proximal colon serrated polyps per colonoscopy rate. Results: Compared with controls, the WCC group had a higher polyp detection rate (93.0{\%} vs 84.2{\%}; P =.07), ADR (75.0{\%} vs 59.4{\%}; P =.02), proximal colon ADR (61.0{\%} vs 47.5{\%}; P =.07), proximal colon serrated polyp detection rate (24.0{\%} vs 9.9{\%}; P =.009), number of adenomas per colonoscopy (2.70 vs 1.50; P =.002), and mean number of proximal colon serrated polyps per colonoscopy (0.38 vs 0.12; P =.004). Limitations: Retrospective study; single, unblinded endoscopist. Conclusion: ADR and adenomas per colonoscopy are both sensitive indicators of colonoscopy quality. WCC merges two simple methods to improve the performance of screening and surveillance colonoscopy. The data suggest that larger, prospective studies are necessary to determine if there are differences between water-exchange combined with cap-assisted maneuvers and the individual components used alone in lesion detection in screening and surveillance colonoscopy.",
keywords = "adenoma detection rate, ADR, water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy, WCC",
author = "Yen, {Andrew W.} and Joseph Leung and Leung, {Felix W.}",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "944--948",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection

T2 - Combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy

AU - Yen, Andrew W.

AU - Leung, Joseph

AU - Leung, Felix W.

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - Background: Water exchange provides salvage cleansing and improves adenoma detection, but drawbacks include prolonged procedure time. Cap-assisted colonoscopy decreases cecal intubation time but is limited by impaired views when feces lodge in the cap. Objective: To investigate the impact of combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy (WCC) on detection of adenomas and proximal colon serrated polyps. Design: Retrospective, single-center, single-colonoscopist, consecutive group observational study. Setting: Veterans Affairs outpatient endoscopy suite. Patients: Outpatients undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Intervention: WCC data collected from 100 consecutive patients were compared to a control group of 101 consecutive patients examined with conventional air insufflation colonoscopy during the prior 4-month period. Main Outcome Measurements: Adenoma detection rate (ADR), adenomas detected per colonoscopy, proximal colon serrated polyp detection rate, and proximal colon serrated polyps per colonoscopy rate. Results: Compared with controls, the WCC group had a higher polyp detection rate (93.0% vs 84.2%; P =.07), ADR (75.0% vs 59.4%; P =.02), proximal colon ADR (61.0% vs 47.5%; P =.07), proximal colon serrated polyp detection rate (24.0% vs 9.9%; P =.009), number of adenomas per colonoscopy (2.70 vs 1.50; P =.002), and mean number of proximal colon serrated polyps per colonoscopy (0.38 vs 0.12; P =.004). Limitations: Retrospective study; single, unblinded endoscopist. Conclusion: ADR and adenomas per colonoscopy are both sensitive indicators of colonoscopy quality. WCC merges two simple methods to improve the performance of screening and surveillance colonoscopy. The data suggest that larger, prospective studies are necessary to determine if there are differences between water-exchange combined with cap-assisted maneuvers and the individual components used alone in lesion detection in screening and surveillance colonoscopy.

AB - Background: Water exchange provides salvage cleansing and improves adenoma detection, but drawbacks include prolonged procedure time. Cap-assisted colonoscopy decreases cecal intubation time but is limited by impaired views when feces lodge in the cap. Objective: To investigate the impact of combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy (WCC) on detection of adenomas and proximal colon serrated polyps. Design: Retrospective, single-center, single-colonoscopist, consecutive group observational study. Setting: Veterans Affairs outpatient endoscopy suite. Patients: Outpatients undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Intervention: WCC data collected from 100 consecutive patients were compared to a control group of 101 consecutive patients examined with conventional air insufflation colonoscopy during the prior 4-month period. Main Outcome Measurements: Adenoma detection rate (ADR), adenomas detected per colonoscopy, proximal colon serrated polyp detection rate, and proximal colon serrated polyps per colonoscopy rate. Results: Compared with controls, the WCC group had a higher polyp detection rate (93.0% vs 84.2%; P =.07), ADR (75.0% vs 59.4%; P =.02), proximal colon ADR (61.0% vs 47.5%; P =.07), proximal colon serrated polyp detection rate (24.0% vs 9.9%; P =.009), number of adenomas per colonoscopy (2.70 vs 1.50; P =.002), and mean number of proximal colon serrated polyps per colonoscopy (0.38 vs 0.12; P =.004). Limitations: Retrospective study; single, unblinded endoscopist. Conclusion: ADR and adenomas per colonoscopy are both sensitive indicators of colonoscopy quality. WCC merges two simple methods to improve the performance of screening and surveillance colonoscopy. The data suggest that larger, prospective studies are necessary to determine if there are differences between water-exchange combined with cap-assisted maneuvers and the individual components used alone in lesion detection in screening and surveillance colonoscopy.

KW - adenoma detection rate

KW - ADR

KW - water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy

KW - WCC

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877924037&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877924037&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.011

DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 23473001

AN - SCOPUS:84877924037

VL - 77

SP - 944

EP - 948

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 6

ER -