A Multifaceted Intervention Improves Prescribing for Acute Respiratory Infection for Adults and Children in Emergency Department and Urgent Care Settings

Kabir Yadav, Daniella Meeker, Rakesh D. Mistry, Jason N. Doctor, Katherine E. Fleming-Dutra, Ross J. Fleischman, Samuel D. Gaona, Aubyn Stahmer, Larissa S May

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Antibiotics are commonly prescribed during emergency department (ED) and urgent care center (UCC) visits for viral acute respiratory infection (ARI). We evaluate the comparative effectiveness of an antibiotic stewardship intervention adapted for acute care ambulatory settings (adapted intervention) to a stewardship intervention that additionally incorporates behavioral nudges (enhanced intervention) in reducing inappropriate prescriptions. Methods: This study was a pragmatic, cluster-randomized clinical trial conducted in three academic health systems comprising five adult and pediatric EDs and four UCCs. Randomization of the nine sites was stratified by health system; all providers at each site received either the adapted or the enhanced intervention. The main outcome was the proportion of antibiotic-inappropriate ARI diagnosis visits that received an outpatient antibiotic prescription by individual providers. We estimated a hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression model comparing visits during the influenza season for 2016 to 2017 (baseline) and 2017 to 2018 (intervention). Results: There were 44,820 ARI visits among 292 providers across all nine cluster sites. Antibiotic prescribing for ARI visits dropped from 6.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.5% to 7.9%) to 2.4% (95% CI = 1.3% to 3.4%) during the study period. We found a significant reduction in inappropriate prescribing after adjusting for health-system and provider-level effects from 2.2% (95% CI = 1.0% to 3.4%) to 1.5% (95% CI = 0.7% to 2.3%) with an odds ratio of 0.67 (95% CI = 0.54 to 0.82). Difference-in-differences between the two interventions was not significantly different. Conclusion: Implementation of antibiotic stewardship for ARI is feasible and effective in the ED and UCC settings. More intensive behavioral nudging methods were not more effective in high-performance settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Emergency Medical Services
Ambulatory Care
Respiratory Tract Infections
Hospital Emergency Service
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Confidence Intervals
Inappropriate Prescribing
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Health
Logistic Models
Random Allocation
Human Influenza
Prescriptions
Outpatients
Randomized Controlled Trials
Odds Ratio
Pediatrics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

A Multifaceted Intervention Improves Prescribing for Acute Respiratory Infection for Adults and Children in Emergency Department and Urgent Care Settings. / Yadav, Kabir; Meeker, Daniella; Mistry, Rakesh D.; Doctor, Jason N.; Fleming-Dutra, Katherine E.; Fleischman, Ross J.; Gaona, Samuel D.; Stahmer, Aubyn; May, Larissa S.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yadav, Kabir ; Meeker, Daniella ; Mistry, Rakesh D. ; Doctor, Jason N. ; Fleming-Dutra, Katherine E. ; Fleischman, Ross J. ; Gaona, Samuel D. ; Stahmer, Aubyn ; May, Larissa S. / A Multifaceted Intervention Improves Prescribing for Acute Respiratory Infection for Adults and Children in Emergency Department and Urgent Care Settings. In: Academic Emergency Medicine. 2019.
@article{76916d56fa8348eaa003db95a757b079,
title = "A Multifaceted Intervention Improves Prescribing for Acute Respiratory Infection for Adults and Children in Emergency Department and Urgent Care Settings",
abstract = "Background: Antibiotics are commonly prescribed during emergency department (ED) and urgent care center (UCC) visits for viral acute respiratory infection (ARI). We evaluate the comparative effectiveness of an antibiotic stewardship intervention adapted for acute care ambulatory settings (adapted intervention) to a stewardship intervention that additionally incorporates behavioral nudges (enhanced intervention) in reducing inappropriate prescriptions. Methods: This study was a pragmatic, cluster-randomized clinical trial conducted in three academic health systems comprising five adult and pediatric EDs and four UCCs. Randomization of the nine sites was stratified by health system; all providers at each site received either the adapted or the enhanced intervention. The main outcome was the proportion of antibiotic-inappropriate ARI diagnosis visits that received an outpatient antibiotic prescription by individual providers. We estimated a hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression model comparing visits during the influenza season for 2016 to 2017 (baseline) and 2017 to 2018 (intervention). Results: There were 44,820 ARI visits among 292 providers across all nine cluster sites. Antibiotic prescribing for ARI visits dropped from 6.2{\%} (95{\%} confidence interval [CI] = 4.5{\%} to 7.9{\%}) to 2.4{\%} (95{\%} CI = 1.3{\%} to 3.4{\%}) during the study period. We found a significant reduction in inappropriate prescribing after adjusting for health-system and provider-level effects from 2.2{\%} (95{\%} CI = 1.0{\%} to 3.4{\%}) to 1.5{\%} (95{\%} CI = 0.7{\%} to 2.3{\%}) with an odds ratio of 0.67 (95{\%} CI = 0.54 to 0.82). Difference-in-differences between the two interventions was not significantly different. Conclusion: Implementation of antibiotic stewardship for ARI is feasible and effective in the ED and UCC settings. More intensive behavioral nudging methods were not more effective in high-performance settings.",
author = "Kabir Yadav and Daniella Meeker and Mistry, {Rakesh D.} and Doctor, {Jason N.} and Fleming-Dutra, {Katherine E.} and Fleischman, {Ross J.} and Gaona, {Samuel D.} and Aubyn Stahmer and May, {Larissa S}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/acem.13690",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Multifaceted Intervention Improves Prescribing for Acute Respiratory Infection for Adults and Children in Emergency Department and Urgent Care Settings

AU - Yadav, Kabir

AU - Meeker, Daniella

AU - Mistry, Rakesh D.

AU - Doctor, Jason N.

AU - Fleming-Dutra, Katherine E.

AU - Fleischman, Ross J.

AU - Gaona, Samuel D.

AU - Stahmer, Aubyn

AU - May, Larissa S

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Antibiotics are commonly prescribed during emergency department (ED) and urgent care center (UCC) visits for viral acute respiratory infection (ARI). We evaluate the comparative effectiveness of an antibiotic stewardship intervention adapted for acute care ambulatory settings (adapted intervention) to a stewardship intervention that additionally incorporates behavioral nudges (enhanced intervention) in reducing inappropriate prescriptions. Methods: This study was a pragmatic, cluster-randomized clinical trial conducted in three academic health systems comprising five adult and pediatric EDs and four UCCs. Randomization of the nine sites was stratified by health system; all providers at each site received either the adapted or the enhanced intervention. The main outcome was the proportion of antibiotic-inappropriate ARI diagnosis visits that received an outpatient antibiotic prescription by individual providers. We estimated a hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression model comparing visits during the influenza season for 2016 to 2017 (baseline) and 2017 to 2018 (intervention). Results: There were 44,820 ARI visits among 292 providers across all nine cluster sites. Antibiotic prescribing for ARI visits dropped from 6.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.5% to 7.9%) to 2.4% (95% CI = 1.3% to 3.4%) during the study period. We found a significant reduction in inappropriate prescribing after adjusting for health-system and provider-level effects from 2.2% (95% CI = 1.0% to 3.4%) to 1.5% (95% CI = 0.7% to 2.3%) with an odds ratio of 0.67 (95% CI = 0.54 to 0.82). Difference-in-differences between the two interventions was not significantly different. Conclusion: Implementation of antibiotic stewardship for ARI is feasible and effective in the ED and UCC settings. More intensive behavioral nudging methods were not more effective in high-performance settings.

AB - Background: Antibiotics are commonly prescribed during emergency department (ED) and urgent care center (UCC) visits for viral acute respiratory infection (ARI). We evaluate the comparative effectiveness of an antibiotic stewardship intervention adapted for acute care ambulatory settings (adapted intervention) to a stewardship intervention that additionally incorporates behavioral nudges (enhanced intervention) in reducing inappropriate prescriptions. Methods: This study was a pragmatic, cluster-randomized clinical trial conducted in three academic health systems comprising five adult and pediatric EDs and four UCCs. Randomization of the nine sites was stratified by health system; all providers at each site received either the adapted or the enhanced intervention. The main outcome was the proportion of antibiotic-inappropriate ARI diagnosis visits that received an outpatient antibiotic prescription by individual providers. We estimated a hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression model comparing visits during the influenza season for 2016 to 2017 (baseline) and 2017 to 2018 (intervention). Results: There were 44,820 ARI visits among 292 providers across all nine cluster sites. Antibiotic prescribing for ARI visits dropped from 6.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.5% to 7.9%) to 2.4% (95% CI = 1.3% to 3.4%) during the study period. We found a significant reduction in inappropriate prescribing after adjusting for health-system and provider-level effects from 2.2% (95% CI = 1.0% to 3.4%) to 1.5% (95% CI = 0.7% to 2.3%) with an odds ratio of 0.67 (95% CI = 0.54 to 0.82). Difference-in-differences between the two interventions was not significantly different. Conclusion: Implementation of antibiotic stewardship for ARI is feasible and effective in the ED and UCC settings. More intensive behavioral nudging methods were not more effective in high-performance settings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067484036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067484036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/acem.13690

DO - 10.1111/acem.13690

M3 - Article

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

ER -