A multicenter comparison of inpatient resource use for adult spinal deformity surgery

Richard Hostin, Chessie Robinson, Michael O'Brien, Christopher Ames, Frank Schwab, Justin S. Smith, Virginie Lafage, Munish Gupta, Robert Hart, Douglas Burton, Shay Bess, Christopher Schaffrey, Ian McCarthy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design. Multicenter, retrospective analysis, prospective database, consecutive case series. Objective. This study examines multicenter variability in patient-level surgical resource use, including implants, biologics, and length of stay (LOS), alongside health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) improvements after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Summary of Background Data. Efficiency in surgical resource use is critical to high-value health care. Decision makers and payers are placing increasing scrutiny on the costs and outcomes associated with complex spine surgery. Little is currently known regarding the variation in resources used and associated outcomes in complex spine surgeries. Methods. HRQoL outcomes were calculated from the Oswestry Disability Index, disease-specific 22-item Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire, and Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-question health survey domain scores. Changes in HRQoL were estimated as the difference between baseline and 2-year values. Patient-level surgical resources included blood use, bone morphogenetic protein volume, LOS, and implants. Patients were classified by mild, moderate, or severe sagittal modifier and analyzed across centers using analysis of variance and multivariable regression. Results. We analyzed 251 ASD patients, who were predominantly female (n=207, 85%) with an average of 56 years (range 18-84 years). Significant differences were found in the average 2- year change in HRQoL across centers; however, this difference was found insignificant after controlling for patients within the same modifier groups (P>.05). However, significant differences were found across centers in average resources used per surgery (P<0.05), with only LOS not reaching significance (P>0.05). After accounting for clinical, demographic, and regional characteristics at the patient level, variation among centers persisted in resource use with no corresponding statistical differences in HRQoL outcomes. Conclusion. The use of additional surgical resources does not appear to impact 2-year HRQoL outcomes after surgery for ASD. The estimated impact of physician preference on surgical resource utilization highlights the variation in current surgical practice and the opportunity for cost reductions via a more standardized approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)603-609
Number of pages7
JournalSpine
Volume41
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Inpatients
Quality of Life
Length of Stay
Spine
Costs and Cost Analysis
Bone Morphogenetic Proteins
Medical Societies
Scoliosis
Quality Improvement
Health Surveys
Biological Products
Multicenter Studies
Analysis of Variance
Demography
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases
Delivery of Health Care
Physicians
Research

Keywords

  • Adult spinal deformity
  • Health-related quality-oflife
  • Implants
  • Multicenter
  • Patient-reported outcome measures
  • Sagittal modifiers
  • Scoliosis
  • sRS-Schwab classification
  • Surgical resource utilization
  • Surgical variability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Hostin, R., Robinson, C., O'Brien, M., Ames, C., Schwab, F., Smith, J. S., ... McCarthy, I. (2016). A multicenter comparison of inpatient resource use for adult spinal deformity surgery. Spine, 41(7), 603-609. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001280

A multicenter comparison of inpatient resource use for adult spinal deformity surgery. / Hostin, Richard; Robinson, Chessie; O'Brien, Michael; Ames, Christopher; Schwab, Frank; Smith, Justin S.; Lafage, Virginie; Gupta, Munish; Hart, Robert; Burton, Douglas; Bess, Shay; Schaffrey, Christopher; McCarthy, Ian.

In: Spine, Vol. 41, No. 7, 2016, p. 603-609.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hostin, R, Robinson, C, O'Brien, M, Ames, C, Schwab, F, Smith, JS, Lafage, V, Gupta, M, Hart, R, Burton, D, Bess, S, Schaffrey, C & McCarthy, I 2016, 'A multicenter comparison of inpatient resource use for adult spinal deformity surgery', Spine, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 603-609. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001280
Hostin R, Robinson C, O'Brien M, Ames C, Schwab F, Smith JS et al. A multicenter comparison of inpatient resource use for adult spinal deformity surgery. Spine. 2016;41(7):603-609. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001280
Hostin, Richard ; Robinson, Chessie ; O'Brien, Michael ; Ames, Christopher ; Schwab, Frank ; Smith, Justin S. ; Lafage, Virginie ; Gupta, Munish ; Hart, Robert ; Burton, Douglas ; Bess, Shay ; Schaffrey, Christopher ; McCarthy, Ian. / A multicenter comparison of inpatient resource use for adult spinal deformity surgery. In: Spine. 2016 ; Vol. 41, No. 7. pp. 603-609.
@article{f5cdaeb957094986b9f99b63db6a8b44,
title = "A multicenter comparison of inpatient resource use for adult spinal deformity surgery",
abstract = "Study Design. Multicenter, retrospective analysis, prospective database, consecutive case series. Objective. This study examines multicenter variability in patient-level surgical resource use, including implants, biologics, and length of stay (LOS), alongside health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) improvements after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Summary of Background Data. Efficiency in surgical resource use is critical to high-value health care. Decision makers and payers are placing increasing scrutiny on the costs and outcomes associated with complex spine surgery. Little is currently known regarding the variation in resources used and associated outcomes in complex spine surgeries. Methods. HRQoL outcomes were calculated from the Oswestry Disability Index, disease-specific 22-item Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire, and Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-question health survey domain scores. Changes in HRQoL were estimated as the difference between baseline and 2-year values. Patient-level surgical resources included blood use, bone morphogenetic protein volume, LOS, and implants. Patients were classified by mild, moderate, or severe sagittal modifier and analyzed across centers using analysis of variance and multivariable regression. Results. We analyzed 251 ASD patients, who were predominantly female (n=207, 85{\%}) with an average of 56 years (range 18-84 years). Significant differences were found in the average 2- year change in HRQoL across centers; however, this difference was found insignificant after controlling for patients within the same modifier groups (P>.05). However, significant differences were found across centers in average resources used per surgery (P<0.05), with only LOS not reaching significance (P>0.05). After accounting for clinical, demographic, and regional characteristics at the patient level, variation among centers persisted in resource use with no corresponding statistical differences in HRQoL outcomes. Conclusion. The use of additional surgical resources does not appear to impact 2-year HRQoL outcomes after surgery for ASD. The estimated impact of physician preference on surgical resource utilization highlights the variation in current surgical practice and the opportunity for cost reductions via a more standardized approach.",
keywords = "Adult spinal deformity, Health-related quality-oflife, Implants, Multicenter, Patient-reported outcome measures, Sagittal modifiers, Scoliosis, sRS-Schwab classification, Surgical resource utilization, Surgical variability",
author = "Richard Hostin and Chessie Robinson and Michael O'Brien and Christopher Ames and Frank Schwab and Smith, {Justin S.} and Virginie Lafage and Munish Gupta and Robert Hart and Douglas Burton and Shay Bess and Christopher Schaffrey and Ian McCarthy",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0000000000001280",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "603--609",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A multicenter comparison of inpatient resource use for adult spinal deformity surgery

AU - Hostin, Richard

AU - Robinson, Chessie

AU - O'Brien, Michael

AU - Ames, Christopher

AU - Schwab, Frank

AU - Smith, Justin S.

AU - Lafage, Virginie

AU - Gupta, Munish

AU - Hart, Robert

AU - Burton, Douglas

AU - Bess, Shay

AU - Schaffrey, Christopher

AU - McCarthy, Ian

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Study Design. Multicenter, retrospective analysis, prospective database, consecutive case series. Objective. This study examines multicenter variability in patient-level surgical resource use, including implants, biologics, and length of stay (LOS), alongside health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) improvements after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Summary of Background Data. Efficiency in surgical resource use is critical to high-value health care. Decision makers and payers are placing increasing scrutiny on the costs and outcomes associated with complex spine surgery. Little is currently known regarding the variation in resources used and associated outcomes in complex spine surgeries. Methods. HRQoL outcomes were calculated from the Oswestry Disability Index, disease-specific 22-item Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire, and Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-question health survey domain scores. Changes in HRQoL were estimated as the difference between baseline and 2-year values. Patient-level surgical resources included blood use, bone morphogenetic protein volume, LOS, and implants. Patients were classified by mild, moderate, or severe sagittal modifier and analyzed across centers using analysis of variance and multivariable regression. Results. We analyzed 251 ASD patients, who were predominantly female (n=207, 85%) with an average of 56 years (range 18-84 years). Significant differences were found in the average 2- year change in HRQoL across centers; however, this difference was found insignificant after controlling for patients within the same modifier groups (P>.05). However, significant differences were found across centers in average resources used per surgery (P<0.05), with only LOS not reaching significance (P>0.05). After accounting for clinical, demographic, and regional characteristics at the patient level, variation among centers persisted in resource use with no corresponding statistical differences in HRQoL outcomes. Conclusion. The use of additional surgical resources does not appear to impact 2-year HRQoL outcomes after surgery for ASD. The estimated impact of physician preference on surgical resource utilization highlights the variation in current surgical practice and the opportunity for cost reductions via a more standardized approach.

AB - Study Design. Multicenter, retrospective analysis, prospective database, consecutive case series. Objective. This study examines multicenter variability in patient-level surgical resource use, including implants, biologics, and length of stay (LOS), alongside health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) improvements after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Summary of Background Data. Efficiency in surgical resource use is critical to high-value health care. Decision makers and payers are placing increasing scrutiny on the costs and outcomes associated with complex spine surgery. Little is currently known regarding the variation in resources used and associated outcomes in complex spine surgeries. Methods. HRQoL outcomes were calculated from the Oswestry Disability Index, disease-specific 22-item Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire, and Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-question health survey domain scores. Changes in HRQoL were estimated as the difference between baseline and 2-year values. Patient-level surgical resources included blood use, bone morphogenetic protein volume, LOS, and implants. Patients were classified by mild, moderate, or severe sagittal modifier and analyzed across centers using analysis of variance and multivariable regression. Results. We analyzed 251 ASD patients, who were predominantly female (n=207, 85%) with an average of 56 years (range 18-84 years). Significant differences were found in the average 2- year change in HRQoL across centers; however, this difference was found insignificant after controlling for patients within the same modifier groups (P>.05). However, significant differences were found across centers in average resources used per surgery (P<0.05), with only LOS not reaching significance (P>0.05). After accounting for clinical, demographic, and regional characteristics at the patient level, variation among centers persisted in resource use with no corresponding statistical differences in HRQoL outcomes. Conclusion. The use of additional surgical resources does not appear to impact 2-year HRQoL outcomes after surgery for ASD. The estimated impact of physician preference on surgical resource utilization highlights the variation in current surgical practice and the opportunity for cost reductions via a more standardized approach.

KW - Adult spinal deformity

KW - Health-related quality-oflife

KW - Implants

KW - Multicenter

KW - Patient-reported outcome measures

KW - Sagittal modifiers

KW - Scoliosis

KW - sRS-Schwab classification

KW - Surgical resource utilization

KW - Surgical variability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962045163&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962045163&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001280

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001280

M3 - Article

C2 - 27014953

AN - SCOPUS:84962045163

VL - 41

SP - 603

EP - 609

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 7

ER -