A matrix model for valuing anesthesia service with the resource-based relative value system

David R. Sinclair, David Lubarsky, Michael M. Vigoda, David J. Birnbach, Eric A. Harris, Vicente Behrens, Richard E. Bazan, Steve M. Williams, Kristopher Arheart, Keith A. Candiotti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to propose a new crosswalk using the resource-based relative value system (RBRVS) that preserves the time unit component of the anesthesia service and disaggregates anesthesia billing into component parts (preoperative evaluation, intraoperative management, and postoperative evaluation). The study was designed as an observational chart and billing data review of current and proposed payments, in the setting of a preoperative holing area, intraoperative suite, and post anesthesia care unit. In total, 1,195 charts of American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status 1 through 5 patients were reviewed. No direct patient interventions were undertaken.Results: Spearman correlations between the proposed RBRVS billing matrix payments and the current ASA relative value guide methodology payments were strong (r=0.94-0.96, P,0.001 for training, test, and overall). The proposed RBRVS-based billing matrix yielded payments that were 3.0%±1.34% less than would have been expected from commercial insurers, using standard rates for commercial ASA relative value units and RBRVS relative value units. Compared with current Medicare reimbursement under the ASA relative value guide, reimbursement would almost double when converting to an RBRVS billing model. The greatest increases in Medicare reimbursement between the current system and proposed billing model occurred as anesthetic management complexity increased.Conclusion: The new crosswalk correlates with existing evaluation and management and intensive care medicine codes in an essentially revenue neutral manner when applied to the market-based rates of commercial insurers. The new system more highly values delivery of care to more complex patients undergoing more complex surgery and better represents the true value of anesthetic case management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)449-458
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Volume7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 8 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Anesthesiology
Anesthesia
Insurance Carriers
Medicare
Anesthetics
Case Management
Critical Care
Medicine

Keywords

  • Billing
  • Crosswalk
  • Payment reform

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Sinclair, D. R., Lubarsky, D., Vigoda, M. M., Birnbach, D. J., Harris, E. A., Behrens, V., ... Candiotti, K. A. (2014). A matrix model for valuing anesthesia service with the resource-based relative value system. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 7, 449-458. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S67929

A matrix model for valuing anesthesia service with the resource-based relative value system. / Sinclair, David R.; Lubarsky, David; Vigoda, Michael M.; Birnbach, David J.; Harris, Eric A.; Behrens, Vicente; Bazan, Richard E.; Williams, Steve M.; Arheart, Kristopher; Candiotti, Keith A.

In: Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, Vol. 7, 08.10.2014, p. 449-458.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sinclair, DR, Lubarsky, D, Vigoda, MM, Birnbach, DJ, Harris, EA, Behrens, V, Bazan, RE, Williams, SM, Arheart, K & Candiotti, KA 2014, 'A matrix model for valuing anesthesia service with the resource-based relative value system', Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, vol. 7, pp. 449-458. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S67929
Sinclair, David R. ; Lubarsky, David ; Vigoda, Michael M. ; Birnbach, David J. ; Harris, Eric A. ; Behrens, Vicente ; Bazan, Richard E. ; Williams, Steve M. ; Arheart, Kristopher ; Candiotti, Keith A. / A matrix model for valuing anesthesia service with the resource-based relative value system. In: Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2014 ; Vol. 7. pp. 449-458.
@article{a9807c3ced2d4ab6a7f8c03f4045a619,
title = "A matrix model for valuing anesthesia service with the resource-based relative value system",
abstract = "Background: The purpose of this study was to propose a new crosswalk using the resource-based relative value system (RBRVS) that preserves the time unit component of the anesthesia service and disaggregates anesthesia billing into component parts (preoperative evaluation, intraoperative management, and postoperative evaluation). The study was designed as an observational chart and billing data review of current and proposed payments, in the setting of a preoperative holing area, intraoperative suite, and post anesthesia care unit. In total, 1,195 charts of American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status 1 through 5 patients were reviewed. No direct patient interventions were undertaken.Results: Spearman correlations between the proposed RBRVS billing matrix payments and the current ASA relative value guide methodology payments were strong (r=0.94-0.96, P,0.001 for training, test, and overall). The proposed RBRVS-based billing matrix yielded payments that were 3.0{\%}±1.34{\%} less than would have been expected from commercial insurers, using standard rates for commercial ASA relative value units and RBRVS relative value units. Compared with current Medicare reimbursement under the ASA relative value guide, reimbursement would almost double when converting to an RBRVS billing model. The greatest increases in Medicare reimbursement between the current system and proposed billing model occurred as anesthetic management complexity increased.Conclusion: The new crosswalk correlates with existing evaluation and management and intensive care medicine codes in an essentially revenue neutral manner when applied to the market-based rates of commercial insurers. The new system more highly values delivery of care to more complex patients undergoing more complex surgery and better represents the true value of anesthetic case management.",
keywords = "Billing, Crosswalk, Payment reform",
author = "Sinclair, {David R.} and David Lubarsky and Vigoda, {Michael M.} and Birnbach, {David J.} and Harris, {Eric A.} and Vicente Behrens and Bazan, {Richard E.} and Williams, {Steve M.} and Kristopher Arheart and Candiotti, {Keith A.}",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "8",
doi = "10.2147/JMDH.S67929",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "449--458",
journal = "Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare",
issn = "1178-2390",
publisher = "Dove Medical Press Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A matrix model for valuing anesthesia service with the resource-based relative value system

AU - Sinclair, David R.

AU - Lubarsky, David

AU - Vigoda, Michael M.

AU - Birnbach, David J.

AU - Harris, Eric A.

AU - Behrens, Vicente

AU - Bazan, Richard E.

AU - Williams, Steve M.

AU - Arheart, Kristopher

AU - Candiotti, Keith A.

PY - 2014/10/8

Y1 - 2014/10/8

N2 - Background: The purpose of this study was to propose a new crosswalk using the resource-based relative value system (RBRVS) that preserves the time unit component of the anesthesia service and disaggregates anesthesia billing into component parts (preoperative evaluation, intraoperative management, and postoperative evaluation). The study was designed as an observational chart and billing data review of current and proposed payments, in the setting of a preoperative holing area, intraoperative suite, and post anesthesia care unit. In total, 1,195 charts of American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status 1 through 5 patients were reviewed. No direct patient interventions were undertaken.Results: Spearman correlations between the proposed RBRVS billing matrix payments and the current ASA relative value guide methodology payments were strong (r=0.94-0.96, P,0.001 for training, test, and overall). The proposed RBRVS-based billing matrix yielded payments that were 3.0%±1.34% less than would have been expected from commercial insurers, using standard rates for commercial ASA relative value units and RBRVS relative value units. Compared with current Medicare reimbursement under the ASA relative value guide, reimbursement would almost double when converting to an RBRVS billing model. The greatest increases in Medicare reimbursement between the current system and proposed billing model occurred as anesthetic management complexity increased.Conclusion: The new crosswalk correlates with existing evaluation and management and intensive care medicine codes in an essentially revenue neutral manner when applied to the market-based rates of commercial insurers. The new system more highly values delivery of care to more complex patients undergoing more complex surgery and better represents the true value of anesthetic case management.

AB - Background: The purpose of this study was to propose a new crosswalk using the resource-based relative value system (RBRVS) that preserves the time unit component of the anesthesia service and disaggregates anesthesia billing into component parts (preoperative evaluation, intraoperative management, and postoperative evaluation). The study was designed as an observational chart and billing data review of current and proposed payments, in the setting of a preoperative holing area, intraoperative suite, and post anesthesia care unit. In total, 1,195 charts of American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status 1 through 5 patients were reviewed. No direct patient interventions were undertaken.Results: Spearman correlations between the proposed RBRVS billing matrix payments and the current ASA relative value guide methodology payments were strong (r=0.94-0.96, P,0.001 for training, test, and overall). The proposed RBRVS-based billing matrix yielded payments that were 3.0%±1.34% less than would have been expected from commercial insurers, using standard rates for commercial ASA relative value units and RBRVS relative value units. Compared with current Medicare reimbursement under the ASA relative value guide, reimbursement would almost double when converting to an RBRVS billing model. The greatest increases in Medicare reimbursement between the current system and proposed billing model occurred as anesthetic management complexity increased.Conclusion: The new crosswalk correlates with existing evaluation and management and intensive care medicine codes in an essentially revenue neutral manner when applied to the market-based rates of commercial insurers. The new system more highly values delivery of care to more complex patients undergoing more complex surgery and better represents the true value of anesthetic case management.

KW - Billing

KW - Crosswalk

KW - Payment reform

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908137930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908137930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2147/JMDH.S67929

DO - 10.2147/JMDH.S67929

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84908137930

VL - 7

SP - 449

EP - 458

JO - Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare

JF - Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare

SN - 1178-2390

ER -