A framework for telepsychiatric training and e-health: Competency-based education, evaluation and implications

Donald M. Hilty, Allison Crawford, John Teshima, Steven Chan, Nadiya Sunderji, Peter Mackinlay Yellowlees, Greg Kramer, Patrick O'Neill, Chris Fore, John Luo, Su-Ting Terry Li

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Telepsychiatry (TP; video; synchronous) is effective, well received and a standard way to practice. Best practices in TP education, but not its desired outcomes, have been published. This paper proposes competencies for trainees and clinicians, with TP situated within the broader landscape of e-mental health (e-MH) care. TP competencies are organized using the US Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education framework, with input from the CanMEDS framework. Teaching and assessment methods are aligned with target competencies, learning contexts, and evaluation options. Case examples help to apply concepts to clinical and institutional contexts. Competencies can be identified, measured and evaluated. Novice or advanced beginner, competent/proficient, and expert levels were outlined. Andragogical (i.e. pedagogical) methods are used in clinical care, seminar, and other educational contexts. Cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluation using quantitative and qualitative measures promotes skills development via iterative feedback from patients, trainees, and faculty staff. TP and e-MH care significantly overlap, such that institutional leaders may use a common approach for change management and an e-platform to prioritize resources. TP training and assessment methods need to be implemented and evaluated. Institutional approaches to patient care, education, faculty development, and funding also need to be studied.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)569-592
Number of pages24
JournalInternational Review of Psychiatry
Volume27
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2 2015

Fingerprint

Competency-Based Education
Mental Health
Health
Delivery of Health Care
Graduate Medical Education
Education
Needs Assessment
Accreditation
Practice Guidelines
Patient Care
Teaching
Learning

Keywords

  • academic
  • assessment
  • centers
  • clinical practice
  • competency
  • e-health
  • education
  • evaluation
  • health
  • mental
  • outcome
  • telemedicine
  • Telemental
  • telepsychiatry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

A framework for telepsychiatric training and e-health : Competency-based education, evaluation and implications. / Hilty, Donald M.; Crawford, Allison; Teshima, John; Chan, Steven; Sunderji, Nadiya; Yellowlees, Peter Mackinlay; Kramer, Greg; O'Neill, Patrick; Fore, Chris; Luo, John; Li, Su-Ting Terry.

In: International Review of Psychiatry, Vol. 27, No. 6, 02.11.2015, p. 569-592.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hilty, Donald M. ; Crawford, Allison ; Teshima, John ; Chan, Steven ; Sunderji, Nadiya ; Yellowlees, Peter Mackinlay ; Kramer, Greg ; O'Neill, Patrick ; Fore, Chris ; Luo, John ; Li, Su-Ting Terry. / A framework for telepsychiatric training and e-health : Competency-based education, evaluation and implications. In: International Review of Psychiatry. 2015 ; Vol. 27, No. 6. pp. 569-592.
@article{f3e4a0ff9aad4542b4793d618b71ec3d,
title = "A framework for telepsychiatric training and e-health: Competency-based education, evaluation and implications",
abstract = "Telepsychiatry (TP; video; synchronous) is effective, well received and a standard way to practice. Best practices in TP education, but not its desired outcomes, have been published. This paper proposes competencies for trainees and clinicians, with TP situated within the broader landscape of e-mental health (e-MH) care. TP competencies are organized using the US Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education framework, with input from the CanMEDS framework. Teaching and assessment methods are aligned with target competencies, learning contexts, and evaluation options. Case examples help to apply concepts to clinical and institutional contexts. Competencies can be identified, measured and evaluated. Novice or advanced beginner, competent/proficient, and expert levels were outlined. Andragogical (i.e. pedagogical) methods are used in clinical care, seminar, and other educational contexts. Cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluation using quantitative and qualitative measures promotes skills development via iterative feedback from patients, trainees, and faculty staff. TP and e-MH care significantly overlap, such that institutional leaders may use a common approach for change management and an e-platform to prioritize resources. TP training and assessment methods need to be implemented and evaluated. Institutional approaches to patient care, education, faculty development, and funding also need to be studied.",
keywords = "academic, assessment, centers, clinical practice, competency, e-health, education, evaluation, health, mental, outcome, telemedicine, Telemental, telepsychiatry",
author = "Hilty, {Donald M.} and Allison Crawford and John Teshima and Steven Chan and Nadiya Sunderji and Yellowlees, {Peter Mackinlay} and Greg Kramer and Patrick O'Neill and Chris Fore and John Luo and Li, {Su-Ting Terry}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "2",
doi = "10.3109/09540261.2015.1091292",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "569--592",
journal = "International Review of Psychiatry",
issn = "0954-0261",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A framework for telepsychiatric training and e-health

T2 - Competency-based education, evaluation and implications

AU - Hilty, Donald M.

AU - Crawford, Allison

AU - Teshima, John

AU - Chan, Steven

AU - Sunderji, Nadiya

AU - Yellowlees, Peter Mackinlay

AU - Kramer, Greg

AU - O'Neill, Patrick

AU - Fore, Chris

AU - Luo, John

AU - Li, Su-Ting Terry

PY - 2015/11/2

Y1 - 2015/11/2

N2 - Telepsychiatry (TP; video; synchronous) is effective, well received and a standard way to practice. Best practices in TP education, but not its desired outcomes, have been published. This paper proposes competencies for trainees and clinicians, with TP situated within the broader landscape of e-mental health (e-MH) care. TP competencies are organized using the US Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education framework, with input from the CanMEDS framework. Teaching and assessment methods are aligned with target competencies, learning contexts, and evaluation options. Case examples help to apply concepts to clinical and institutional contexts. Competencies can be identified, measured and evaluated. Novice or advanced beginner, competent/proficient, and expert levels were outlined. Andragogical (i.e. pedagogical) methods are used in clinical care, seminar, and other educational contexts. Cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluation using quantitative and qualitative measures promotes skills development via iterative feedback from patients, trainees, and faculty staff. TP and e-MH care significantly overlap, such that institutional leaders may use a common approach for change management and an e-platform to prioritize resources. TP training and assessment methods need to be implemented and evaluated. Institutional approaches to patient care, education, faculty development, and funding also need to be studied.

AB - Telepsychiatry (TP; video; synchronous) is effective, well received and a standard way to practice. Best practices in TP education, but not its desired outcomes, have been published. This paper proposes competencies for trainees and clinicians, with TP situated within the broader landscape of e-mental health (e-MH) care. TP competencies are organized using the US Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education framework, with input from the CanMEDS framework. Teaching and assessment methods are aligned with target competencies, learning contexts, and evaluation options. Case examples help to apply concepts to clinical and institutional contexts. Competencies can be identified, measured and evaluated. Novice or advanced beginner, competent/proficient, and expert levels were outlined. Andragogical (i.e. pedagogical) methods are used in clinical care, seminar, and other educational contexts. Cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluation using quantitative and qualitative measures promotes skills development via iterative feedback from patients, trainees, and faculty staff. TP and e-MH care significantly overlap, such that institutional leaders may use a common approach for change management and an e-platform to prioritize resources. TP training and assessment methods need to be implemented and evaluated. Institutional approaches to patient care, education, faculty development, and funding also need to be studied.

KW - academic

KW - assessment

KW - centers

KW - clinical practice

KW - competency

KW - e-health

KW - education

KW - evaluation

KW - health

KW - mental

KW - outcome

KW - telemedicine

KW - Telemental

KW - telepsychiatry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949725504&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84949725504&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/09540261.2015.1091292

DO - 10.3109/09540261.2015.1091292

M3 - Article

C2 - 26540642

AN - SCOPUS:84949725504

VL - 27

SP - 569

EP - 592

JO - International Review of Psychiatry

JF - International Review of Psychiatry

SN - 0954-0261

IS - 6

ER -