Abstract
We identify the main themes raised in the commentaries and respond. To summarize: Yes, there were problems with social priming (and most other psychological) research; yes, the definition of social priming matters; no, cherry-picking specific studies to replicate does not amount to a systematic examination of the relevant research; yes, within-subjects social priming studies are robust; yes, it is wrong to conflate research reproducibility and misconduct; and, yes, it was personal.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 49-52 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Psychological Inquiry |
Volume | 32 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2021 |
Keywords
- Priming
- social priming
- train wreck
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Psychology(all)