A filter-paper assay for serum ferrjtin

N. Ahluwalia, B. Lonnerdal, L. Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Serum ferritin (ferr) is often used as the most sensitive indicator of iron status. A "Spot-ferr" method for assessing iron status may be advantageous because samples may be collected by capillary sampling saving cost and concerns associated with venopuncture and ease in storage and handling. Serum samples (20 pJ) were spotted on filter paper (n=47) and kept frozen until analysis. On the day of the assay, spot samples were allowed to thaw to room temperature, incubated in a buffer containing cellulase, centrifuged, and ferr was assayed in the supernatant by a radioimmunoassay (RIA). Serum samples from these individuals (n=47) were also measured by the traditional RIA. Further, 10 serum samples ranging in ferr from 10-185 ng/ml were spotted and stored under 3 different conditions (room temperature, refrigerated, or frozen) for 2 wk prior to assay by the spot-ferr method. Our preliminary results indicate that the spot-ferr method correlated well with the traditional method (r=0.99, p=.0001). The geometric mean (±1SD) for ferr (n=47) was 49 (12-200) by the traditional vs 53 (12-235) ng/ml by the spot-ferr method (t=l .8, p=. 19). However, the spot-ferr method gave 7.4% higher values than the traditional method (paired t=2.2, p<.05). There were no differences in ferr from spot samples stored under different conditions (p>0.05). The spot-ferr method may offer a practical screening tool for field studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalFASEB Journal
Volume10
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

ferritin
Ferritins
Assays
assays
Serum
radioimmunoassays
methodology
sampling
Radioimmunoassay
ambient temperature
Iron
iron
Temperature
Cellulase
cost effectiveness
endo-1,4-beta-glucanase
Buffers
Screening
buffers
Sampling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Biochemistry
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Ahluwalia, N., Lonnerdal, B., & Allen, L. (1996). A filter-paper assay for serum ferrjtin. FASEB Journal, 10(3).

A filter-paper assay for serum ferrjtin. / Ahluwalia, N.; Lonnerdal, B.; Allen, L.

In: FASEB Journal, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1996.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ahluwalia, N, Lonnerdal, B & Allen, L 1996, 'A filter-paper assay for serum ferrjtin', FASEB Journal, vol. 10, no. 3.
Ahluwalia N, Lonnerdal B, Allen L. A filter-paper assay for serum ferrjtin. FASEB Journal. 1996;10(3).
Ahluwalia, N. ; Lonnerdal, B. ; Allen, L. / A filter-paper assay for serum ferrjtin. In: FASEB Journal. 1996 ; Vol. 10, No. 3.
@article{4310cbdf89074e94bd692737829ed504,
title = "A filter-paper assay for serum ferrjtin",
abstract = "Serum ferritin (ferr) is often used as the most sensitive indicator of iron status. A {"}Spot-ferr{"} method for assessing iron status may be advantageous because samples may be collected by capillary sampling saving cost and concerns associated with venopuncture and ease in storage and handling. Serum samples (20 pJ) were spotted on filter paper (n=47) and kept frozen until analysis. On the day of the assay, spot samples were allowed to thaw to room temperature, incubated in a buffer containing cellulase, centrifuged, and ferr was assayed in the supernatant by a radioimmunoassay (RIA). Serum samples from these individuals (n=47) were also measured by the traditional RIA. Further, 10 serum samples ranging in ferr from 10-185 ng/ml were spotted and stored under 3 different conditions (room temperature, refrigerated, or frozen) for 2 wk prior to assay by the spot-ferr method. Our preliminary results indicate that the spot-ferr method correlated well with the traditional method (r=0.99, p=.0001). The geometric mean (±1SD) for ferr (n=47) was 49 (12-200) by the traditional vs 53 (12-235) ng/ml by the spot-ferr method (t=l .8, p=. 19). However, the spot-ferr method gave 7.4{\%} higher values than the traditional method (paired t=2.2, p<.05). There were no differences in ferr from spot samples stored under different conditions (p>0.05). The spot-ferr method may offer a practical screening tool for field studies.",
author = "N. Ahluwalia and B. Lonnerdal and L. Allen",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
journal = "FASEB Journal",
issn = "0892-6638",
publisher = "FASEB",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A filter-paper assay for serum ferrjtin

AU - Ahluwalia, N.

AU - Lonnerdal, B.

AU - Allen, L.

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Serum ferritin (ferr) is often used as the most sensitive indicator of iron status. A "Spot-ferr" method for assessing iron status may be advantageous because samples may be collected by capillary sampling saving cost and concerns associated with venopuncture and ease in storage and handling. Serum samples (20 pJ) were spotted on filter paper (n=47) and kept frozen until analysis. On the day of the assay, spot samples were allowed to thaw to room temperature, incubated in a buffer containing cellulase, centrifuged, and ferr was assayed in the supernatant by a radioimmunoassay (RIA). Serum samples from these individuals (n=47) were also measured by the traditional RIA. Further, 10 serum samples ranging in ferr from 10-185 ng/ml were spotted and stored under 3 different conditions (room temperature, refrigerated, or frozen) for 2 wk prior to assay by the spot-ferr method. Our preliminary results indicate that the spot-ferr method correlated well with the traditional method (r=0.99, p=.0001). The geometric mean (±1SD) for ferr (n=47) was 49 (12-200) by the traditional vs 53 (12-235) ng/ml by the spot-ferr method (t=l .8, p=. 19). However, the spot-ferr method gave 7.4% higher values than the traditional method (paired t=2.2, p<.05). There were no differences in ferr from spot samples stored under different conditions (p>0.05). The spot-ferr method may offer a practical screening tool for field studies.

AB - Serum ferritin (ferr) is often used as the most sensitive indicator of iron status. A "Spot-ferr" method for assessing iron status may be advantageous because samples may be collected by capillary sampling saving cost and concerns associated with venopuncture and ease in storage and handling. Serum samples (20 pJ) were spotted on filter paper (n=47) and kept frozen until analysis. On the day of the assay, spot samples were allowed to thaw to room temperature, incubated in a buffer containing cellulase, centrifuged, and ferr was assayed in the supernatant by a radioimmunoassay (RIA). Serum samples from these individuals (n=47) were also measured by the traditional RIA. Further, 10 serum samples ranging in ferr from 10-185 ng/ml were spotted and stored under 3 different conditions (room temperature, refrigerated, or frozen) for 2 wk prior to assay by the spot-ferr method. Our preliminary results indicate that the spot-ferr method correlated well with the traditional method (r=0.99, p=.0001). The geometric mean (±1SD) for ferr (n=47) was 49 (12-200) by the traditional vs 53 (12-235) ng/ml by the spot-ferr method (t=l .8, p=. 19). However, the spot-ferr method gave 7.4% higher values than the traditional method (paired t=2.2, p<.05). There were no differences in ferr from spot samples stored under different conditions (p>0.05). The spot-ferr method may offer a practical screening tool for field studies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749096942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749096942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33749096942

VL - 10

JO - FASEB Journal

JF - FASEB Journal

SN - 0892-6638

IS - 3

ER -