A comparison study of laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass for morbid obesity

Ninh T. Nguyen, Hung S Ho, Levi S. Palmer, Bruce M. Wolfe, Harvey J. Sugerman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

162 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (GBP) has been previously described, but a comparative study between laparoscopic, and open GBP has not been reported. The purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes of laparoscopic GBP with those of open GBP for treatment of morbid obesity. Study Design: From August 1998 to September 1999, we prospectively collected outcome data on 35 patients with body-mass indices between 40 kg/m2 and 60 kg/m2 who underwent laparoscopic GBP. Demographics, operative data, perioperative complications, and weight losses were collected and compared with those obtained from a retrospective chart review of 35 patients with body-mass indices between 40 kg/m2 and 60 kg/m2 who underwent open GBP before August 1998. Results: Age, gender, preoperative body-mass index, preoperative comorbidity, and earlier abdominal surgery were similar in both groups. All laparoscopic operations were completed without conversion to laparotomy. Mean operative time, operative blood loss, length of intensive care stay, and length of hospital stay were significantly less after laparoscopic GBP than after open GBP (p < 0.05). There was no 30-day mortality in either group. At 1-year followup, analysis of the percentage of excess body weight loss showed no significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is technically feasible and safe. Laparoscopic GBP confers the clinical benefits of laparoscopy and an initial weight loss similar to that of open GBP. (C) 2000 by the American College of Surgeons.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)149-157
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume191
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Gastric Bypass
Morbid Obesity
Weight Loss
Body Mass Index
Length of Stay
Critical Care
Operative Time
Laparoscopy
Laparotomy
Comorbidity
Body Weight
Demography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

A comparison study of laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass for morbid obesity. / Nguyen, Ninh T.; Ho, Hung S; Palmer, Levi S.; Wolfe, Bruce M.; Sugerman, Harvey J.

In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Vol. 191, No. 2, 2000, p. 149-157.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nguyen, Ninh T. ; Ho, Hung S ; Palmer, Levi S. ; Wolfe, Bruce M. ; Sugerman, Harvey J. / A comparison study of laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass for morbid obesity. In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2000 ; Vol. 191, No. 2. pp. 149-157.
@article{682dcbc505604a48bf743aae2545a748,
title = "A comparison study of laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass for morbid obesity",
abstract = "Background: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (GBP) has been previously described, but a comparative study between laparoscopic, and open GBP has not been reported. The purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes of laparoscopic GBP with those of open GBP for treatment of morbid obesity. Study Design: From August 1998 to September 1999, we prospectively collected outcome data on 35 patients with body-mass indices between 40 kg/m2 and 60 kg/m2 who underwent laparoscopic GBP. Demographics, operative data, perioperative complications, and weight losses were collected and compared with those obtained from a retrospective chart review of 35 patients with body-mass indices between 40 kg/m2 and 60 kg/m2 who underwent open GBP before August 1998. Results: Age, gender, preoperative body-mass index, preoperative comorbidity, and earlier abdominal surgery were similar in both groups. All laparoscopic operations were completed without conversion to laparotomy. Mean operative time, operative blood loss, length of intensive care stay, and length of hospital stay were significantly less after laparoscopic GBP than after open GBP (p < 0.05). There was no 30-day mortality in either group. At 1-year followup, analysis of the percentage of excess body weight loss showed no significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is technically feasible and safe. Laparoscopic GBP confers the clinical benefits of laparoscopy and an initial weight loss similar to that of open GBP. (C) 2000 by the American College of Surgeons.",
author = "Nguyen, {Ninh T.} and Ho, {Hung S} and Palmer, {Levi S.} and Wolfe, {Bruce M.} and Sugerman, {Harvey J.}",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1016/S1072-7515(00)00276-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "191",
pages = "149--157",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Surgeons",
issn = "1072-7515",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison study of laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass for morbid obesity

AU - Nguyen, Ninh T.

AU - Ho, Hung S

AU - Palmer, Levi S.

AU - Wolfe, Bruce M.

AU - Sugerman, Harvey J.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Background: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (GBP) has been previously described, but a comparative study between laparoscopic, and open GBP has not been reported. The purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes of laparoscopic GBP with those of open GBP for treatment of morbid obesity. Study Design: From August 1998 to September 1999, we prospectively collected outcome data on 35 patients with body-mass indices between 40 kg/m2 and 60 kg/m2 who underwent laparoscopic GBP. Demographics, operative data, perioperative complications, and weight losses were collected and compared with those obtained from a retrospective chart review of 35 patients with body-mass indices between 40 kg/m2 and 60 kg/m2 who underwent open GBP before August 1998. Results: Age, gender, preoperative body-mass index, preoperative comorbidity, and earlier abdominal surgery were similar in both groups. All laparoscopic operations were completed without conversion to laparotomy. Mean operative time, operative blood loss, length of intensive care stay, and length of hospital stay were significantly less after laparoscopic GBP than after open GBP (p < 0.05). There was no 30-day mortality in either group. At 1-year followup, analysis of the percentage of excess body weight loss showed no significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is technically feasible and safe. Laparoscopic GBP confers the clinical benefits of laparoscopy and an initial weight loss similar to that of open GBP. (C) 2000 by the American College of Surgeons.

AB - Background: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (GBP) has been previously described, but a comparative study between laparoscopic, and open GBP has not been reported. The purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes of laparoscopic GBP with those of open GBP for treatment of morbid obesity. Study Design: From August 1998 to September 1999, we prospectively collected outcome data on 35 patients with body-mass indices between 40 kg/m2 and 60 kg/m2 who underwent laparoscopic GBP. Demographics, operative data, perioperative complications, and weight losses were collected and compared with those obtained from a retrospective chart review of 35 patients with body-mass indices between 40 kg/m2 and 60 kg/m2 who underwent open GBP before August 1998. Results: Age, gender, preoperative body-mass index, preoperative comorbidity, and earlier abdominal surgery were similar in both groups. All laparoscopic operations were completed without conversion to laparotomy. Mean operative time, operative blood loss, length of intensive care stay, and length of hospital stay were significantly less after laparoscopic GBP than after open GBP (p < 0.05). There was no 30-day mortality in either group. At 1-year followup, analysis of the percentage of excess body weight loss showed no significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is technically feasible and safe. Laparoscopic GBP confers the clinical benefits of laparoscopy and an initial weight loss similar to that of open GBP. (C) 2000 by the American College of Surgeons.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033856541&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033856541&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1072-7515(00)00276-3

DO - 10.1016/S1072-7515(00)00276-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 10945358

AN - SCOPUS:0033856541

VL - 191

SP - 149

EP - 157

JO - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

JF - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

SN - 1072-7515

IS - 2

ER -