A comparison of whole body rates to tissue rates of amino acid channeling and recycling

Heidi A Rossow, R. L. Baldwin, C. C. Calvert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The estimation of protein fractional synthesis rate (FSR) is dependent on using the appropriate amino acid source to approximate the precursor pool specific radioactivity. Amino acids for protein synthesis can arise from extracellular sources (channeling), intracellular sources or protein degradation (recycling). The objective was to determine if whole body rates were equivalent to tissue rates of recycling and channeling. In order to estimate recycling and channeling, a dynamic, theoretical model of protein turnover for a non-growing 26g mouse was developed using 14C leucine in a flooding dose. The model consists of three protein pools turning over at fast (102umoles leu, t1/2 = 11.5hr), medium (212umoles leu, t1/2 = 16.6hr) or slow (536umoles leu, t1/2 = 71.5hr) rates and three free amino acids pools; leucyl-tRNA (0.0249umoles leu), intracellular leucine (5.72umoles leu) and extracellular leucine (1.69umoles leu). The model was adjusted to represent protein turnover in specific tissues: liver, muscle and intestine. Specific radioactivities from whole body and tissue experiments were fit to the whole body and tissue models, respectively, to estimate the rates of recycling and channeling. Data from 14C leucine flooding dose experiments in whole mice showed amino acids for protein synthesis were from extracellular sources. However, data from tissues indicated that in fast turnover tissues, amino acids for protein synthesis were primarily from recycling. Therefore current methods of estimating FSR include error associated with incorrectly estimating the precursor pool specific radioactivity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalFASEB Journal
Volume12
Issue number5
StatePublished - Mar 20 1998

Fingerprint

Recycling
recycling
Tissue
Amino Acids
leucine
amino acids
Leucine
fractional synthesis rate
Radioactivity
Proteins
protein synthesis
protein metabolism
RNA, Transfer, Leu
mice
dosage
protein degradation
dynamic models
free amino acids
tissues
intestines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Biochemistry
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

A comparison of whole body rates to tissue rates of amino acid channeling and recycling. / Rossow, Heidi A; Baldwin, R. L.; Calvert, C. C.

In: FASEB Journal, Vol. 12, No. 5, 20.03.1998.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ec20fb0133204399af9b884a8f4efbea,
title = "A comparison of whole body rates to tissue rates of amino acid channeling and recycling",
abstract = "The estimation of protein fractional synthesis rate (FSR) is dependent on using the appropriate amino acid source to approximate the precursor pool specific radioactivity. Amino acids for protein synthesis can arise from extracellular sources (channeling), intracellular sources or protein degradation (recycling). The objective was to determine if whole body rates were equivalent to tissue rates of recycling and channeling. In order to estimate recycling and channeling, a dynamic, theoretical model of protein turnover for a non-growing 26g mouse was developed using 14C leucine in a flooding dose. The model consists of three protein pools turning over at fast (102umoles leu, t1/2 = 11.5hr), medium (212umoles leu, t1/2 = 16.6hr) or slow (536umoles leu, t1/2 = 71.5hr) rates and three free amino acids pools; leucyl-tRNA (0.0249umoles leu), intracellular leucine (5.72umoles leu) and extracellular leucine (1.69umoles leu). The model was adjusted to represent protein turnover in specific tissues: liver, muscle and intestine. Specific radioactivities from whole body and tissue experiments were fit to the whole body and tissue models, respectively, to estimate the rates of recycling and channeling. Data from 14C leucine flooding dose experiments in whole mice showed amino acids for protein synthesis were from extracellular sources. However, data from tissues indicated that in fast turnover tissues, amino acids for protein synthesis were primarily from recycling. Therefore current methods of estimating FSR include error associated with incorrectly estimating the precursor pool specific radioactivity.",
author = "Rossow, {Heidi A} and Baldwin, {R. L.} and Calvert, {C. C.}",
year = "1998",
month = "3",
day = "20",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
journal = "FASEB Journal",
issn = "0892-6638",
publisher = "FASEB",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of whole body rates to tissue rates of amino acid channeling and recycling

AU - Rossow, Heidi A

AU - Baldwin, R. L.

AU - Calvert, C. C.

PY - 1998/3/20

Y1 - 1998/3/20

N2 - The estimation of protein fractional synthesis rate (FSR) is dependent on using the appropriate amino acid source to approximate the precursor pool specific radioactivity. Amino acids for protein synthesis can arise from extracellular sources (channeling), intracellular sources or protein degradation (recycling). The objective was to determine if whole body rates were equivalent to tissue rates of recycling and channeling. In order to estimate recycling and channeling, a dynamic, theoretical model of protein turnover for a non-growing 26g mouse was developed using 14C leucine in a flooding dose. The model consists of three protein pools turning over at fast (102umoles leu, t1/2 = 11.5hr), medium (212umoles leu, t1/2 = 16.6hr) or slow (536umoles leu, t1/2 = 71.5hr) rates and three free amino acids pools; leucyl-tRNA (0.0249umoles leu), intracellular leucine (5.72umoles leu) and extracellular leucine (1.69umoles leu). The model was adjusted to represent protein turnover in specific tissues: liver, muscle and intestine. Specific radioactivities from whole body and tissue experiments were fit to the whole body and tissue models, respectively, to estimate the rates of recycling and channeling. Data from 14C leucine flooding dose experiments in whole mice showed amino acids for protein synthesis were from extracellular sources. However, data from tissues indicated that in fast turnover tissues, amino acids for protein synthesis were primarily from recycling. Therefore current methods of estimating FSR include error associated with incorrectly estimating the precursor pool specific radioactivity.

AB - The estimation of protein fractional synthesis rate (FSR) is dependent on using the appropriate amino acid source to approximate the precursor pool specific radioactivity. Amino acids for protein synthesis can arise from extracellular sources (channeling), intracellular sources or protein degradation (recycling). The objective was to determine if whole body rates were equivalent to tissue rates of recycling and channeling. In order to estimate recycling and channeling, a dynamic, theoretical model of protein turnover for a non-growing 26g mouse was developed using 14C leucine in a flooding dose. The model consists of three protein pools turning over at fast (102umoles leu, t1/2 = 11.5hr), medium (212umoles leu, t1/2 = 16.6hr) or slow (536umoles leu, t1/2 = 71.5hr) rates and three free amino acids pools; leucyl-tRNA (0.0249umoles leu), intracellular leucine (5.72umoles leu) and extracellular leucine (1.69umoles leu). The model was adjusted to represent protein turnover in specific tissues: liver, muscle and intestine. Specific radioactivities from whole body and tissue experiments were fit to the whole body and tissue models, respectively, to estimate the rates of recycling and channeling. Data from 14C leucine flooding dose experiments in whole mice showed amino acids for protein synthesis were from extracellular sources. However, data from tissues indicated that in fast turnover tissues, amino acids for protein synthesis were primarily from recycling. Therefore current methods of estimating FSR include error associated with incorrectly estimating the precursor pool specific radioactivity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749304774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749304774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33749304774

VL - 12

JO - FASEB Journal

JF - FASEB Journal

SN - 0892-6638

IS - 5

ER -