A comparison of the clinical utility of several published formulae for estimated osmolality of canine serum

Daniel T. Dugger, Steven E Epstein, Katrina Hopper, Matthew S. Mellema

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the normal osmole gap for 18 previously published formulae used to estimate serum osmolality in dogs.

DESIGN: Prospective study.

SETTING: University veterinary medical teaching hospital.

ANIMALS: Two hundred and fifty client-owned dogs.None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Serum samples were saved and frozen at -80°C after routine biochemical analysis as ordered by attending clinicians. An Advanced Micro Osmometer 3300 was used to measure serum osmolality. Eighteen distinct formulae previously reported in the medical literature were used to calculate the osmolality from the biochemical analysis results. The calculated osmolality was then subtracted from the measured osmolality to determine the osmole gap. Osmole gaps for azotemic and hyperglycemic dogs were compared to those of dogs without azotemia or hyperglycemia using each formula. The median measured osmolality for all dogs in the study was 302 mOsm/kg (interquartile range 297-307). The osmole gaps varied widely depending on the formula used to calculate osmolality and the presence or absence of hyperglycemia or azotemia. Eleven formulae led to calculated osmolality and osmole gaps that were not statistically different when hyperglycemia or azotemia was present. Four out of these 11 formulae resulted in osmole gaps near zero.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Multiple formulae reported to calculate serum osmolality can be used in the clinical setting, but they result in significantly different normal osmole gaps. Clinicians should be aware of the specific reference interval for the formula being used. The authors recommend the formula 2(Na(+) ) + [glucose/18] + [BUN/2.8] because it is easy to use and is reliable even when hyperglycemia or azotemia are present.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)188-193
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

osmolality
Osmolar Concentration
Canidae
Azotemia
dogs
uremia
Serum
hyperglycemia
Hyperglycemia
Dogs
Blood Urea Nitrogen
prospective studies
Teaching Hospitals
Prospective Studies
Glucose
glucose

Keywords

  • azotemia
  • ethylene glycol
  • hyperglycemia
  • osmolarity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{91732dff937943b1922cc5cccc22e648,
title = "A comparison of the clinical utility of several published formulae for estimated osmolality of canine serum",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To determine the normal osmole gap for 18 previously published formulae used to estimate serum osmolality in dogs.DESIGN: Prospective study.SETTING: University veterinary medical teaching hospital.ANIMALS: Two hundred and fifty client-owned dogs.None.MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Serum samples were saved and frozen at -80°C after routine biochemical analysis as ordered by attending clinicians. An Advanced Micro Osmometer 3300 was used to measure serum osmolality. Eighteen distinct formulae previously reported in the medical literature were used to calculate the osmolality from the biochemical analysis results. The calculated osmolality was then subtracted from the measured osmolality to determine the osmole gap. Osmole gaps for azotemic and hyperglycemic dogs were compared to those of dogs without azotemia or hyperglycemia using each formula. The median measured osmolality for all dogs in the study was 302 mOsm/kg (interquartile range 297-307). The osmole gaps varied widely depending on the formula used to calculate osmolality and the presence or absence of hyperglycemia or azotemia. Eleven formulae led to calculated osmolality and osmole gaps that were not statistically different when hyperglycemia or azotemia was present. Four out of these 11 formulae resulted in osmole gaps near zero.CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Multiple formulae reported to calculate serum osmolality can be used in the clinical setting, but they result in significantly different normal osmole gaps. Clinicians should be aware of the specific reference interval for the formula being used. The authors recommend the formula 2(Na(+) ) + [glucose/18] + [BUN/2.8] because it is easy to use and is reliable even when hyperglycemia or azotemia are present.",
keywords = "azotemia, ethylene glycol, hyperglycemia, osmolarity",
author = "Dugger, {Daniel T.} and Epstein, {Steven E} and Katrina Hopper and Mellema, {Matthew S.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1111/vec.12153",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "188--193",
journal = "Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care",
issn = "1479-3261",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of the clinical utility of several published formulae for estimated osmolality of canine serum

AU - Dugger, Daniel T.

AU - Epstein, Steven E

AU - Hopper, Katrina

AU - Mellema, Matthew S.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To determine the normal osmole gap for 18 previously published formulae used to estimate serum osmolality in dogs.DESIGN: Prospective study.SETTING: University veterinary medical teaching hospital.ANIMALS: Two hundred and fifty client-owned dogs.None.MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Serum samples were saved and frozen at -80°C after routine biochemical analysis as ordered by attending clinicians. An Advanced Micro Osmometer 3300 was used to measure serum osmolality. Eighteen distinct formulae previously reported in the medical literature were used to calculate the osmolality from the biochemical analysis results. The calculated osmolality was then subtracted from the measured osmolality to determine the osmole gap. Osmole gaps for azotemic and hyperglycemic dogs were compared to those of dogs without azotemia or hyperglycemia using each formula. The median measured osmolality for all dogs in the study was 302 mOsm/kg (interquartile range 297-307). The osmole gaps varied widely depending on the formula used to calculate osmolality and the presence or absence of hyperglycemia or azotemia. Eleven formulae led to calculated osmolality and osmole gaps that were not statistically different when hyperglycemia or azotemia was present. Four out of these 11 formulae resulted in osmole gaps near zero.CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Multiple formulae reported to calculate serum osmolality can be used in the clinical setting, but they result in significantly different normal osmole gaps. Clinicians should be aware of the specific reference interval for the formula being used. The authors recommend the formula 2(Na(+) ) + [glucose/18] + [BUN/2.8] because it is easy to use and is reliable even when hyperglycemia or azotemia are present.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To determine the normal osmole gap for 18 previously published formulae used to estimate serum osmolality in dogs.DESIGN: Prospective study.SETTING: University veterinary medical teaching hospital.ANIMALS: Two hundred and fifty client-owned dogs.None.MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Serum samples were saved and frozen at -80°C after routine biochemical analysis as ordered by attending clinicians. An Advanced Micro Osmometer 3300 was used to measure serum osmolality. Eighteen distinct formulae previously reported in the medical literature were used to calculate the osmolality from the biochemical analysis results. The calculated osmolality was then subtracted from the measured osmolality to determine the osmole gap. Osmole gaps for azotemic and hyperglycemic dogs were compared to those of dogs without azotemia or hyperglycemia using each formula. The median measured osmolality for all dogs in the study was 302 mOsm/kg (interquartile range 297-307). The osmole gaps varied widely depending on the formula used to calculate osmolality and the presence or absence of hyperglycemia or azotemia. Eleven formulae led to calculated osmolality and osmole gaps that were not statistically different when hyperglycemia or azotemia was present. Four out of these 11 formulae resulted in osmole gaps near zero.CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Multiple formulae reported to calculate serum osmolality can be used in the clinical setting, but they result in significantly different normal osmole gaps. Clinicians should be aware of the specific reference interval for the formula being used. The authors recommend the formula 2(Na(+) ) + [glucose/18] + [BUN/2.8] because it is easy to use and is reliable even when hyperglycemia or azotemia are present.

KW - azotemia

KW - ethylene glycol

KW - hyperglycemia

KW - osmolarity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922068417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922068417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/vec.12153

DO - 10.1111/vec.12153

M3 - Article

C2 - 24739033

AN - SCOPUS:84922068417

VL - 24

SP - 188

EP - 193

JO - Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care

JF - Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care

SN - 1479-3261

IS - 2

ER -