A comparison of Hysterosalpingography and Laparoscopy in the investigation of infertility

Shagufta Yasmeen; Intikhab Alam; Malik Munfat; Afshan Qadir; Shahida Masarat Mufti

A comparison of Hysterosalpingography and Laparoscopy in the investigation of infertility

Shagufta Yasmeen, Intikhab Alam, Malik Munfat, Afshan Qadir, Shahida Masarat Mufti

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Abstract

100 patients of infertility in the age group of 18-37 years were taken up for Hysterosalpingography and Diagnostic Laparoscopy at Lalla Dad Hospital Srinagar during the year 2001-2003. 72% patients were of primary infertility and 28% patients were of secondary infertility. Hysterosalpingography was fruitful in detecting uterine and tubal pathology very well but was of no value for diagnosis of ovarian disease, whereas, Laparoscopy was good in detecting tubal and ovarian pathology in detail. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of the two. Total agreement between the results of the two procedures was seenin 87% cases. Complications encountered were minimal. Where the hospital stay ranged from 1-3 days for laparoscopy, Hysterosalpingography was done as an outdoor procedure.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	15-16
Number of pages	2
Journal	JK Practitioner
Volume	15
Issue number	1-4
State	Published - Jan 2008
Externally published	Yes

Fingerprint

Keywords

Hysterosalpingography
Infertility
Laparoscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Medicine(all)

Cite this

Yasmeen, S., Alam, I., Munfat, M., Qadir, A., & Mufti, S. M. (2008). A comparison of Hysterosalpingography and Laparoscopy in the investigation of infertility. JK Practitioner, 15(1-4), 15-16.

@article{2ccfd42a8b7a488a9120bebbde24cdd7,

title = "A comparison of Hysterosalpingography and Laparoscopy in the investigation of infertility",

abstract = "100 patients of infertility in the age group of 18-37 years were taken up for Hysterosalpingography and Diagnostic Laparoscopy at Lalla Dad Hospital Srinagar during the year 2001-2003. 72% patients were of primary infertility and 28% patients were of secondary infertility. Hysterosalpingography was fruitful in detecting uterine and tubal pathology very well but was of no value for diagnosis of ovarian disease, whereas, Laparoscopy was good in detecting tubal and ovarian pathology in detail. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of the two. Total agreement between the results of the two procedures was seenin 87% cases. Complications encountered were minimal. Where the hospital stay ranged from 1-3 days for laparoscopy, Hysterosalpingography was done as an outdoor procedure.",

keywords = "Hysterosalpingography, Infertility, Laparoscopy",

author = "Shagufta Yasmeen and Intikhab Alam and Malik Munfat and Afshan Qadir and Mufti, {Shahida Masarat}",

year = "2008",

month = jan

language = "English (US)",

volume = "15",

pages = "15--16",

journal = "JK Practitioner",

issn = "0971-8834",

publisher = "JK Practitioner",

number = "1-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of Hysterosalpingography and Laparoscopy in the investigation of infertility

AU - Yasmeen, Shagufta

AU - Alam, Intikhab

AU - Munfat, Malik

AU - Qadir, Afshan

AU - Mufti, Shahida Masarat

PY - 2008/1

Y1 - 2008/1

N2 - 100 patients of infertility in the age group of 18-37 years were taken up for Hysterosalpingography and Diagnostic Laparoscopy at Lalla Dad Hospital Srinagar during the year 2001-2003. 72% patients were of primary infertility and 28% patients were of secondary infertility. Hysterosalpingography was fruitful in detecting uterine and tubal pathology very well but was of no value for diagnosis of ovarian disease, whereas, Laparoscopy was good in detecting tubal and ovarian pathology in detail. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of the two. Total agreement between the results of the two procedures was seenin 87% cases. Complications encountered were minimal. Where the hospital stay ranged from 1-3 days for laparoscopy, Hysterosalpingography was done as an outdoor procedure.

AB - 100 patients of infertility in the age group of 18-37 years were taken up for Hysterosalpingography and Diagnostic Laparoscopy at Lalla Dad Hospital Srinagar during the year 2001-2003. 72% patients were of primary infertility and 28% patients were of secondary infertility. Hysterosalpingography was fruitful in detecting uterine and tubal pathology very well but was of no value for diagnosis of ovarian disease, whereas, Laparoscopy was good in detecting tubal and ovarian pathology in detail. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of the two. Total agreement between the results of the two procedures was seenin 87% cases. Complications encountered were minimal. Where the hospital stay ranged from 1-3 days for laparoscopy, Hysterosalpingography was done as an outdoor procedure.

KW - Hysterosalpingography

KW - Infertility

KW - Laparoscopy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64949147416&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=64949147416&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:64949147416

VL - 15

SP - 15

EP - 16

JO - JK Practitioner

JF - JK Practitioner

SN - 0971-8834

IS - 1-4

ER -

A comparison of Hysterosalpingography and Laparoscopy in the investigation of infertility

Abstract

Fingerprint

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Access to Document