Abstract
100 patients of infertility in the age group of 18-37 years were taken up for Hysterosalpingography and Diagnostic Laparoscopy at Lalla Dad Hospital Srinagar during the year 2001-2003. 72% patients were of primary infertility and 28% patients were of secondary infertility. Hysterosalpingography was fruitful in detecting uterine and tubal pathology very well but was of no value for diagnosis of ovarian disease, whereas, Laparoscopy was good in detecting tubal and ovarian pathology in detail. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of the two. Total agreement between the results of the two procedures was seenin 87% cases. Complications encountered were minimal. Where the hospital stay ranged from 1-3 days for laparoscopy, Hysterosalpingography was done as an outdoor procedure.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 15-16 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | JK Practitioner |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 1-4 |
| State | Published - Jan 2008 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Hysterosalpingography
- Infertility
- Laparoscopy
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Medicine(all)
Cite this
A comparison of Hysterosalpingography and Laparoscopy in the investigation of infertility. / Yasmeen, Shagufta; Alam, Intikhab; Munfat, Malik; Qadir, Afshan; Mufti, Shahida Masarat.
In: JK Practitioner, Vol. 15, No. 1-4, 01.2008, p. 15-16.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparison of Hysterosalpingography and Laparoscopy in the investigation of infertility
AU - Yasmeen, Shagufta
AU - Alam, Intikhab
AU - Munfat, Malik
AU - Qadir, Afshan
AU - Mufti, Shahida Masarat
PY - 2008/1
Y1 - 2008/1
N2 - 100 patients of infertility in the age group of 18-37 years were taken up for Hysterosalpingography and Diagnostic Laparoscopy at Lalla Dad Hospital Srinagar during the year 2001-2003. 72% patients were of primary infertility and 28% patients were of secondary infertility. Hysterosalpingography was fruitful in detecting uterine and tubal pathology very well but was of no value for diagnosis of ovarian disease, whereas, Laparoscopy was good in detecting tubal and ovarian pathology in detail. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of the two. Total agreement between the results of the two procedures was seenin 87% cases. Complications encountered were minimal. Where the hospital stay ranged from 1-3 days for laparoscopy, Hysterosalpingography was done as an outdoor procedure.
AB - 100 patients of infertility in the age group of 18-37 years were taken up for Hysterosalpingography and Diagnostic Laparoscopy at Lalla Dad Hospital Srinagar during the year 2001-2003. 72% patients were of primary infertility and 28% patients were of secondary infertility. Hysterosalpingography was fruitful in detecting uterine and tubal pathology very well but was of no value for diagnosis of ovarian disease, whereas, Laparoscopy was good in detecting tubal and ovarian pathology in detail. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of the two. Total agreement between the results of the two procedures was seenin 87% cases. Complications encountered were minimal. Where the hospital stay ranged from 1-3 days for laparoscopy, Hysterosalpingography was done as an outdoor procedure.
KW - Hysterosalpingography
KW - Infertility
KW - Laparoscopy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64949147416&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=64949147416&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:64949147416
VL - 15
SP - 15
EP - 16
JO - JK Practitioner
JF - JK Practitioner
SN - 0971-8834
IS - 1-4
ER -