A comparison of existing global DNA methylation assays to low-coverage whole-genome bisulfite sequencing for epidemiological studies

Florence K. Crary-Dooley, Mitchell E. Tam, Keith W. Dunaway, Irva Hertz-Picciotto, Rebecca Jean Schmidt, Janine M LaSalle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

DNA methylation is an epigenetic mark at the interface of genetic and environmental factors relevant to human disease. Quantitative assessments of global DNA methylation levels have therefore become important tools in epidemiology research, particularly for understanding effects of environmental exposures in complex diseases. Among the available methods of quantitative DNA methylation measurements, bisulfite sequencing is considered the gold standard, but whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) has previously been considered too costly for epidemiology studies with high sample numbers. Pyrosequencing of repetitive sequences within bisulfite-treated DNA has been routinely used as a surrogate for global DNA methylation, but a comparison of pyrosequencing to WGBS for accuracy and reproducibility of methylation levels has not been performed. This study compared the global methylation levels measured from uniquely mappable (non-repetitive) WGBS sequences to pyrosequencing assays of several repeat sequences and repeat assay-matched WGBS data and determined uniquely mappable WGBS data to be the most reproducible and accurate measurement of global DNA methylation levels. We determined sources of variation in repetitive pyrosequencing assays to be PCR amplification bias, PCR primer selection bias in methylation levels of targeted sequences, and inherent variability in methylation levels of repeat sequences. Low-coverage, uniquely mappable WGBS showed the strongest correlation between replicates of all assays. By using multiplexing by indexed bar codes, the cost of WGBS can be lowered significantly to improve the accuracy of global DNA methylation assessments for human studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)206-214
Number of pages9
JournalEpigenetics
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 4 2017

Fingerprint

DNA Methylation
Epidemiologic Studies
Genome
Methylation
Epidemiology
hydrogen sulfite
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Selection Bias
Nucleic Acid Repetitive Sequences
Environmental Exposure
Automatic Data Processing
Epigenomics
Costs and Cost Analysis
DNA
Research

Keywords

  • Environmental epigenetics
  • global DNA methylation
  • pyrosequencing
  • whole-genome bisulfite sequencing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Biology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

A comparison of existing global DNA methylation assays to low-coverage whole-genome bisulfite sequencing for epidemiological studies. / Crary-Dooley, Florence K.; Tam, Mitchell E.; Dunaway, Keith W.; Hertz-Picciotto, Irva; Schmidt, Rebecca Jean; LaSalle, Janine M.

In: Epigenetics, Vol. 12, No. 3, 04.03.2017, p. 206-214.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1cc38cf28a074e47906b1163036acc19,
title = "A comparison of existing global DNA methylation assays to low-coverage whole-genome bisulfite sequencing for epidemiological studies",
abstract = "DNA methylation is an epigenetic mark at the interface of genetic and environmental factors relevant to human disease. Quantitative assessments of global DNA methylation levels have therefore become important tools in epidemiology research, particularly for understanding effects of environmental exposures in complex diseases. Among the available methods of quantitative DNA methylation measurements, bisulfite sequencing is considered the gold standard, but whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) has previously been considered too costly for epidemiology studies with high sample numbers. Pyrosequencing of repetitive sequences within bisulfite-treated DNA has been routinely used as a surrogate for global DNA methylation, but a comparison of pyrosequencing to WGBS for accuracy and reproducibility of methylation levels has not been performed. This study compared the global methylation levels measured from uniquely mappable (non-repetitive) WGBS sequences to pyrosequencing assays of several repeat sequences and repeat assay-matched WGBS data and determined uniquely mappable WGBS data to be the most reproducible and accurate measurement of global DNA methylation levels. We determined sources of variation in repetitive pyrosequencing assays to be PCR amplification bias, PCR primer selection bias in methylation levels of targeted sequences, and inherent variability in methylation levels of repeat sequences. Low-coverage, uniquely mappable WGBS showed the strongest correlation between replicates of all assays. By using multiplexing by indexed bar codes, the cost of WGBS can be lowered significantly to improve the accuracy of global DNA methylation assessments for human studies.",
keywords = "Environmental epigenetics, global DNA methylation, pyrosequencing, whole-genome bisulfite sequencing",
author = "Crary-Dooley, {Florence K.} and Tam, {Mitchell E.} and Dunaway, {Keith W.} and Irva Hertz-Picciotto and Schmidt, {Rebecca Jean} and LaSalle, {Janine M}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/15592294.2016.1276680",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "206--214",
journal = "Epigenetics",
issn = "1559-2294",
publisher = "Landes Bioscience",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of existing global DNA methylation assays to low-coverage whole-genome bisulfite sequencing for epidemiological studies

AU - Crary-Dooley, Florence K.

AU - Tam, Mitchell E.

AU - Dunaway, Keith W.

AU - Hertz-Picciotto, Irva

AU - Schmidt, Rebecca Jean

AU - LaSalle, Janine M

PY - 2017/3/4

Y1 - 2017/3/4

N2 - DNA methylation is an epigenetic mark at the interface of genetic and environmental factors relevant to human disease. Quantitative assessments of global DNA methylation levels have therefore become important tools in epidemiology research, particularly for understanding effects of environmental exposures in complex diseases. Among the available methods of quantitative DNA methylation measurements, bisulfite sequencing is considered the gold standard, but whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) has previously been considered too costly for epidemiology studies with high sample numbers. Pyrosequencing of repetitive sequences within bisulfite-treated DNA has been routinely used as a surrogate for global DNA methylation, but a comparison of pyrosequencing to WGBS for accuracy and reproducibility of methylation levels has not been performed. This study compared the global methylation levels measured from uniquely mappable (non-repetitive) WGBS sequences to pyrosequencing assays of several repeat sequences and repeat assay-matched WGBS data and determined uniquely mappable WGBS data to be the most reproducible and accurate measurement of global DNA methylation levels. We determined sources of variation in repetitive pyrosequencing assays to be PCR amplification bias, PCR primer selection bias in methylation levels of targeted sequences, and inherent variability in methylation levels of repeat sequences. Low-coverage, uniquely mappable WGBS showed the strongest correlation between replicates of all assays. By using multiplexing by indexed bar codes, the cost of WGBS can be lowered significantly to improve the accuracy of global DNA methylation assessments for human studies.

AB - DNA methylation is an epigenetic mark at the interface of genetic and environmental factors relevant to human disease. Quantitative assessments of global DNA methylation levels have therefore become important tools in epidemiology research, particularly for understanding effects of environmental exposures in complex diseases. Among the available methods of quantitative DNA methylation measurements, bisulfite sequencing is considered the gold standard, but whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) has previously been considered too costly for epidemiology studies with high sample numbers. Pyrosequencing of repetitive sequences within bisulfite-treated DNA has been routinely used as a surrogate for global DNA methylation, but a comparison of pyrosequencing to WGBS for accuracy and reproducibility of methylation levels has not been performed. This study compared the global methylation levels measured from uniquely mappable (non-repetitive) WGBS sequences to pyrosequencing assays of several repeat sequences and repeat assay-matched WGBS data and determined uniquely mappable WGBS data to be the most reproducible and accurate measurement of global DNA methylation levels. We determined sources of variation in repetitive pyrosequencing assays to be PCR amplification bias, PCR primer selection bias in methylation levels of targeted sequences, and inherent variability in methylation levels of repeat sequences. Low-coverage, uniquely mappable WGBS showed the strongest correlation between replicates of all assays. By using multiplexing by indexed bar codes, the cost of WGBS can be lowered significantly to improve the accuracy of global DNA methylation assessments for human studies.

KW - Environmental epigenetics

KW - global DNA methylation

KW - pyrosequencing

KW - whole-genome bisulfite sequencing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013104230&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013104230&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15592294.2016.1276680

DO - 10.1080/15592294.2016.1276680

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 206

EP - 214

JO - Epigenetics

JF - Epigenetics

SN - 1559-2294

IS - 3

ER -