A 2D ion chamber array audit of wedged and asymmetric fields in an inhomogeneous lung phantom

Jessica Lye, John Kenny, Joerg Lehmann, Leon Dunn, Tomas Kron, Andrew Alves, Andrew Cole, Ivan Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service (ACDS) has implemented a new method of a nonreference condition Level II type dosimetric audit of radiotherapy services to increase measurement accuracy and patient safety within Australia. The aim of this work is to describe the methodology, tolerances, and outcomes from the new audit.

Methods: The ACDS Level II audit measures the dose delivered in 2D planes using an ionization chamber based array positioned at multiple depths. Measurements are made in rectilinear homogeneous and inhomogeneous phantoms composed of slabs of solid water and lung. Computer generated computed tomography data sets of the rectilinear phantoms are supplied to the facility prior to audit for planning of a range of cases including reference fields, asymmetric fields, and wedged fields. The audit assesses 3D planning with 6 MV photons with a static (zero degree) gantry. Scoring is performed using local dose differences between the planned and measured dose within 80% of the field width. The overall audit result is determined by the maximum dose difference over all scoring points, cases, and planes. Pass (Optimal Level) is defined as maximum dose difference .3.3%, Pass (Action Level) is ≤5.0%, and Fail (Out of Tolerance) is 5.0%.

Results: At close of 2013, the ACDS had performed 24 Level II audits. 63% of the audits passed, 33% failed, and the remaining audit was not assessable. Of the 15 audits that passed, 3 were at Pass (Action Level). The high fail rate is largely due to a systemic issue with modeling asymmetric 60. wedges which caused a delivered overdose of 5%.8%.

Conclusions: The ACDS has implemented a nonreference condition Level II type audit, based on ion chamber 2D array measurements in an inhomogeneous slab phantom. The powerful diagnostic ability of this audit has allowed the ACDS to rigorously test the treatment planning systems implemented in Australian radiotherapy facilities. Recommendations from audits have led to facilities modifying clinical practice and changing planning protocols. C 2014 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number101712
JournalMedical Physics
Volume41
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Radiotherapy
Ions
Lung
Patient Safety
Photons
Tomography
Medicine
Water
Therapeutics
Datasets

Keywords

  • audit
  • dosimetery
  • quality
  • radiotherapy
  • safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Lye, J., Kenny, J., Lehmann, J., Dunn, L., Kron, T., Alves, A., ... Williams, I. (2014). A 2D ion chamber array audit of wedged and asymmetric fields in an inhomogeneous lung phantom. Medical Physics, 41(10), [101712]. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4896097

A 2D ion chamber array audit of wedged and asymmetric fields in an inhomogeneous lung phantom. / Lye, Jessica; Kenny, John; Lehmann, Joerg; Dunn, Leon; Kron, Tomas; Alves, Andrew; Cole, Andrew; Williams, Ivan.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 41, No. 10, 101712, 01.10.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lye, J, Kenny, J, Lehmann, J, Dunn, L, Kron, T, Alves, A, Cole, A & Williams, I 2014, 'A 2D ion chamber array audit of wedged and asymmetric fields in an inhomogeneous lung phantom', Medical Physics, vol. 41, no. 10, 101712. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4896097
Lye, Jessica ; Kenny, John ; Lehmann, Joerg ; Dunn, Leon ; Kron, Tomas ; Alves, Andrew ; Cole, Andrew ; Williams, Ivan. / A 2D ion chamber array audit of wedged and asymmetric fields in an inhomogeneous lung phantom. In: Medical Physics. 2014 ; Vol. 41, No. 10.
@article{284f290f58a34a00a2a0b42fb99a29a3,
title = "A 2D ion chamber array audit of wedged and asymmetric fields in an inhomogeneous lung phantom",
abstract = "Purpose: The Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service (ACDS) has implemented a new method of a nonreference condition Level II type dosimetric audit of radiotherapy services to increase measurement accuracy and patient safety within Australia. The aim of this work is to describe the methodology, tolerances, and outcomes from the new audit.Methods: The ACDS Level II audit measures the dose delivered in 2D planes using an ionization chamber based array positioned at multiple depths. Measurements are made in rectilinear homogeneous and inhomogeneous phantoms composed of slabs of solid water and lung. Computer generated computed tomography data sets of the rectilinear phantoms are supplied to the facility prior to audit for planning of a range of cases including reference fields, asymmetric fields, and wedged fields. The audit assesses 3D planning with 6 MV photons with a static (zero degree) gantry. Scoring is performed using local dose differences between the planned and measured dose within 80{\%} of the field width. The overall audit result is determined by the maximum dose difference over all scoring points, cases, and planes. Pass (Optimal Level) is defined as maximum dose difference .3.3{\%}, Pass (Action Level) is ≤5.0{\%}, and Fail (Out of Tolerance) is 5.0{\%}.Results: At close of 2013, the ACDS had performed 24 Level II audits. 63{\%} of the audits passed, 33{\%} failed, and the remaining audit was not assessable. Of the 15 audits that passed, 3 were at Pass (Action Level). The high fail rate is largely due to a systemic issue with modeling asymmetric 60. wedges which caused a delivered overdose of 5{\%}.8{\%}.Conclusions: The ACDS has implemented a nonreference condition Level II type audit, based on ion chamber 2D array measurements in an inhomogeneous slab phantom. The powerful diagnostic ability of this audit has allowed the ACDS to rigorously test the treatment planning systems implemented in Australian radiotherapy facilities. Recommendations from audits have led to facilities modifying clinical practice and changing planning protocols. C 2014 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.",
keywords = "audit, dosimetery, quality, radiotherapy, safety",
author = "Jessica Lye and John Kenny and Joerg Lehmann and Leon Dunn and Tomas Kron and Andrew Alves and Andrew Cole and Ivan Williams",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1118/1.4896097",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A 2D ion chamber array audit of wedged and asymmetric fields in an inhomogeneous lung phantom

AU - Lye, Jessica

AU - Kenny, John

AU - Lehmann, Joerg

AU - Dunn, Leon

AU - Kron, Tomas

AU - Alves, Andrew

AU - Cole, Andrew

AU - Williams, Ivan

PY - 2014/10/1

Y1 - 2014/10/1

N2 - Purpose: The Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service (ACDS) has implemented a new method of a nonreference condition Level II type dosimetric audit of radiotherapy services to increase measurement accuracy and patient safety within Australia. The aim of this work is to describe the methodology, tolerances, and outcomes from the new audit.Methods: The ACDS Level II audit measures the dose delivered in 2D planes using an ionization chamber based array positioned at multiple depths. Measurements are made in rectilinear homogeneous and inhomogeneous phantoms composed of slabs of solid water and lung. Computer generated computed tomography data sets of the rectilinear phantoms are supplied to the facility prior to audit for planning of a range of cases including reference fields, asymmetric fields, and wedged fields. The audit assesses 3D planning with 6 MV photons with a static (zero degree) gantry. Scoring is performed using local dose differences between the planned and measured dose within 80% of the field width. The overall audit result is determined by the maximum dose difference over all scoring points, cases, and planes. Pass (Optimal Level) is defined as maximum dose difference .3.3%, Pass (Action Level) is ≤5.0%, and Fail (Out of Tolerance) is 5.0%.Results: At close of 2013, the ACDS had performed 24 Level II audits. 63% of the audits passed, 33% failed, and the remaining audit was not assessable. Of the 15 audits that passed, 3 were at Pass (Action Level). The high fail rate is largely due to a systemic issue with modeling asymmetric 60. wedges which caused a delivered overdose of 5%.8%.Conclusions: The ACDS has implemented a nonreference condition Level II type audit, based on ion chamber 2D array measurements in an inhomogeneous slab phantom. The powerful diagnostic ability of this audit has allowed the ACDS to rigorously test the treatment planning systems implemented in Australian radiotherapy facilities. Recommendations from audits have led to facilities modifying clinical practice and changing planning protocols. C 2014 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

AB - Purpose: The Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service (ACDS) has implemented a new method of a nonreference condition Level II type dosimetric audit of radiotherapy services to increase measurement accuracy and patient safety within Australia. The aim of this work is to describe the methodology, tolerances, and outcomes from the new audit.Methods: The ACDS Level II audit measures the dose delivered in 2D planes using an ionization chamber based array positioned at multiple depths. Measurements are made in rectilinear homogeneous and inhomogeneous phantoms composed of slabs of solid water and lung. Computer generated computed tomography data sets of the rectilinear phantoms are supplied to the facility prior to audit for planning of a range of cases including reference fields, asymmetric fields, and wedged fields. The audit assesses 3D planning with 6 MV photons with a static (zero degree) gantry. Scoring is performed using local dose differences between the planned and measured dose within 80% of the field width. The overall audit result is determined by the maximum dose difference over all scoring points, cases, and planes. Pass (Optimal Level) is defined as maximum dose difference .3.3%, Pass (Action Level) is ≤5.0%, and Fail (Out of Tolerance) is 5.0%.Results: At close of 2013, the ACDS had performed 24 Level II audits. 63% of the audits passed, 33% failed, and the remaining audit was not assessable. Of the 15 audits that passed, 3 were at Pass (Action Level). The high fail rate is largely due to a systemic issue with modeling asymmetric 60. wedges which caused a delivered overdose of 5%.8%.Conclusions: The ACDS has implemented a nonreference condition Level II type audit, based on ion chamber 2D array measurements in an inhomogeneous slab phantom. The powerful diagnostic ability of this audit has allowed the ACDS to rigorously test the treatment planning systems implemented in Australian radiotherapy facilities. Recommendations from audits have led to facilities modifying clinical practice and changing planning protocols. C 2014 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

KW - audit

KW - dosimetery

KW - quality

KW - radiotherapy

KW - safety

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907757701&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907757701&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.4896097

DO - 10.1118/1.4896097

M3 - Article

VL - 41

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 10

M1 - 101712

ER -