3D Printing: current use in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery

Tsung yen Hsieh, Raj Dedhia, Brian Cervenka, Travis Tate Tollefson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the use of three-dimensional (3D) printing in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery, with a focus on current uses in surgical training, surgical planning, clinical outcomes, and biomedical research. To evaluate the limitations and future implications of 3D printing in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies reviewed demonstrated 3D printing applications in surgical planning including accurate anatomic biomodels, surgical cutting guides in reconstruction, and patient-specific implants fabrication. 3D printing technology also offers access to well tolerated, reproducible, and high-fidelity/patient-specific models for surgical training. Emerging research in 3D biomaterial printing have led to the development of biocompatible scaffolds with potential for tissue regeneration in reconstruction cases involving significant tissue absence or loss. Major limitations of utilizing 3D printing technology include time and cost, which may be offset by decreased operating times and collaboration between departments to diffuse in-house printing costs SUMMARY: The current state of the literature shows promising results, but has not yet been validated by large studies or randomized controlled trials. Ultimately, further research and advancements in 3D printing technology should be supported as there is potential to improve resident training, patient care, and surgical outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalCurrent Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jul 20 2017

Fingerprint

Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
Plastic Surgery
Technology
Anatomic Models
Costs and Cost Analysis
Printing
Three Dimensional Printing
Biocompatible Materials
Research
Biomedical Research
Regeneration
Patient Care
Randomized Controlled Trials
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

3D Printing : current use in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery. / Hsieh, Tsung yen; Dedhia, Raj; Cervenka, Brian; Tollefson, Travis Tate.

In: Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 20.07.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b1d1b399683144a49c0414bf322b3a80,
title = "3D Printing: current use in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery",
abstract = "PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the use of three-dimensional (3D) printing in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery, with a focus on current uses in surgical training, surgical planning, clinical outcomes, and biomedical research. To evaluate the limitations and future implications of 3D printing in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies reviewed demonstrated 3D printing applications in surgical planning including accurate anatomic biomodels, surgical cutting guides in reconstruction, and patient-specific implants fabrication. 3D printing technology also offers access to well tolerated, reproducible, and high-fidelity/patient-specific models for surgical training. Emerging research in 3D biomaterial printing have led to the development of biocompatible scaffolds with potential for tissue regeneration in reconstruction cases involving significant tissue absence or loss. Major limitations of utilizing 3D printing technology include time and cost, which may be offset by decreased operating times and collaboration between departments to diffuse in-house printing costs SUMMARY: The current state of the literature shows promising results, but has not yet been validated by large studies or randomized controlled trials. Ultimately, further research and advancements in 3D printing technology should be supported as there is potential to improve resident training, patient care, and surgical outcomes.",
author = "Hsieh, {Tsung yen} and Raj Dedhia and Brian Cervenka and Tollefson, {Travis Tate}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1097/MOO.0000000000000373",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery",
issn = "1068-9508",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 3D Printing

T2 - current use in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery

AU - Hsieh, Tsung yen

AU - Dedhia, Raj

AU - Cervenka, Brian

AU - Tollefson, Travis Tate

PY - 2017/7/20

Y1 - 2017/7/20

N2 - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the use of three-dimensional (3D) printing in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery, with a focus on current uses in surgical training, surgical planning, clinical outcomes, and biomedical research. To evaluate the limitations and future implications of 3D printing in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies reviewed demonstrated 3D printing applications in surgical planning including accurate anatomic biomodels, surgical cutting guides in reconstruction, and patient-specific implants fabrication. 3D printing technology also offers access to well tolerated, reproducible, and high-fidelity/patient-specific models for surgical training. Emerging research in 3D biomaterial printing have led to the development of biocompatible scaffolds with potential for tissue regeneration in reconstruction cases involving significant tissue absence or loss. Major limitations of utilizing 3D printing technology include time and cost, which may be offset by decreased operating times and collaboration between departments to diffuse in-house printing costs SUMMARY: The current state of the literature shows promising results, but has not yet been validated by large studies or randomized controlled trials. Ultimately, further research and advancements in 3D printing technology should be supported as there is potential to improve resident training, patient care, and surgical outcomes.

AB - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the use of three-dimensional (3D) printing in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery, with a focus on current uses in surgical training, surgical planning, clinical outcomes, and biomedical research. To evaluate the limitations and future implications of 3D printing in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies reviewed demonstrated 3D printing applications in surgical planning including accurate anatomic biomodels, surgical cutting guides in reconstruction, and patient-specific implants fabrication. 3D printing technology also offers access to well tolerated, reproducible, and high-fidelity/patient-specific models for surgical training. Emerging research in 3D biomaterial printing have led to the development of biocompatible scaffolds with potential for tissue regeneration in reconstruction cases involving significant tissue absence or loss. Major limitations of utilizing 3D printing technology include time and cost, which may be offset by decreased operating times and collaboration between departments to diffuse in-house printing costs SUMMARY: The current state of the literature shows promising results, but has not yet been validated by large studies or randomized controlled trials. Ultimately, further research and advancements in 3D printing technology should be supported as there is potential to improve resident training, patient care, and surgical outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021165803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021165803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000373

DO - 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000373

M3 - Article

C2 - 28639959

AN - SCOPUS:85021165803

JO - Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery

JF - Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery

SN - 1068-9508

ER -